341 KB0 KB201820252024F. Rozsnyai, Krisztinaštevilka:2letnik:22str. 185-205, 260DOI:10.17573/cepar.2024.2.09COBISSID_HOST:218453251ISSN:2591-2240URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-R125EH5Ren= University of Ljubljana PressCentral European Public Administration Reviewaccess to justiceadministrative justicedelitev na javno in zasebno pravodifferentiated distribution of competencesdostop do sodnega varstvaporazdelitev pristojnostipublic-private law dividespecialised courts and tribunalsspecializirana sodišča in razsodiščaupravno sodstvoRegulating the competence of administrative justice and the public-private law divide|Purpose: The paper investigates the dichotomy between public and private law in terms of access to justice, especially the distribution of competences between various courts and tribunals. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employs juridical analysis of normative texts and legal comparison. Findings: The continuous expansion of administrative justice calls for a more differentiated yet generalised regulation of access to justice. Academic Contribution to the Field: The analysis addresses policy options regarding the distribution of competences between civil and administrative courts, as well as the potential establishment of specialised courts. Originality/Significance/Value: The analysis of regulatory approaches helps legislators meet the requirements of both timeliness and effectiveness of judicial protection, as well as handle the challenges of blending public and private law instruments to create a regulation that is able to provide effective judicial protection and consistency in case-lawNamen: Prispevek proučuje dihotomijo med javnim in zasebnim pravom z vidika dostopa do sodnega varstva, zlasti porazdelitve pristojnosti med različnimi sodišči in razsodišči. Zasnova/metodologija/pristop: Študija uporablja pravno analizo normativnih besedil in pravno primerjavo. Ugotovitve: Nenehna širitev upravnega sodstva zahteva bolj diferencirano, a hkrati splošno ureditev dostopa do sodnega varstva. Akademski doprinos k znanosti: Analiza obravnava politične možnosti razdelitve pristojnosti med civilnimi in upravnimi sodišči ter morebitno ustanovitev specializiranih sodišč. Izvirnost/pomen/vrednost: Analiza regulativnih pristopov pomaga zakonodajalcem izpolniti zahteve po pravočasnosti in učinkovitosti sodnega varstva ter se spopasti z izzivi združevanja instrumentov javnega in zasebnega prava za oblikovanje ureditve, ki lahko zagotovi učinkovito sodno varstvo in doslednost sodne prakseTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za upravo