63 KB252 KB40 KB60 KB246 KB37 KB198920252009Decker, Pascal deNewton, Carolineštevilka:2letnik:209 strani / 9 stranistr. 5-13, 74-82ISSN:0353-6483COBISSID:2349251URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-3MI6WYCGenslUrbanistični inštitut Republike SlovenijeUrbani izzivbivalna kulturamodernizemprenovastanovanjska arhitekturastanovanjska naseljavečstanovanjske zgradbeOb padcu utopije| At the fall of Utopia|Immediately after WW2 numerous large-scale housing estates began to spring up. More often than not they consisted of high-rises. Merely 50 years later a great number of these developments are in the process of demolition or are seriously undergoing restructuring. The Modernistic thoughts, inspired by the CIAM (Congres International d'Architecture Moderne) movement and Le Corbusier seem to have lost the appeal they once held. In this contribution we look into this evolution and more specifically, we focus on the misinterpretation ofthe importance of the (symbolic) meaning of housing by the Modernist movement. A misjudgement, that eventually resulted in the speedy dismantling of these estatesPo koncu 2. svetovne vojne so se začele graditi velike stanovanjske soseske. Pogosto so jih sestavljale stolpnice. Številne le 50 let pozneje podirajo oziroma jih temeljito prenavljajo. Modernistične ideje, ki so jih navdihnili predstavniki kongresa CIAM (Congres International d'Architecture Moderne) in Le Corbusier, so izgubile nekdanjo mikavnost. V tem prispevku si bomo ogledali razvoj dogodkov, predvsem pa se bomo posvetili napačni razlagi (simbolnega) pomena bivališča, kakor so ga razumeli predstavniki modernističnega gibanja. Prav to napačno razumevanje je nazadnje pripeljalo do hitrega podiranja teh soseskTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUrbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije