87 KB24 KB200820252016Kurent, Andrejastr. 151-159, 208-209ISSN:1855-5861COBISSID:628991URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8PGIR04VslGV ZaložbaIUS SoftwarePravni letopisparlamentizakonodajazakonodajni postopekNomen est omen|In the past, both the Rules of Procedure of the former Slovenian Assembly and the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly, used the term "fast-track procedure". In 2002, this type of legislative procedure was renamed to "urgent". The question that arises is whether such change of denomination is justified. In fact, it is not clear whether urgent legislative procedure means that a law is to enter into force as soon as possible, or that a law must urgently (i.e. necessarily) be adopted. The term "urgent" is not sufficiently clarified, not even by reference to other legal sources that use the same word. Examples of legal acts that need to be adopted "urgently" are providedTako poslovniki slovenske skupščine kot Poslovnik državnega zbora so do leta 2002 uporabljali ime hitri postopek, od tedaj naprej pa je nujni zakonodajni postopek. Zastavlja se vprašanje, ali je bilo preimenovanje upravičeno, saj ni jasno, ali se z nujnim zakonodajnim postopkom želi doseči čimprejšnja uveljavitev zakona ali pa je zakon nujno treba sprejeti. Pojem nujnosti namreč ni dovolj jasno opredeljen, niti z navezavo na druge pravne vire, ki ta pojem uporabljajo. Primerjalno so navedeni primeri pravnih aktov, ki bi jih bilo "nujno" treba sprejetiTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF