Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020, 79-90 
79 
POSITIONING OF REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY IN THE 
MODERN SYSTEM OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES 
 
 
Ranko Mirić 
PhD, associate professor 
Department of Geography, Faculty of Science 
Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 
e-mail: rmiric@gmail.com 
 
Boris Avdić 
PhD, senior assistant  
Department of Geography, Faculty of Science 
Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 
e-mail: borisavdicpmf@hotmail.com 
 
Aida Bidžan-Gekić 
PhD, assistant professor 
Department of Geography, Faculty of Science 
Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 
e-mail: aidabidzan@gmail.com 
 
Haris Gekić 
PhD, assistant professor 
Department of Geography, Faculty of Science 
Zmaja od Bosne 33-35, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 
e-mail: haris.gekic@gmail.com 
 
UDK: 913:910.1 
COBISS: 1.02 
 
Abstract  
Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical sciences 
The main objective of this study is to provide a critical insight into the position of regional 
geography in modern geosciences, i.e. to examine the epistemological, methodological, practical 
and educational function of this synthetically oriented geographical discipline on a theoretical 
level. For this purpose, we have reviewed a number of readings selected from various published 
scientific papers and textbooks, which provide some sort of review of the modern concept of 
regional geography and the notion of region. The 1980s can be taken as the initial period of 
revitalization and redefinition of regional geography, when in addition to the traditional approach 
based on chorology, there was also the so-called new regional geography. The dominant 
concepts found in both these schools were evaluated by using the method of dialectical analysis 
and synthesis, on the basis of which the guidelines were proposed for future positioning of the 
spatial determination of the region within the geographical sciences. The general conclusion is 
that regional geography should not be viewed exclusively through the prism of idiographic 
concept, but the necessity would also be to aspire to discover the general spatial correlation 
patterns and regularities through various regional studies. 
Key words  
Regional geography, region, modern geography, geographical education, geographical 
dichotomy. 
 
 
 
Uredništvo je članek prejelo 9.12.2020  

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
80 
1. Introduction  
 
With its synthetic character, regional geography was once thought to be the main 
cohesion factor or connective tissue in geography as a science or a system of sciences, 
as well as epistemological-methodological approach that prevents its disintegration 
into several independent disciplines. In the meantime, the role and importance of 
regional geography have been re-examined multidimensionally, which has caused the 
emergence of plurality of perceptions within regional geography itself, but also a 
certain degree of degradation, which varies in time and space. However, many 
geographers still give regional geography a central, or at least a role that is equal to 
the role of general or systemic geography in the modern development of spatial 
scientific thought. Along with its methods, regional geography has a very important 
function and task in the study of spatial reality in its integral and complex 
manifestation (Nurković Mirić 2005; Mirić et al. 2017). There are several definitions 
of regional geography, but most of them are inextricably bound with the concept of 
region. So, for example, the Oxford Dictionary of Geography defines it as a 
geographical study of regions and their features (Mayhew 2009).  
 
Therefore, a precondition for an analysis of the terminological and conceptual 
definition of regional geography and its scientific scope is to define the term region as 
a mere spatial phenomenon. Etymologically, this term originates from the Latin word 
regio which means area, and in the Roman period it stood for an administrative 
territorial unit within the empire. Today, the term region most often referes to a unit-
area of the Earth’s surface that has natural or social characteristics that differentiate 
it from its surrounding areas (Mayhew 2009). However, in geography there is often a 
sharp confrontation between two opposing views of the region. According to the first 
view, the region is only a mental concept, i.e. construct or model that facilitates the 
understanding of geographical reality, while according to the second view it is an 
actual or existing spatial phenomenon that serves as a subject of study for regional 
geography (Nir, 1990). In some more practical terms, regions are usually classified 
into two groups: formal and functional. The former are based on homogeneity and 
the latter on connectivity. Regions can be distinguished on the basis of one or more 
geographical elements. Thus, some authors acknowledge: geomorphological, climatic, 
ecological, demographic, linguistic, mental, political, economic, resource, urban and 
other regions (Getis et al. 2000).  
 
Seen from a non-geographical perspective, the region is first identified as a primarily 
geographical term, although the regions are dealt with in different ways by various 
experts from other fields. So, for example according to Sadiković (2014), an author 
in the field of political science, this term clearly means a certain geographical area or 
an area designated by common natural, historical, cultural and other characteristics. 
Therefore, if the region is recognized in wider scientific and public circles as a 
geographically defined phenomenon, there is no justifiable reason for geographers to 
renounce the regional approach to scientific knowledge, which was otherwise a 
dominant trend in the third quarter of the past century. Despite the attempts to 
express considerable criticism, both substantiated and unsubstantiated, regional 
geography has kept its great educational significance in most countries across the 
world, as its synthetic approach is indispensable in explaining spatial phenomena and 
processes on Earth. 
 
One could claim that the dichotomies that exist within geography create numerous 
methodological problems for the modern development of this science as a whole, and 

Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020 
81 
constantly call into question the place that regional geography occupies in the system 
of sciences. In addition to the often pronounced dichotomies between physical and 
human, but also between general and regional geography, there is also a cognitive 
dichotomy associated with induction and deduction, then a conceptual one which is 
reflected in the idiographic and nomothetic approach, a methodological one between 
quantitative and qualitative research, a subject-matter dichotomy between place and 
space, etc. Some of them, such as e.g. the mutual opposition of idiographic and 
nomothetic approach, have some particularly adverse effects on regional geography. 
However, as Nir (1990) points out, all these dichotomies are in fact quintessentially 
apparent, and there is no need for their rigid interpretation, but they should instead 
be understood only as different ends of the same system. The fact that geography 
can be studied from a general and regional aspect, i.e. that it is possible to focus on 
general laws and patterns, but also individual examples, does not necessarily mean 
that one approach rules out another. In fact, their complementarity is something that 
imposes itself as an effective systemic solution for studying numerous problems of 
our time. The same applies to the other types of mentioned dichotomies.  
 
2. Regional geography at the end of the 20th century  
 
After the marginalization of regional geography that took place during the outbreak 
of the quantitative revolution in geography in the middle of the past century, the 
interest in regional studies was renewed during the 1980s. This was an expected 
consequence of the fact that the quantitative approach could not provide answers to 
some very topical questions at the time, primarily of a political, economic and 
environmental nature. The paradox of great popularity of regional publications in the 
general public, despite the marginalization within academical circles, also contributed 
to the revitalization of this geographical approach. Revitalization of regional 
geography was not a uniform process, but it was approached from two different angles 
– traditional and new. According to Pudup (1988), the aspiration of traditional regional 
geography is to return this discipline to the basics, i.e. to a chorological description. 
By contrast, the newly reconstructed regional geography places regional research as 
avant-garde in terms of its contribution to the social sciences. In any case, it has 
become evident that regional geography has not disappeared in spite of some 
expectations and forecasts. 
 
Yet another reason for re-actualizing the regional concept lies in the fact that many 
geographers were unable to fully accept the principles imposed by the quantitative 
revolution, since reality proved to be too complex to be brought under mere generic 
models. Geographers have thus rediscovered the ‘study of the specific’ (Gilbert 1988). 
Also, approaches that aspired to replace regional geography did not offer a new 
comprehensive paradigm. Re-emphasizing cause-and-effect relations within the 
structure of social sciences, and a more pronounced focus on social differences, are 
trends that were beneficial for regional geographers, but at the same time they also 
opened the way for pluralization within this discipline, as well as in geography in 
general. This means that the exclusivity maintained by traditional regional geography 
until the middle of the 20th century could not be achieved again. The attempts of 
some traditionalists who went in that direction were sharply criticized even among the 
regional geographers themselves, especially the main leaders and advocates of the 
school called ‘new regional geography’. 
 
According to the understanding of some modern regional geographers, the region has 
a primarily subjective character, and as such is suitable for individual and singular 

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
82 
approaches to its study. The standard definition of a region has become questionable, 
as have the universal principles for its recognition, delimitation, and description. 
Purposeful regional geography should be based on the dominant themes of each 
individual region. In such a loosely conceived concept of regional geography, only 
three items can be taken as common to all regional research: respect for the time 
dimension, the correlation between the degree of description and the regional level 
being researched, and the recognition of physical factors as an important element of 
geographical space (Hart 1982). However, this attitude implied that geography could 
not be viewed exclusively through the prism of science, which is why it encountered 
a number of counter-arguments from those who tried to place this discipline on a solid 
scientific foundation. Emphasis on the time dimension, i.e. regional changes that 
occur over time, particularly taking into account the genesis of the region, is a 
characteristic of many scientific studies that have dealt with the modern concept of 
regional geography. 
 
Despite the revitalization of regional geography, problems of an epistemological 
nature within this discipline have not yet been fully solved. So, for example, the issue 
of the region as a subject of study is often problematized. One of the most popular 
dilemmas within modern regional geography arose from that question: Does the 
region objectively exist in reality or is it a mere mental construct, i.e. the fruit of the 
thinking process? Yet another problem encountered by modern regional geography is 
the question of connectivity and interrelationships between different geographical 
levels. The fact that contemporary geographical reality is often a result of global rather 
than local or regional processes is not adequately addressed within the traditional 
concept in regional geography. Therefore, modern regional geographers suggest that 
meaningful cause-and-effect regional studies need to determine how these global and 
national processes are reflected in the local level (Sayer 1989). The issue of 
descriptiveness has also remained one of the most important problems of this 
discipline, although the authors in the field of regional geography constantly 
emphasize that description is only the starting method, and that it is necessary to 
search for general patterns and laws applicable to the distribution of spatial 
phenomena, underlying the regional structure. 
 
Revival and revisiting of some arguments by regional geography traditionalists has 
encouraged the return of chorology to geographical academic level. However, 
resistance to such an often static approach has remained quite strong, especially in 
the context of modern transformations in scientific research, where the boundaries 
between the study of space, time and society are becoming less and less constant. 
So, for example, Wishart (2004) compares a region (as an abstracted segment of 
space) with a period (as an abstracted segment of time). On the other hand, Passi 
(1991) suggests that the distinction between region and place, based on the principle 
of historicism and culture, which is both collective and individual, truly promotes an 
understanding of the historical evolution of regions and regional transformations, 
along with the role of human experience in that process. On this epistemological plain, 
the so-called new regional geography was created, which differs from the traditional 
regional concept primarily in its social orientation, but also in its attempt to rise to a 
higher level of scientific foundation. 
 
The development of the new regional geography was strongly influenced by a number 
of factors, which can be divided into internal and external. Internal factors arise from 
geography as a science itself. Through the quantitative revolution geography became 
burdened with statistical analyses that often did not provide adequate explanations. 

Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020 
83 
Critics of such an approach have pointed to a narrow field of interest, a neglect of the 
physical environment and a lack of synthetic analysis. It was the need for synthesis 
that proved to be the most important internal factor for the revived interest in regional 
geography. External factors have also had their stimulating effect. Some of the more 
important are the restructuring of capitalism as a system, economic development, the 
expansion of information systems and globalization in particular. Local, regional and 
national changes take place within these processes, which can have a political, cultural 
or economic character. In this context, there are two emerging mutually opposing 
interest groups – socio-economic and socio-cultural. The former diminish state 
sovereignty and identity, while the latter tend to strengthen them. This type of 
changes and processes is a real challenge for geographers, and it imposes regional 
research as an imperative. The impact of other stury fields and their theories should 
not be disregarded, which holds true for sociology in particular (Vresk 1997). 
 
The new regional geography, therefore, focuses on social structures and processes, 
often neglecting the natural basis. This approach was adopted for several reasons, 
most notably because of the realization that human society is less and less dependent 
on the natural basis, i.e. that the advantages or disadvantages it provides can be 
countermanded through social circumstances. Also, the connection and interaction 
between individuals and groups are increasingly pronounced in the modern age, as a 
result of which this dynamic process has attracted more attention from followers of 
the new regional geography compared to much more static processes that exist within 
the natural environment. Development processes are increasingly homogenizing the 
landscape and socially differentiating the population. This trend has changed the basic 
paradigm of regional geography with a shift from the man-nature to man-society-
space relationship. Instead of the previously dominant descriptive method, pluralism 
in the research approach came to the fore in the new regional geography, together 
with structuralism and humanism as the leading ideas (Vresk 1997). According to 
Wood (1999), the key features of the new approach to regional geography compared 
with the traditional school are associated with the theoretical dimension and can 
amount to three items: the explicit reference to theory, the reciprocal relationship 
between theory and empirical evidence and the resultant development of theory. 
 
Vresk (1997) highlights three groups of new characteristic approaches to 
regionalization and regional geography. The first is the political-economic approach, 
within which the region is treated as a local response to global capitalist processes. It 
is understood as a space where social processes related to the economic structure are 
organized, i.e. with the methods and volumes of production. To that effect, many 
authors highlight the fundamental role of circulation of capital in regional 
differentiation. Within this concept, the regional centre-periphery model is often put 
to use, while neo-Marxist theories come to the fore in a large number of scientific 
studies. The second group presents a range of humanistic-phenomenological 
approaches. In this context, the region is seen as an identification focus, while culture 
is given a central importance in regional differentiation. These approaches arise from 
humanistic geography, and appear mostly as a counterbalance to positivism. They 
are based on hermeneutic epistemology, on the basis of which numerous regional 
studies have been made. The third group includes structuralist-theoretical 
approaches, which conceive the region as a medium for social interactions, assuming 
that it has a fundamental role in their encouragement. Several theoretical works have 
been written in this field by authors such as Giddens (1984), Gilbert (1988) or Passi 
(1986; 1991), who have had a considerable impact in much wider scientific realm 
than the one of (regional) geography. 

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
84 
Further development of the new regional geography has led to the emergence of some 
completely new trends. Wood (1999) defines five of these trends, which he argues 
provide a solid foundation for future scientific research in this area. The first trend has 
a political-economic basis, and refers to the study of the process of spatial 
restructuring, i.e. regionalization processes. This, inter alia, implies the erosion of 
significance of the national geographical level, with the strengthening of the 
supranational and regional. The second trend treats regionalization as a ‘way of living’, 
since more and more individuals and groups have organized their lives on the regional 
level, as a result of increased mobility. For the socio-cultural aspect as one of the 
dominant trends in the new regional geography, it has already been pointed out that 
it has a fundamental importance in the modern understanding of the region and the 
development of regional geography. The following factors are closely associated with 
this trend - the production and reproduction of regional identities. However, it is of 
vital importance for this systematization to include also the fifth trend, which is 
associated with environmental debates, which are of growing importance on the 
regional level, particularly in terms of exploitation and circulation of economic 
resources. In this way, it was pointed out that the new regional geography cannot 
and must not completely push the natural environment out of its epistemology. 
 
In the meantime, there has been even greater pluralization in regional geography. 
Among other things, many authors saw a number of shortcomings in the neglect of 
the natural basis, so some of them began to take a midway between traditional and 
new regional geography. In this context, Nir (1989) advocated the concept of the 
region as a holon. Holon is a term that originates from ancient Greek philosophy, and 
in the modern regional sense it represents the idea of a single whole in which each of 
its constituent parts has a clear place defined in line with its structure. Also, each of 
these parts can in a sense be considered a separate whole. Holon therefore has an 
introverted character, because it is considered a coherent and complete entirety, but 
also at the same time it has an extroverted character, since it is viewed as part of a 
larger entirety. In this way, it is possible to designate a region – as a finite entity, but 
at the same time as part of something bigger. The same author emphasizes that the 
region should be viewed as a system. This approach is an attempt to overcome a 
number of dichotomies that exist in geography, but also to challenge the claims about 
regional geography as an exclusive ‘study of the specific’. Namely, the region 
understood as a holon and a system can find its place in the study of general spatial 
laws. 
 
3. Regional geography in the 21
st
 century  
 
At the beginning of the 21st century, there was more talk in geographical circles about 
the absence of geographers from public debates on topical issues. This discussion was 
originally initiated in the United States, where a very low level of geographical literacy 
and knowledge of geographical facts was observed in the general public. There are 
many indications that regional geography has the greatest potential to reaffirm 
geographical views in the general public and contribute to a greater presence of 
geography in public space. Some authors claim that the revived interest in regional 
geography and the man-nature relationship can bear fruit, both in the academic and 
in the popular spheres. It has been observed that traditional regional geographers, 
although they have been burdened with a bad reputation since the time of the 
quantitative revolution, can very easily attract and arouse interest of a large number 
of college students. In addition, their work and knowledge are appreciated by a 
number of government agencies and private companies. Back in the 1980s, some 

Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020 
85 
geographers warned that in the event that regional geography was not reinstated to 
its rightful place within the system of geographical studies, one crucial segment of 
geography could become lost irretrievably. This would create a vacuum, which would 
be exploited by other disciplines (Murphy et al. 2005). 
 
In this light, it is worth noting that most people come into first contact with geography 
through regional content, through education or popular media. In this way, geography 
gains a large number of admirers; so, there have been growing differences over time 
in the understanding of this scientific discipline between professional geographers and 
laymen. The well-informed segment of the public still believes that geographers have 
a specific approach to the study of foreign and distant places, as well as of spatial 
relations on the national level, and that due to this comprehensive and complex view 
they are capable of explaining ‘how the world work’ (Murphy et al. 2005). The 
explanation for this phenomenon can be found in the establishment of regional 
geography as an important field of general education, which is widely recognized as 
such, although it is sometimes misperceived as a synonym for the overall geography. 
This claim is also supported by the fact that the publication of popular geographical 
studies, textbooks and atlases, which essentially have a regional character, has not 
experienced a declining trend. Some authors also attach importance to regional 
geography in terms of breaking the established Eurocentric view of the world (Mayhew 
2009). 
 
The future of regional geography is quite uncertain. New global processes open new 
horizons and directions in which this discipline can be further developed. Their impact 
is highly variable in different local or regional environments, and this fact can be 
understood as an opportunity for regional geography to confirm its scientific validity 
and competence. However, many contemporary regional geographers warn again that 
this discipline should by no means deal exclusively with description, but must at least 
include an explanation of regional phenomena as well (Murphy and O’Laughlin, 2009). 
The reality that also must be taken into account is that regions are in a constant 
process of transformation, and that they are not an isolated segment of geographical 
space, neither in the horizontal nor in the vertical understanding of spatial relations. 
In the study of globalization, a special place is dedicated to the relationship between 
global and local; hence the concept of glocalization. However, it is apparent that in 
this type of interaction between the macro and micro levels we can no longer ignore 
the link between them, which is nothing but a region itself.  
 
Regional geography has therefore survived a wide range of trends that have taken 
turns over the past century. They influenced its transformation and pluralization, but 
they did not eliminate it from scientific and educational field. One can even say that 
the regional approach has never been so topical like over the first two decades of the 
21st century, which have been marked by turbulent developments on all geographical 
levels – global, regional and local. Kaplan (2012) also writes about this phenomenon 
in his book ‘The Revenge of Geography’, which triggered a great deal of public 
attention (especially in the United States). Some criticism has been voiced at the 
expense of this work, so, for example, many geographers objected to Kaplan’s revival 
of the deterministic view of geographical reality. It is precisely the transcendence of 
determinism that is one of the factors to be reckoned with when discussing the place 
of the study of environmental elements in contemporary regional geography. The 
balance between falling into the trap of determinism, on the one hand, and neglecting 
an extremely important segment of the region, such as the natural basis, on the other 

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
86 
hand, represents one of the major challenges of this geographical discipline in the 
future, with the already common problems of scientific methodology. 
 
A new era in the development of regional geography was marked by the introduction 
of the Geographic Information System (GIS) into mass use around the world. The 
proliferation of GIS and other types of geoinformation technologies in the field of 
geographical education and scientific research has presented new challenges to 
regional geography, but equally some opportunities too. Svatonova and Mrazkova 
(2010) claim that the use of GIS in the educational process can realize its full potential 
only if students have at least a basic knowledge of regional geography. GIS enables 
much faster, easier and more effective research and study of global and regional 
correlation patterns. The widespread application of GIS technology has also confirmed 
the relevance and importance of regional research, thus definitively rejecting the 
anathema placed on regional geography as a ‘study of the specific’. A number of 
studies have shown that GIS applications are more suitable for perceiving and solving 
problems in a clearly defined (spatial) context, than for elucidating general laws or 
theories. According to Biebrach (2007), this fact can be understood in a positive as 
well as a negative way. Methods by which generalization is performed on the basis of 
specific cases are quite questionable, but with the development of geoinformation 
models and the improvement of geographical skills, it is possible to achieve significant 
progress in this field as well. 
 
Montello (2003) predicts further growth in the importance of the region as a concept 
with the development of digital geoinformation systems and science. The quantitative 
approach applied in this framework may modify the role of the region, but not lead to 
its conceptual removal. This claim is based not only on the fact that geodata 
processing and analytical methods have some basis in the principles of pre-digital 
regionalization, but also on the usability that regionalization methodology still has. 
The concept of regionalization is still quite effective and practical in the context of 
human cognition, even within the digital representation of geographical reality and 
computer-generated analyses. Thus for example studying the world geography in this 
way allows students to acquire knowledge about the special characteristics of places 
and regions in a geographical way. In this way, they can expand their understanding 
of the problems facing human communities on the local, regional and national levels. 
The main goal of the regional approach in geographical education has been and still 
is to get a holistic view of a constantly evolving world, by exploring the diversity and 
interconnectedness of geographical phenomena and processes. Learning the world 
regional geography can also contribute to a better understanding of the geographical 
aspects of cultural diversity, and shape attitudes towards other people and places on 
the planet Earth (Jo et al. 2016).  
 
4. Conclusion  
 
Despite the controversial trends present during the second half of the 20th century, 
it is clear that the development of modern geographical science, and consequently 
geographical education, cannot be adequately interpreted without properly 
positioning the regional studies within the same context. Removal of the regional 
concept from the essence of geographical ways of dealing with phenomena and 
processes in geospatial context brings the natural-social dichotomy to the fore, which 
can only result in the continuation of divergent processes within geography. Regional 
geography is of great importance, especially from the educational point of view, since 
it maintains a clear connection between physical and human elements on Earth, while 

Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020 
87 
at the same time it stands out strikingly as the main method of how to get acquainted 
with the spatial characteristics of different parts of the Earth’s surface, thus 
contributing most to the popularization of a wider geographical scientific field. 
Accordingly, the regional approach forms the basis of school geography in many 
countries around the world, including Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, regional 
geography should not be viewed exclusively through the prism of an idiographic 
concept, i.e. a study of specificity, which is often the case. Because of that, traditional 
approach to teaching usually does not lead to the development of higher cognitive 
abilities in students, such as acquisition of conceptual knowledge and procedural skills. 
Through the study of regional topics, one should always strive to figure out the general 
spatial correlation patterns and regularities, in which GIS technology can play a 
significant role, since its layered structure corresponds to the regional concept of the 
study of geographical space.  
 
References 
 
Biebrach, T. 2007: What impact has GIS had on geographical education in 
secondary schools? Geographical Association UK. 
www.geography.org.uk/projects  
Getis, D., Getis, J., Fellmann, J. 2000: Introduction to Geography – 7th Edition. 
McGraw Hill, Boston.  
Giddens, A. 1984: The Construction of Society – Outline of the Theory of 
Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge.  
Gilbert, A. 1988: The new regional geography in English and French-speaking 
countries. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 12 (2): 208-228.  
Hart, J. 1982: The Highest Form of the Geographer’s Art. Annals of the Association 
of American Geographers, Vol. 72 (1): 1-29.  
Jo, I. J., Hong, J. E., Verma, K. 2016: Facilitating spatial thinking in world 
geography using Web-based GIS. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 
40 (3): 442-459.  
Kaplan, R. 2012: The Revenge of Geography. Random House, New York.  
Mayhew, S. 2009: Oxford Dictionary of Geography – 5th Edition. Oxford University 
Press, Oxford.  
Mirić, R., Drešković, N., Avdić, B., Efendić, A. 2017: Geografska regionalizacija 
Bosne i Hercegovine u kontekstu promjena u njenoj političko-teritorijalnoj 
strukturi. Zbornik radova Četvrtog kongresa geografa Bosne i Hercegovine.  
Montello, D. 2003: Regions in Geography – Process and Content. Foundation of 
Geographic Information Science: 173-190. Taylor and Francis, London.  
Murphy, A., de Blij, H., Turner, B., Gilmore, R., Gregory, D. 2005: The role of 
geography in public debate. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 29 (2): 165-
193.  
Murphy, A., O’Laughlin, J. 2009: New Horizons for Regional Geography. Eurasian 
Geography and Economics, Vol. 50 (3): 241-251.  
Nir, D. 1990: Region as a Socio-environmental System – An Introduction to a 
Systemic Regional Geography. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.  
Nurković, S., Mirić, R. 2005: Osvrt na geografsku regionalizaciju Bosne i 
Hercegovine. Geografski radovi, Vol. 1.  
Passi, A. 1986: The institutionalization of region: A theoretical framework for 
understanding the emergence of region and the constitution of regional identity. 
Fennia, Vol. 164: 105-146.  
Passi, A. 1991: Deconstructing regions – Notes on the scales of spatial life. 
Environment and Planning A, Vol. 23: 239-256.  

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
88 
Pudup, M. 1988: Arguments within regional geography. Progress in Human 
Geography, Vol. 12: 369-390.  
Sadiković, E. 2014: Evropa regija – Kohezijska politika Evropske unije i Zapadni 
Balkan. Šahinpašić, Sarajevo.  
Sayer, A. 1989: The ‘new’ regional geography and problems of narrative. 
Environment and Planning D – Society and Space, Vol. 7: 253-276.  
Svatoňová, H., Mrázková, K. 2010: Geoinformation Technologies: New Opportunities 
in Geography Education? Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher 
Research And Innovation): 331-347. Faculty of Education, University of 
Ljubljana, Ljubljana.  
Vresk, M. (1997a): Regionalna geografija danas. Acta Geographica Croatica, Vol. 
32: 69-82.  
Vresk, M. (1997b): Uvod u geografiju. Školska knjiga, Zagreb.  
Wishart, D. (2004): Preliminary Thoughts on Region and Period. Center for Great 
Plains Studies, Linc 
Wood, G. (1999): On the Future of Regional Geography. Geographica Helvetica, Vol. 
54: 199-207. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

Revija za geografijo - Journal for Geography, 15-2, 2020 
89 
POSITIONING OF REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY IN THE MODERN SYSTEM OF 
GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES 
Summary 
 
The quantitative revolution of the mid-20th century marked a period of decadence in 
regional geography, but during the 1980s there was a renewed interest in regional 
studies. One reason for re-actualizing the regional concept lies in the fact that many 
geographers could not fully accept the principles required by quantitative 
methodology, as spatial reality proved too complex to be subsumed under mere 
generic models. Re-emphasizing cause-and-effect relations within the structure of 
social sciences, changes in global circumstances, and more pronounced focus on 
diversity are trends that have affected regional geographers, but also paved the way 
for pluralization within this discipline, as well as geography in general. Emphasis on 
the time dimension, i.e. regional changes that occur over time, especially taking into 
account the genesis of the region, is a feature of many scientific papers that have 
dealt with the modern concept of regional geography. Despite the revitalization of 
regional geography, problems of an epistemological nature within this discipline have 
not been fully resolved. For example, the question of the region as a study object is 
often problematized. A popular dilemma arose from that question: does the region 
objectively exist in real space or is it a mental concept? 
 
The issue of descriptive character also remained one of the most important problems 
of this discipline, although the authors in the field of regional geography constantly 
emphasize that description is only the starting method, and that it is necessary to 
search for general laws on the distribution of spatial phenomena. On the basis of this 
issue, a completely new direction in regional geography has emerged, which was 
additionally influenced by some external factors, such as the restructuring of socio-
economic, cultural and political relations at the global level, with numerous changes 
of local, regional and national character, making regional research very relevant 
again. From this it is evident that the new regional geography, therefore, focuses on 
social structures and processes, often neglecting the natural basis. Other authors, 
however, saw a number of shortcomings in ignoring factor of nature, and began to 
look for a middle ground between traditional regional geography, with the region 
increasingly being studied as a system, which could overcome numerous dichotomies 
and methodological inconsistencies within geography. 
 
There are many indications that regional geography has the greatest potential to 
affirm geographical views in the general public and contribute to a greater presence 
of geography in public space. It is almost paradoxical that regional geography has 
retained a much higher reputation in the public eyes in comparision with geographical 
academic circles. This claim is supported by the fact that the publication of popular 
geographical studies, books and atlases, which in their essence have a regional 
character, did not experience a declining trend even in the period of the quantitative 
revolution, and especially not in the time after it. Regional geography has therefore 
survived all the trends that have changed over the past century. They influenced its 
transformation and pluralization, but they did not eliminate it from scientific and 
educational realm. It can even be said that the regional approach has never been so 
up-to-date as in the first two decades of the 21st century, which were marked by 
turbulent events at all geographical levels – global, regional and local. The 
regionalization concept is still quite efficient and practical in the context of human 
cognition, which is why regional contents still have a very important place in 
geographical education. 

Ranko Mirić et al.: Positioning of regional geography in the modern system of geographical ... 
90