{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW/00555cdf-f214-40f6-be6a-d94ab0f809ea/PDF","dcterms:extent":"186 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW/4e0112d9-ef88-4f4e-8020-21fc5e03c192/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"39 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2007-2026","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2007"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2026"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-REUWXDY1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ars et humanitas"}],"dcterms:issued":"2026","dc:creator":"Fazi, M. Beatrice","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:1"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:20"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 127-140"}],"dc:identifier":["DOI:10.4312/ars.20.1.127-140","ISSN:1854-9632","COBISSID_HOST:285308419","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-A33GO0ZW"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Založba Univerze v Ljubljani"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"alignment"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"anthropocentrism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"antropocentrizem"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"artificial inteligence"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"človek"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"decentring"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"decentriranje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"ethics"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"etika"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"human-centred artificial inteligence"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"osredotočena umetna inteligenca"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"teoretični antihumanizem"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"theoretical antihumanism"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"umetna inteligenca"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"usklajenost"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2007-2026"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Off-centre AI| on alignment, antihumanism and AI ethics|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"This article examines the legacies of antihumanism within the context of artificial in-telligence (AI) research. In response to the ethical risks inherent to the proliferation of quasi-autonomous computational agents, the AI industry, legislative bodies and academia often advocate for a “human-centred” approach that would align AI with human values, desires and goals, ostensibly to make these technologies more transpar-ent and trustworthy. The rhetoric of human-centred AI reveals many of the conceptual limitations that antihumanism had already identified in the foundationalist and sub-jectivist assumptions of Western philosophy. This article considers some of these chal-lenging limitations while also problematizing antihumanism itself. Through Derrida’s notion of “centre” and an analysis of alignment methodologies, the article demon-strates how attempts to decentre the human often reconstitute new forms of authority. It then examines the possibility of surpassing standard anthropocentric approaches in AI while maintaining a critical philosophical engagement with the structurally neces-sary yet precarious character of organizing principles"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ta članek preučuje dediščine antihumanizma v kontekstu raziskovanja umetne inte-ligence (UI). Kot odgovor na etična tveganja, povezana s širjenjem kvaziavtonomnih računalniških agentov, se industrija UI, zakonodajna telesa in akademski svet pogosto zavzemajo za »na človeka osredotočen« pristop, ki bi UI uskladil s človeškimi vredno-tami, željami in cilji, domnevno zato, da bi te tehnologije postale bolj pregledne in za-upanja vredne. Retorika o UI, osredotočeni na človeka, razkriva številne konceptualne omejitve, ki jih je antihumanizem že opredelil v esencialističnih in subjektivističnih predpostavkah zahodne filozofije. Ta članek obravnava nekatere od teh kočljivih ome-jitev, hkrati pa problematizira sam antihumanizem. Z Derridajevim pojmom »sredi-šča« in analizo metodologij usklajevanja članek prikazuje, kako poskusi decentriranja človeka pogosto vzpostavijo nove oblike avtoritete. Nato preučuje možnost preseganja standardnih antropocentričnih pristopov v UI, hkrati pa ohranja kritično filozofsko soočenost s strukturno nujnim, vendar negotovim značajem organizacijskih načel"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW/00555cdf-f214-40f6-be6a-d94ab0f809ea/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-A33GO0ZW"}}}}