195 KB63 KB201320252021Vuga, Tanjaštevilka:3/4letnik:47str. 577-600ISSN:0353-6521COBISSID_HOST:71528451URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-H1HSC7YGslLexperaPodjetje in deloactive insured personsaktivni zavarovanciblindnessdisabled persondodatek za postrežbo in pomočimmovable propertyinvalidinepokretnostPension and Disability Insurance Institutepension beneficiarypodedljivostservice and assistance allowanceslabovidnostslepotatenabilityuživalci pokojninevisually impairedZavod za pokojninsko in invalidsko zavarovanjeDodatek za postrežbo in pomoč| aktualna vprašanja|The right to social security is recognised in international law (e.g. the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 22, International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights, Article 9, European Social Charter, Article 12) as a fundamental human right. It can be defined as the right to security of income provided by public social systems at the time of the most burdensome events in an individual's life. Age, disability and death of the insured are definitely counted among them. The article examines one of the rights that fall within the social security system, i.e. the right to an allowance for assistance and attendance, which is regulated by the Pension and Disability Insurance Act (ZPIZ-2). The beneficiaries of this allowance are exhaustively listed in the Act in two separate articles, i.e. Articles 99 and 100 of ZPIZ-2. The purpose of the allowance is to provide monetary assistance to specifically defined insured persons in order to help them better maintain their basic life functions and prevent them to be neglected in terms of personal hygiene. It is an inalienable personal right that can not be transferred to another and can not be inherited. Thus, only the testator's claim to the allowance for assistance and service shall be passed to the heir, but not the right to the allowance itselfPrispevek obravnava subjektivni obseg arbitražnega sporazuma, ki določa, katere osebe zavezuje arbitražni sporazum. Zaradi načela relativnosti pogodbenih razmerij (veljavnost inter partes) običajno namreč velja, da arbitražni sporazum lahko veže le stranki, ki sta ga sklenili, ne pa tudi tretje osebe. Kljub temu se v praksi pogosto zgodi, da so stranke arbitražnega postopka tudi osebe, ki niso sklenile arbitražnega sporazuma (na primer poroki) ali ki so arbitražni sporazum podpisale v imenu koga drugega (na primer zakoniti zastopnik v imenu pravne osebe, pooblaščenec v imenu stranke). Takšni primeri nastanejo tudi pri cesiji ali odstopu dolga ter pri pravnem nasledstvu. Ne gre pa pozabiti primerov, ko je ena stranka tesno povezana z drugo stranko ali pogodbo, pri čemer ta stranka ni tudi neposredno pogodbena stranka (sklenitev pogodbe v primeru skupine družb). Danes zato niti ni več tako pomembno vprašanje, ali lahko arbitražni sporazum veže tudi tretje osebe, saj je jasno, da je odgovor pritrdilen; vprašanje, ki ostaja, je, pod katerimi pogoji arbitražni sporazum (lahko) veže tudi tretje osebe, saj si arbitražna in sodna praksa glede tega nista enotni, mednarodni in nacionalni arbitražni viri pa tega vprašanja večinoma niti ne urejajoTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of Slovenia