<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8/28b19762-b351-4efd-8a2b-9efd762d2209/PDF"><dcterms:extent>203 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8/4ef875e3-e750-4c61-b798-9f4d0447a645/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>83 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="2008-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">2008</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-E6CMP4CJ" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Damjan, Matija</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 135-162</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1855-5861</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:264801539</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-HTGU3RT8</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Lexpera</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Pravni letopis</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">consumer credit</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Directive 93/13/EEC</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">Direktiva 93/13/ EGS</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">insurmountable obstacles</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kondikcijski zahtevek</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">legal certainty</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">limitation period</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">nepošteni pogodbeni pogoji</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">nepremagljive ovire</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">neupravičena obogatitev</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">nična pogodba</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">potrošniški kredit</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pravna varnost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">restitution claim</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Swiss franc (CHF)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">švicarski frank (CHF)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">unfair contract terms</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">unjust enrichment</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">void contract</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">zastaranje</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="2008-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Zastaranje kondikcijskih zahtevkov iz ničnih potrošniških kreditnih pogodb|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The article examines the statute of limitations for restitution claims arising from void credit agreements denominated in Swiss francs. It outlines the general rules of the Slovenian Obligations Code on the commencement of limitation periods and analyses the criteria developed in judicial practice concerning the limitation of claims for restitution based on void contracts. The general rule on the maturity of claims is supplemented by the introduction of a subjective element - namely, the moment when the consumer becomes aware, or ought to have become aware, of the ground for nullity. The article further analyses the evolving case law of the EU Court of Justice, which permits limitation periods for consumers’ restitution claims but emphasises that such periods may not begin to run before the consumer has had an effective opportunity to become aware of the unfairness of the contractual terms and the legal consequences of nullity. The Slovenian Supreme Court likewise relies on this case law and, in its latest judgments, situates the criteria for the subjective commencement of the limitation period within the framework of insurmountable obstacles under Article 360 of the Obligations Code, linking them to the standard of a diligent consumer. The author presents various potential starting points for the limitation period considered by Slovenian courts and evaluates their appropriateness in light of the case law of both the CJEU and the Slovenian Supreme Court. He warns of the risk of legal uncertainty if subjective criteria are defined too broadly or inconsistently. He concludes that, based on the standard of the average prudent consumer and taking into account the concept of insurmountable obstacles, the limitation period for claims arising from credit agreements in Swiss francs began, in most cases, at the time when widespread media coverage of the potential nullity of such agreements emerged, and the first lawsuits were filed</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Članek obravnava vprašanje zastaranja kondikcijskih zahtevkov, ki izvirajo iz ničnih kreditnih pogodb, nominiranih v švicarskih frankih. Avtor predstavi splošna pravila Obligacijskega zakonika (OZ) o začetku teka zastaranja in v sodni praksi razvita merila o zastaranju kondikcijskih zahtevkov iz ničnih pogodb. Ta splošno pravilo o dospelosti terjatve dopolnjujejo z vključitvijo subjektivnega elementa – trenutka, ko potrošnik izve ali bi moral izvedeti za ničnostni razlog. Avtor analizira razvoj stališč Sodišča EU, ki dopuščajo zastaralne roke za kondikcijske zahtevke potrošnikov, vendar hkrati poudarja, da ti ne smejo začeti teči, dokler potrošnik ni imel učinkovite možnosti spoznati nepoštenosti pogojev ter posledic ničnosti. Na sodno prakso Sodišča EU se opira tudi Vrhovno sodišče RS, ki v zadnji odločitvi merila za subjektivizacijo začetka teka zastaranja umešča v okvir nepremagljivih ovir iz 360. člena OZ in jih povezuje s standardom skrbnega potrošnika. Avtor predstavi različne možne trenutke začetka teka zastaranja kondikcijskih zahtevkov, ki so jih v svojih odločitvah upoštevala slovenska sodišča, in komentira njihovo primernost glede na izhodišča iz sodne prakse Sodišča EU in Vrhovnega sodišča. Opozori na nevarnost pravne negotovosti, če bi bila subjektivna merila zasnovana preohlapno in nesistemsko. Sklepno avtor meni, da se je tek zastaranja zahtevkov iz kreditnih pogodb v švicarskih frankih glede na standard povprečno skrbnega potrošnika in ob upoštevanju instituta nepremagljivih ovir v večini primerov začel v času množičnega medijskega poročanja o možni ničnosti takih pogodb in o prvih vloženih tožbah</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8/28b19762-b351-4efd-8a2b-9efd762d2209/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Inštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HTGU3RT8" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>