HACQUETIA 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 HAloPHIlE VEgETATIon oF THE sloVEnIAn sEACoAsT: THERO-SALICORNIETEA AnD SPARTINETEA MARITIMAE Mitja kALIgARIČ*,** et Sonja ŠkoRnIk* Abstract Halophile vegetation of the Slovenian sedimentary seacoast have been sampled with the standard Braun- Blanquet procedure. All the 140 collected relevés have been classified using the Syn-TAx 2000 software. The resulting dendrogram separated 5 well-defined clusters, characterized by different dominant species. Two well separated clusters have been further elaborated in this study. The floristically-poor association Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Funari ex géhu et géhu Franck 1984 tend to form monodominate stands with Salicornia europaea s.l. on mudflat hypersaline stands. The association Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928, with high abundance of Suaeda maritima occupy smaller surfaces on drier stands. Both were classified within halophile annual swards of the class Thero-Salicornietea. Spartina maritima-dominated perennial halophyte saltmarshes are represented with association Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et géhu 197 (class Spartinetea maritimae), which colonizes muddy islets, perturbed by high tide and sea turbulence and supports brackish water, which should be rich in nutrients. Key words: phytosociology, halophile vegetation, classification, north Adriatic, Thero-Salicornietea, Spartinetea maritimae. Izvleček S standardno Braun-Blanquetovo metodo smo vzorčili halofitno vegetacijo na sedimentni morski obali v Sloveniji. Vseh 140 zbranih popisov je bilo klasificiranih s pomočjo programa Syn-TAx 2000. nastali dendrogram je ločil 5 dobro definiranih šopov, okarakteriziranih z različnimi dominantnimi vrstami. Dva dobro ločena šopa sta bila nadalje obdelana v tej študiji. Floristično revna asociacija Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Funari ex géhu et géhu Franck 1984 teži h graditvi enovrstnih sestojev z vrsto Salicornia europaea s. l. na muljastih hipersalinih rastiščih. Asociacija Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 z visoko abundanco vrste Suaeda maritima zaseda manjše površine na bolj suhih rastiščih. obe smo uvrstili v razred halofitnih enoletnic Thero-Salicornietea. obmorska močvirja z dominantno vrsto Spartina maritima predstavljajo asociacijo Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et géhu 197 (razred Spartinetea maritimae), ki kolonizira muljaste otočke, izpostavljene plimovanju in valovanju, in dobro prenašajo brakično vodo, ki mora biti bogata s hranili. Ključne besede: fitocenologija, halofitna vegetacija, klasifikacija, Severni Jadran, Thero-Salicornietea, Spartinetea maritimae. 1. InTRoDUCTIon substrate is almost perfectly matching with the ter ritory of Slovenia, only a part, in the Muggia/Milje Slovenia has only 46 km of seacoast, which is under peninsula and bay are lying predominantly in Italy. the pressure of urbanization, tourism and industry Flysch substrate results in a dense hydrological sys(port of koper). Its peculiarity is the geological tem above ground due to its impenetrable prop- substrate. With some exceptions, it consistes of cal-erties. Three streams/rivers have their mouths in careous sandstone – Eocene flysch substrate. This the gulf of Trieste. Alluvial deposits on the mouths * Department of Biology, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, koroška 160, Slovenia, mitja.kaligaric@uni-mb.si, sonja.skornik@uni-mb.si ** ZRS koper, Institute for biodiversity studies, garibaldijeva 1, SI–6000 koper, Slovenia 25 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 resulted in salt–marshes, where probably different vegetation types occurred before human influence. After the Roman period and later, these alluvial coastal regions had been either converted to salt pans or drained (Darovec 1992). nowadays, the situation is only a transitional stage in abandonment and creation of new habitats on the seacoast. Abiotic conditions – shallow coast and large tide area – are in favor of assemblage of the various types of halophyte vegetation, probably similar to the natural types, developed before the human interference. The halophyte vegetation is interesting and important from the conservational perspective, for being threatened by all factors mentioned above. Almost all coastal habitats with different types of halophyte vegetation are listed in Annexes of the EU Directive Habitat 92/4 (1992) (“Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora”). Syntaxonomical classifications of the Slovenian halophyte vegetation are based on the relevés taken by M. kaligarič in the years 1984–87 and years 1998 in 1999, not published so far. Some of those relevés have been taken into consideration also within the last revision of the north Adriatic halophyte vegetation (Poldini et al. 1999). This revision considers already the global revision of Mediterranean halophyte vegetation by géhu et al. (1984), Rivas-Martinez (1990), géhu et Biondi (1995, 1996), Mucina (1997) and géhu (1999). Recent studies of halophyte vegetation, but in the Tyrrhenian district (Latium) have been done by Iberite et Frondoni (1997) and Frondoni et Iberite (2002). Both consider already the revised syntaxonomy. The history of phytosociological assessment in the north Adriatic was started much earlier by Béguinot (1941). The most profound research was undertaken by Pignatti (1966) and followed by Fornaciari (1968). Poldini’s syntaxonomical scheme (e.g. macroassociation “Limonietum venetum”) was adopted also for Slovenian halophyte vegetation in some short contributions about conservational issues of Sečoveljske soline (kaligarič et Tratnik 1981, kaligarič et Wraber 1988), Strunjan (Šajna et kaligarič 2005) and Škocjanski zatok (kaligarič 1997, 1998). The description of Pignatti’s syntaxonomical units is given also within the threat status of halophyte flora and vegetation of the Slovenian seacoast (kaligarič 1996). no analytical or synthetical phytosociological tables from Slovenian halophyte vegetation have been published so far, especially considering the last revision of Poldini et al. (1999). The main aims of the present study are: 1. Elaboration of collected relevés from the Slovenian seacoast with classification methods. 2. Determination of major groups of vegetation (classes and orders) on the basis of classification methods and characteristic species. . Elaboration of the two most distinguishable classes: pioneer annual swards of the class Thero-Salicornietea Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx. 1974 and brackish perennial stands with Spartina maritima of the class Spartinetea maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., géhu, ohba et R. Tx. 1971. 2. METHoDS 2.1 Study area The Slovenian flysch seacoast is predominantly – where still in natural form – composed of cliffs. Bellow the cliffs halophyte vegetation is scarce. The sedimentary coast was converted to salt pans or dried, and in some parts the sedimentary coast is artificially enlarged (soil deposits, salt pans etc.). on the other hand, some salt pans were abandoned and halophyte vegetation spread out. Locations of larger surfaces of halophyte vegetation (Figure 1), where the relevés have been sampled, are the following: Sečoveljske soline (mouth of Dragonja, Fontanigge, Lera, San giorgio channel), Strunjanske soline (Stjuža lagoon coast, salt pans), Škocjanski zatok, mud deposits and coastal grasslands near Sv. katarina/Ankaran. Figure 1: Map of Slovenian Seacoast with locations of the collected relevés of halophile vegetation. Slika 1: Karta slovenske morske obale z lokalitetatmi popisov halofitne vegetacije. 26 MitJa kaligaRič, sonJa ŠkoRnik: HaloPHile vegetation of tHe slovenian seacoast: tHeRo-salicoRnietea anD Spartinetea MaritiMae 2.2 Sampling methods During the years 1984–87 and 1998–1999 phytosociological relevés were taken. They were compiled using the standard procedure of the Braun-Blanquet approach (Braun-Blanquet 1964; Westhoff et van der Maarel 197 ; Dierschke 1994), with combined cover/abundance scale. The phytosociological relevés were classified using the Syn-TAx 2000 software (Podani 2001). A hierarchical classification algorithm (Complete linkage, Euclidian distance) based on quantitative data was employed. The resulting dendrogram separated 5 well-defined clusters, characterized by different dominant species. Further subdivision was carried out with the help of character species. 2. nomenclature Taxonomic nomenclature follows Martinčič et al. (1999) except for species Halimione portulacoides, syntaxonomic nomenclature follows Poldini et al. (1999). . RESULTS AnD DISCUSSIon .1 Classification of the relevés The 140 relevés were classified in 5 main clusters according to species composition and abundance, considering all the species of equal importance (Figure 2). The most diverse is the first main cluster (no.1). It could be further divided in 5 sub-clusters (1A-1E): The first one (A, relevés 1–4) is represented by floristically poor Salsola soda dominated stands on dry trampled muddy soils with stones. Species Elytrigia atherica and Atriplex prostrata indicate relatively dry conditions and lower salinity. Such stands could be classified within the Cakiletea maritimae R. Tx. et Prsg. 1950 class. The third sub-cluster (1C, relevés 15–20) is characterized by dominance of grass Spartina maritima. Abundant species are also Puccinellia palustris and Limonium angustifolium. This group of 6 relevés from the mouth of the Dragonja and coast of San giorgio channel in Sečovlje represent the only relevés with Spartina maritima-dominated stands in Slovenia. Such stands, occurring on brackish waters with high nutrient flux (mouths!), are clearly identified with Spartinetea maritimae class. The remaining three sub-clusters (1B, 1D and 1E) are Juncus maritimus-dominated saltmarsh stands, relatively rich with various halophyte species, among them are also helophytes such as Phragmites communis and character species Carex extensa and Plantago cornuti, not present in other halophilous vegetation types. These relevés (relevés 5–14 and 21–44) are classified within the Juncetea maritimi Br.-Bl. 1952 em. Beeftink 1965 class. The second main cluster (no. 2, relevés 45–67) is characterized by sparsely vegetated Salicornia europaea-dominated stands on mudflats of salt pans, artificially made mud deposits or shallow sedimentary coasts. This vegetation is characterized by annuals Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritima (the latter being less abundant) and perennial grass Puccinellia palustris. It covers large surfaces, but frequently consisting of only a few species (sometimes monocultures of glassworts). It was classified within the class Thero-Salicornietea annual halophyte vegetation. Relevés from the third main cluster (no. , relevés 68–86) have similar characteristics to the previous group. They have the same dominant species but the stands are denser, with monodominant Suaeda maritima and less abundant Salicornia europaea. other present species are characteristic for drier and/or trampled stands: e.g. Elytrigia atherica, Salsola soda, Parapholis incurva, Inula crithmoides and Atriplex prostrata. These stands contain many more species than the previous, Salicornia-dominated stands. Also this cluster is classified within the Thero-Salicornietea class. The fourth main cluster (no. 4, relevés 87–1 7) has many sub-clusters at a lower level of dissimilarity. But the main trait is scarce presence of pioneer annual halophytes (Salicornia and Suaeda) and strong presence and dominance of halophilous scrubs: Arthrocnemum macrostachyum, Halimione portulacoides, Limonium angustifolium, Artemisia caerulescens, also Puccinellia palustris, Inula crithmoides and Aster tripolium. This low shrubby vegetation of relatively dry muddy soil is spread predominantly on abandoned salt pans or higher levels (away from the tide area) of the sedimentary coast. It is classified within the class Arthrocnemetea fruticosi Br.-Bl. et R. Tx. 194 corr. o. Bolós 1967. The fifth main cluster consists of only relevés (no. 5, relevés 1 8–140) and represents a very specific situation. These are stands of Juncus maritimusdominated salt grasslands near Sv. katarina (Ankaran), classified within the Juncetea maritimi class. These grasslands are particularly species-rich (the 27 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 Figure 2: Dendrogram – the result of the hierarchical classification analysis for 104 relevés of halophile vegetation of the Slovenian seacoast. Slika 2: Dendrogram – rezultat hierarhične klasifikacije 104 popisov halofitne vegetacije ob slovenski obali. 28 MitJa kaligaRič, sonJa ŠkoRnik: HaloPHile vegetation of tHe slovenian seacoast: tHeRo-salicoRnietea anD Spartinetea MaritiMae most species rich among collected relevés) with halophytes and halotolerant species. only here occur species like Linum maritimum, Centaurium spicatum, Holoschoenus vulgaris and Sonchus maritimus. The separate clustering of this group of relevés is therefore satisfactorily explained. Within this study only the second and the third main clusters, with relevés representing the class Thero-Salicornietea, and third sub-cluster (1C) of the first main cluster with relevés classified within the class Spartinetea maritimae, will be further elaborated and discussed. .2 Vegetation of annual pioneer halophyte swards Syntaxonomical classification of halophilous vegetation in the Mediterranean was very variable – from one class (Salicornietea Br.-Bl. 19 9) up to seven classes (Poldini et al. 1999). on the basis of different studies across the Mediterranean, European coastal halophyte vegetation is classified in three classes: the annual pioneer vegetation of different glassworts on sandy to muddy soils, poor in nutrients, is classified as Thero-Salicornietea. Within the northern Adriatic only order Thero-Salicornietalia Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx 1974 and alliance Salicornion patulae géhu et géhu Franck 1984 are present and represented with four associations (Poldini et al. 1999). Association Salicornietum venetae Pignatti 1966 is endemic due to endemic species Salicornia veneta and ecologically characteristic for “barene” – shallow muddy islets in the lagoon, a completely natural habitat. Another association, Pholiuro-Spergularietum marginatae Pignatti (195 ) 1966, is characterised by Parapholis incurva and Spergularia marginata, both species being rare in Slovenia and occurring only in small patches, mainly in anthropogenically-driven micro-habitats (e.g. halophilous ruderal stands or margins of salt pans). The fragments of this association were found in Ankaran – Sv. katarina and at the banks of San giorgio channel in Seča, but not sampled. The other two associations, Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Funari ex géhu et géhu Franck 1984 and Suaedo maritimae-Bassietm hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 are Salicornia europaea-dominated and Suaeda maritima-dominated stands, as separately clustered in the dendrogram on Figure 2. .2.1 Association Suaedo maritimae-Salicornie tum patulae Brullo et Funari ex géhu et géhu Franck 1984 (Table 1) This, most widespread annual glasswort association in the Mediterranean (Frondoni et Iberite 2002), is characterized by species Salicornia patula. Since in Slovenia the taxonomy of genus Salicornia is still not cleared, we use the taxon Salicornia europaea in the broadest sense after »Mala flora Slovenije« (Martinčič et al. 1999). But there is a high probability that the most widespread annual glasswort which forms monodominant stands is taxon Salicornia patula. In table 1 the relevés 61 and 62 (present in dendrogram!) were not included, due to the high presence of Puccinellia palustris and weak presence of Salicornia europaea: that combination leads us out of the framework of a “salicornietum”. on the Slovenian seacoast this association occurs predominantly in salt pans, closed muddy surfaces with extreme salinity. Due to homogenous conditions, the surface could reach quite a large extent. It could support periodically very dry conditions (summer) and it is flooded during high tide or rain periods (autumn, spring). These extreme conditions lead to almost monodominant stands. In moister and less salt conditions the grass Puccinellia palustris reaches higher cover values. The occurrence of Suaeda maritima alternates with Puccinellia palustris. It is a quite frequent species, but plants remain tall and poorly branched. Suaeda maritima doesn’t reach high cover values as well. .2.2 Association Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 (Table 2) This association was described from southern France (Braun-Blanquet 1951). Some authors classify it within the Thero-Salicornietea (Ferrari et al. 1985, Poldini et al. 1999), some of them within the Cakiletea (géhu et Biondi 1994, Biondi 1998). our géhu our classification (Figure 2) clustered these relevés close to stands of the Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae association, within the same main cluster. Characteristic of this association is high abundance and cover value of species Suaeda maritima. The form without Bassia is the most widespread and could be interpreted also as facies with Suaeda maritima. The plant architecture of this species is different than in the previous one: plants are taller fully branched and generally well developed. The 29 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 stands are not so extreme in environmental parameters, Salicornia occurs, but less abundantly. The number of species, belonging to different classes, including Cakiletea, is higher. nevertheless this association is incompletely developed within the northern Adriatic, due to the absence of two characteristic species: Cressa cretica is completly missing, Bassia hirsuta has become rare north of Ravenna (Poldini et al. 1999) and it is completely missing on the Slovenian seacoast. . Spartina maritima-dominated perennial halophyte saltmarshes The first relevés of Spartina maritima-dominated stands from the Mediterranean were taken by Pignatti (1952). outside the Atlantic, this species is limited only to sedimentary coasts with low salinity of the northern Adriatic from the Lagoon of Venice to Istria. Pignatti (1966) classified those stands within the order of halophilous scrubs (order Limonio-Salicornietea), but all recent classifications distinguish a separate class Spartinetea maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., géhu, ohba et R. Tx. 1971, which includes north American and European Spartina-dominated saltmarshes. The presence of Spartina maritima in the northern Adriatic is a biogeographic peculiarity. The only stands in the Adriatic and Mediterranean are very alike to Atlantic coasts: low winter temperatures of sea water, foggy winter periods with close-to-zero temperatures, shallow sedimentary coast and relatively high tide amplitude (Mosetti et Bajc 1972). But there exists a possibility that it was accidentally brought from the Atlantic with ships of »La serenissima«‘s very active business with Atlantic Europe (after géhu et al. 1984, Poldini et al. 1999). The floristically poor, but very distinctive stands of Spartina maritima are classified within one association – Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et géhu 197 . . .1 Association Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et géhu 197 (Table ) Spartina maritima is the absolutely dominant perennial in this association. Limonium angustifolium and Puccinellia palustris are also frequent, other species occur only sporadically. The stands are completely natural within the areas of north Adriatic lagoons (Venice, grado). This association colonizes first the stable muddy islets, perturbed by high tide, sea turbulence etc. It supports brackish water, which should be rich in nutrients. Therefore it is characteristic also for estuaries. on Slovenian seacoast it occurs along the San giorgio channel in Seča and the mouth of the Dragonja river, where the environmental conditions are close-to natural with the above-mentioned characteristics. It occurs also in the shallow muddy coast of Debeli rtič near the border with Italy. Due to strong lateral clonal spread of Spartina stricta, possible fragmentation of ramets and dispersal by sea currents, it should be very interesting to find out how patches and/or populations are matching with genotypes. 4. ConCLUSIonS The three associations are represented in the synoptic table (Table 4). We could conclude that associations are defined mostly through dominant species (Salicornia europaea, Suaeda maritima and Spartina maritima) and the absence (rather presence!) of certain taxa. Characteristic species for the four classes of halophile vegetation are distributed across all the three associations. It is very difficult to draw conclusions only on the basis of species presence and cover. The “understanding” of vegetation assemblage is beyond the species combinations and numerical classifications: it should be accompanied with ecological data (salinity, water potential, soil properties, nutrients etc) and functional plant traits. Already Poldini et al. (1999) incorporated into understanding also structural data (life form and growth form of plants). For deeper understanding beyond classification and description, a functional approach is needed – a challenge for further research. 5. ACknoWLEDgMEnTS The research for this paper was funded by the program group “Biodiversity” (P1-0078), the research project “Biodiversity gradient in relation to biogeographic, altitudinal and ecological factors” (J1-6577) and research project “Mapping of Sečoveljske soline and cultivation of autochthonous glassworts” (L1-7001-006), the first two headed by B. kryštufek, the last one by J. nečimer and M. Regvar, all receiving grants from the Slovenian Research Agency. 0 MitJa kaligaRič, sonJa ŠkoRnik: HaloPHile vegetation of tHe slovenian seacoast: tHeRo-salicoRnietea anD Spartinetea MaritiMae 6. PoVZETEk Halofitna vegetacija ob slovenski morski obali: Thero-salicornietea in Spartinetea Maritimae na kratki slovenski morski obali (sl. 1) prevladujejo flišni klifi z le pičlo razvito halofitno vegetacijo ob kamniti obali. Zelo raznolika pa je halofitna vegetacija na muljastih sedimentih, tako naravnih kot antropogenih ali tistih v opuščanju (soline). Halofitna vegetacija je namreč zelo dinamična v času in prostoru, saj se okoljske razmere, ki jo pogojujejo, zaradi človekovega vpliva vseskozi spreminjajo. Popisi, zbrani med leti 1984–1987 in 1998–1999, do sedaj še niso bili klasificirani niti objavljeni. klasificirali smo jih s pomočjo hierarhične klasifikacijske analize iz programskega paketa Syn-TAx 2000 (Podani 2001). Dendrogram (sl. 2) je pokazal 5 lepo definiranih šopov, okarakteriziranih z različnimi dominantnimi vrstami. En šop predstavlja vegetacijo halofitnih trajnic, dva šopa pa halofitne pionirske enoletnice z dominirajočim osočnikom ali lobodko. Četrti šop so morska močvirja z dominantnim obmorskim ločjem. V ta šop so se uvrstili tudi sestoji, ki jih sestavlja obmorsko metličje. Peti šop pa so izolirani popisi halofitnih travnikov pri Ankaranu. V tem članku obravnavamo popise enoletnih halofitov, ki težijo k monodominantnim in floristično revnim sestojem in pripadajo razredu Thero-Salicornietea Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx. 1974, ter popise z dominantno vrsto Spartina maritima, ki pripadajo razredu Spartinetea maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., géhu, ohba et R. Tx. 1971. Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Funari ex géhu et géhu-Franck 1984 (tabela 1) Pionirska vegetacija halofitnih enoletnic na poplavljenih muljastih polojih je zelo ekstremen življenjski prostor, revne mineralne sestave in podvržen spreminjanju vodnih razmer. Prevladuje pionirska vrsta navadni osočnik, manj je obrežne lobodke. Značilna je za bolj vlažne dele solin in druge plitvine. Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 (tabela 2) To je floristično osiromašena združba, kjer dominira obrežna lobodka, osočnika pa je manj. Vrstna sestava je bogatejša kot v prejšnji asociaciji, lobodka pa doseže optimalno velikost in razvejanost. Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et géhu 197 (tabela ) Ta vegetacija je označena z dominanco vrste Spartina maritima, ki je tipična atlantska vrsta z disjunkcijo v Severnem Jadranu. Porašča muljaste otočke v coni plimovanja, v Sloveniji pa je vezana na obrežje in/ali ustje Dragonje in kanala San giorgio v Seči (tudi na Debelem rtiču). na pojavljanje ugodno vplivata odprt sistem (plimovanje, dotok nutrientov) in brakična voda. Tabela 4 prikazuje razlikovanje asociacij glede na dominantne vrste ter prisotnost značilnic 4 razredov halofitne vegetacije, kar je za uvrščanje v višje sintaksone v malovrstnih haloftnih sestojih vedno problematično. Že Poldini et al. (1999) je upošteval nekatere strukturne značilnosti rastlin (življenjsko obliko in obliko rasti), za globlje razumevanje pa je potrebno poznati tudi okoljske parametre in funkcionalne značilnosti rastlin, kar je vzpodbuda za nadaljnje raziskave. 7. REFEREnCES Béguinot, A. 1941: La vita delle piante vascolari. In: La laguna di Venezia. Ferrari, Venezia, , p.5, t. 9 (2): 1– 69. Biondi, E. 1998: Diversita fitocenotica degli ambienti costieri italiani. Boll. Mus. Civ. St. nat Boll. Mus. Civ. St. nat. Venezia 49: 9–105. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1951: Les groupements Végé taux de la France Méditerranéenne. Centre national de la recherché scientifique (service de la Carte des groupements Végétaux) et Direction de la carte des groupements Végétaux de l’afrique du nord, 297 pp + 16. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964: Pflanzensoziologie. grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, Springer Verlag, Wien new york. Darovec, D. 1992: Pregled zgodovine Istre. knjižnica Annales, 1. Ponatis. koper: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko. Primorske novice, 88 pp. Dierschke, H. 1994: Pflanzensoziologie: grundlage und Methode. Stuttgart, Ulmer. Ferrari, C., gerdol R. & Piccoli F. 1985: The halophilous vegetation of the Po Delta (northern Italy ). Vegetatio 61: 5–14. – 14. Fornaciari, g. 1968: Aspetti floristici e fitosociologici della Laguna di grado e del suo litorale. Atti Accad. Sci. Lett. Arti Udine 6: 5–199. – 199. Frondoni, R. & Iberite, M. 2002. The halophile vegetation of the sedimentary coast of Lazio (cen 1 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 tral Tyrrhenian District, Italy). Plant Biosystems 1 6(1): 49–67. géhu, J. M. 1999: Schéma synsystématique des principales classes de végétations littorales sédimentaries européennes avec références a d’ autres territoires holoarctiques. Ann. Bot. (Roma) 56(1): 5–52.– 52. géhu, J.M., Costa, M., Scoppola, A., Biondi, E., Marchiori, S., Peris, J. B., Franck, J., Canglia, g. & Veri, L. 1984: Essai synsystématique et synchorologique sur les végétations littorales italiennes dans un but conservatiore. Doc. Phytosoc. – 474. n.S. 8: 9 –474. géhu, J. M. & Biondi, E. 1994: Végétation du litto- Végétationgétationlittoégétationétation rale de la Corse: essai de synthése phytoso- ése phytosociologique. Braun-Blanquetia 1 : 1–149. – 149. géhu, J.M. & Biondi, E. 1995: Essai de typologie phytosociologique des habitats et des végétations halophiles des littoraux sedimentaries perimediterraneens halophiles des littoraux sedimentaries périméditerranéens et thermoatlantiques. Fitosociologia 0: 201–212. : 2 géhu, J.M. & Biondi, E. 1996: Synoptique des as- associations végétales du littoral adriatique ital- égétalesétales ital gétales ien. giorn. Bot. Ital. 1 0 (1): 257–270. – 270. Iberite, M. & Frondoni, R. 1997: Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione del Parco nazionale del Circeo: le comunita a salicornie annuali. Fitosociologia 4: 121–125.– 125. kaligarič, M. 1996 : Threat status of halophyte flora and vegetation. In: gregori, J. (ed.) narava Slovenije, stanje in perspektive, Društvo ekologov Slovenije. Zbornik prispevkov o naravni dediščini Slovenije, Ljubljana: 11 –121. –121. kaligarič, M. 1997: Rastlinstvo Škocjanskega zatoka – deset let kasneje. Falco (koper) 11: 11–12. kaligarič, M. 1998: Botanični pogled na možne ureditve naravnega rezervata Škocjanski zatok. Ann. Ser. hist. nat. 8 (1 ): 1 1–142. kaligarič, M. & Tratnik, M. 1981: ohranimo Sečoveljske soline. Proteus 44: 122–126. kaligarič, M. & Wraber, T. 1988: obmorski lan in klasnata tavžentroža v Sloveniji nista izumrla. Proteus 50: 72– 7 . Martinčič, A., Wraber, T., Jogan, n., Ravnik, V., Podobnik, A., Turk, B. & Vreš, B. 1999: Mala flora Slovenije. ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk. Tretja, dopolnjena in spremenjena izdaja, Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana. Mosetti, F. & Bajc, D. 1972: Una relazione empirica tra l’ampiezza dell’acqua alta a Venezia e la distribuzione della pressione atmosferica sull’ Adriatico. Boll. geofis. Teor. Appl. 21 (1/2): 9–42. Mucina, L. 1997: Conspectus of classes of European vegetation. Folia geobot. Phytotax. 2: 117–172. Pignatti, S. 1952: Introduzione allo studio fitosociologico della Pianura Veneta orientale con particolare riguardo alla vegetazione litoranea. Arch.Bot. 28 (4): 265– 29. – 29. Pignatti, S. 1966: La vegetazione alofila della laguna veneta. Mem. Ist. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti, Cl. Sci. Mat. nat. (1): –147. – 147. Podani, J. 2001: Syn-TAx 2000. Computer Programs for data analysis in ecology and systematics. Budapest. Poldini, L., Vidali, M. & Fabiani, M.L. 1999: La vegetazione del litorale sedimentario del Friuli-Veneziagiulia(nEItalia)conriferimentiallaregione alto-adriatico. Studia geobotanica,17: –68. Rivas-Martinez, S. 1990: Sintaxonomia de la classe Thero-Salicornietea en Europe occidental. Ecol. Medit. 16: 59– 64.– 64. 64. Šajna n. & kaligarič, M. 2005: Vegetation of the Stjuža coastal lagoon in Strunjan landscape park (Slovenia): a draft history, mapping and conservation evaluation. Annales Ser. Hist. nat. (in print). Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel, E. 197 : The Braun- Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R.H. (ed.): ordination and classification of communities. Handb. Veg. Sci. 5: 56–172.– 172. Recieved 2. 2. 2006 Revision recieved 25. 5. 2006 Accepted 2. 6. 2006 2 Table 1: Analytical table of the association Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Furnari ex Géhu et Géhu Franck 1984 Tabela 1: Analitična tabela asociacije Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Brullo et Furnari ex Géhu et Géhu Franck 1984 MitJa kaligaRič, sonJa ŠkoRnik: HaloPHile vegetation of tHe slovenian seacoast: tHeRo-salicoRnietea anD Spartinetea MaritiMae Relevé number 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 63 64 65 66 67 Original relevé number 11 12 13 30 34 14 15 25 16 23 20 21 22 33 24 31 17 19 18 28 29 Fr. (%) Relevé surface (m2) 6010060 30 50 60 80 4010070 30 20 60 60 5010040 60 50 70 60 coverage (%) 60 60 70 70 60 50 60 80 70 60 60 40 40 60 20 50 50 80 50 60 60 Diagnostic species of the associationCl, O, A Salicornia europaea 343233354443342435343 100 Diagnostic species of highersyntaxonomic unitsCl, O, A Suaeda maritima 4334++. . .+++.+.1211+3 76 Others Limonium angustifolium +++21+......++....... 38 Puccinellia palustris ...+..222+.....+..... 38 Aster tripolium +.2+.........1..1.++. 33 Halimione portulacoides +.+++...........+...2 28 Phragmites australis ++..............+.... 13 Sarcocornia fruticosa ....1+............... 14 Elytrigia atherica ....................+ 5 Puccinellia fasciculata ...............1..... 5 Salsola soda ...............1..... 5 Spergularia media ................+.... 5 Legend (legenda): Cl – Th ero-Salicornietea Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et Oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx. 1974O – Th ero-Salicornietalia Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et Oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx 1974A – Salicornion patulae Géhu et Géhu Franck 1984 Table 2: Analytical table of the association Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 Tabela 2: Analitična tabela asociacije Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Br.-Bl. 1928 Relevé number 68697071727374757677787980818283848586 Fr Original relevé number 35 38 39 40 42 52 41 46 47 36 37 48 49 43 45 44 50 51 53 (%) Relevé surface (m2) 30 40 60 30 30 20 50 40 60 40 70 20 40 30 40 40 60 70 30 coverage (%) 80 70 70 80 80 80 40 80 70 60 70 70 70 50 50 80 70 60 60 Diagnostic species of the associationCl, O, A Suaeda maritima 4335553543444333343 100 Diagnostic species of highersyntaxonomic unitsCl, O, A Salicornia europaea +11+...+....+....+. 37 Others (ostale) Aster tripolium ++. . .+.++++. . . .32+1 58 Atriplex prostrata subsp. prostrata ++1+.........112+.. 42 Elytrigia atherica ++.........+1...2.+ 32 Limonium angustifolium ..+.....+++.....+.+ 32 Halimione portulacoides .......++++......+. 26 Salsola soda .......++....++.+.. 26 Inula crithmoides ........+1..++..... 21 Puccinellia palustris 1+.........+......+ 21 Spergularia media .++.............+.+ 21 Artemisia caerulescens ...........++...+.. 16 Sarcocornia fruticosa ........+11........ 16 Phragmites australis .+...........+....1 16 Parapholis incurva ...........+.+..... 11 Dactylis glomerata ..................+ 5 Legend (legenda): Cl – Th ero-Salicornietea Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et Oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx. 1974O – Th ero-Salicornietalia Pignatti ex Tx. in Tx. et Oberdorfer 1958 corr. Tx 1974A – Salicornion patulae Géhu et Géhu Franck 1984 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 4 MitJa kaligaRič, sonJa ŠkoRnik: HaloPHile vegetation of tHe slovenian seacoast: tHeRo-salicoRnietea anD Spartinetea MaritiMae Table 3: Analytical table of the association Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et Géhu 1973 Tabela 3: Analitična tabela asociacije Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae (Pignatti 1966) Beeft. et Géhu 1973 Relevé number 15 16 17 18 19 20 Fr Original relevé number 5 7109 6 8 (%) Relevé surface (m2) 20 30 10 20 20 30 Coverage (%) 80 90 80 80 70 80 Diagnostic species of the association Cl. O. A Spartina maritima 454334 100 Limonium angustifolium 1 . +21+ 83 Others (ostale) Puccinellia palustris . 1+2++ 83 Aster tripolium . . .+1. 33 Suaeda maritima . .+1. . 33 Sarcocornia fruticosa +..... 16 Phragmites australis ...1.. 16 Legend (legenda): Cl – Spartinietea maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., Géhu, Ohba et R. Tx. 1971 O – Spartinetalia maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., Géhu, Ohba et R. Tx. 1971 A – Spartinion maritimae (R. Tx. 1961) Beeft., Géhu, Ohba et R. Tx. 1971 5 Hacquetia 5/1 • 2006, 25–36 Table 4: Synoptic table of the assiocations of the classes Thero-Salicornietea and Spartinetea maritimae.Values in the table correspond to the relative frequencies (in percentage) of the species in presented group of relevés. Tabela 4: Sintetična tabela asociacij razreda Thero-Salicornietea in Spartinetea maritimae. Vrednosti v tabeli ustrezajo frekvencam (v odstotkih) pojavljanja vrst v predstavljenih skupinah popisov. Association Sm-Sp Sm-Bh Number of relevés 23 19 Ass. char. and diff. species Ch1(Cl1, O1, A1) Salicornia europaea 100 (3-5) 37 (+-1) Ch2(Cl1, O1, A1) Suaeda maritima 70 (+-4) 100 (3-5) Ch3(Cl2,O2,A2) Spartina maritima . . D3(AF) Limonium angustifolium 35 (+-2) 32 (+) Arthrocnemetea fruticosi Br.-Bl. et R. Tx. 1943 corr O. Bolós 1967 Sarcocornia fruticosa 9 (+-1) 16 (+-1) Halimione portulacoides 26 (+-2) 26 (+) Inula crithmoides . 21 (+-1) Artemisia caerulescens . 16 (+) Juncetea maritimi Br.-Bl. 1952 em. Beeftink 1965 Puccinellia palustris 35 (+-2) 21 (+-1) Aster tripolium 30 (+-2) 58 (+-3) Elytrigia atherica 4 (+) 32 (+-2) Cakiletea maritimae R. Tx. et Prsg. 1950 Spergularia marina . 21 (+) Salsola soda 4 (1) 26 (+) Atriplex prostrata subsp. prostrata . 42 (+-2) Others (ostale) Phragmites australis 13 (+) 16 (+-1) Puccinellia fasciculata 4 (1) . Spergularia media 4 (+) 11 (+) Parapholis incurva . . Dactylis glomerata . 5 (+) Legend (legenda): Sm-Sp: Suaedo maritimae-Salicornietum patulae Sm-Bh: Suaedo maritimae-Bassietum hirsutae Li-Sp: Limonio-Spartinetum maritimae Ch1-3: Ass. char. species (značilnice asociacij) D: differential species (razlikovalnice asociacij) Cl1: Thero-Salicornietea Cl2: Spartinetea maritimae O1: Thero-Salicornietalia O2: Spartinetalia maritimae A1: Salicornion patulae A2. Spartinion maritimae Li-Sp 6 . 33 (+-1) 100 (3-5) 83 (+-2) 16 (+ ) . . . 83 (+-2) 33 (+-1) . . . . 16 (1) . . . . 6