<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG/53e737b6-61c0-48c1-bc3e-ad1c694df1e1/PDF"><dcterms:extent>725 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG/5d62dcbe-886e-41be-bef6-33460764092c/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>46 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Jenko, Matej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mencin, Katrina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Novak-Jankovič, Vesna</dc:creator><dc:creator>Spindler-Vesel, Alenka</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:58</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 279-288, XII</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0015</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:190365443</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">abdominalna kirurgija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">intraoperativno spremljanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">multimodalni nadzor</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">oksigenacija cerebralnega tkiva</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">pooperativni zapleti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">spremljanje hemodinamike</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background: Intraoperative fluid management is a crucial aspect of cancer surgery, including colorectal surgery and pancreatoduodenectomy. The study tests if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and duration of hospitalisation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery treated by the same anaesthetic protocols with epidural analgesia. Patients and methods: A prospective study was conducted in 2 parallel groups. High-risk surgical patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly selected in the control group (CG), where standard monitoring was applied (44 patients), and the protocol group (PG), where cerebral oxygenation and extended hemodynamic monitoring were used with the protocol for intraoperative interventions (44 patients). Results: There were no differences in the median length of hospital stay, CG 9 days (interquartile range IQR 8 days), PG 9 (5.5), p = 0.851. There was no difference in postoperative renal of cardiac impairment. Procalcitonin was significantly higher (highest postoperative value in the first 3 days) in CG, 0.75 mcg/L (IQR 3.19 mcg/L), than in PG, 0.3 mcg/L (0.88 mcg/L), p = 0.001. PG patients received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid; median intraoperative fluid balance +1300 ml (IQR 1063 ml) than CG; +375 ml (IQR 438 ml), p &lt; 0.001. Conclusions: There were significant differences in intraoperative fluid management and vasopressor use. The median postoperative value of procalcitonin was significantly higher in CG, suggesting differences in immune response to tissue trauma in different intraoperative fluid status, but there was no difference in postoperative morbidity or hospital stay</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG/53e737b6-61c0-48c1-bc3e-ad1c694df1e1/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-2FWSHLSG" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>