<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R/6d773a97-b4e6-4fe3-93a0-1f84f9f2ce0b/PDF"><dcterms:extent>1026 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R/13e6245a-3dad-441d-85bf-568bec6b51b1/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>40 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Čufer, Tanja</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kern, Izidor</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sadikov, Aleksander</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stanič, Karmen</dc:creator><dc:creator>Turnšek, Nina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zwitter, Matjaž</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:48</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 173-183, V</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:1803643</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Association of Radiology and Oncology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">adenokarcinom pljuč</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">brain metastases</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">EGFR mutacije</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">EGFR mutations</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">lung adenocarcinoma</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">metastaze</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">možgani</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Brain metastases in lung adenocarcinoma| impact of EGFR mutation status on incidence and survival|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">The brain represents a frequent progression site in lung adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to analyse the association between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and the frequency of brain metastases (BM) and survival in routine clinical practice. Patients and methods. We retrospectively analysed the medical records of 629 patients with adenocarcinoma in Slovenia who were tested for EGFR mutations in order to analyse the cumulative incidence of BM, the time from the diagnosis to the development of BM (TDBM), the time from BM to death (TTD) and the median survival. Results. Out of 629 patients, 168 (27%) had BM, 90 patients already at the time of diagnosis. Additional 78 patients developed BM after a median interval of 14.3 months; 25.8 months in EGFR positive and 11.8 months in EGFR negative patients, respectively (p = 0.002). EGFR mutations were present in 47 (28%) patients with BM. The curves for cumulative incidence of BM in EGFR positive and negative patients demonstrate a trend for a higher incidence of BM in EGFR mutant patients at diagnosis (19% vs. 13%, p = 0.078), but no difference later during the course of the disease. The patients with BM at diagnosis had a statistically longer TTD (7.3 months) than patients who developed BM later (3.1 months). The TTD in EGFR positive patients with BM at diagnosis was longer than in EGFR negative patients (12.6 vs. 6.8, p = 0.005), while there was no impact of EGFR status on the TTD of patients who developed BM later. Conclusions. Except for a non-significant increase of frequency of BM at diagnosis in EGFR positive patients, EGFR status had no influence upon the cumulative incidence of BM. EGFR positive patients had a longer time to CNS progression. While EGFR positive patients with BM at diagnosis had a longer survival, EGFR status had no influence on TTD in patients who developed BM later during the course of disease</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R/6d773a97-b4e6-4fe3-93a0-1f84f9f2ce0b/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-3P9TLJ1R" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>