185 KB68 KB200820252025Galič, Alešstr. 61-82ISSN:1855-5861COBISSID_HOST:264793091URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-8KYECZJFslLexperaPravni letopiscourtEU lawinternational jurisdictionjudgmentjudicial functionmednarodna pristojnostpravo EUpriznanje in izvršitevrecognition and enforcementsodbaSodbeSodiščasodiščesodna funkcijaPojem "sodišča" in "sodne odločbe" v evropskem civilnem procesnem pravu?|The definition of the terms "court" and "judicial decision" in European civil procedural law is important for resolving traditional issues of private international law concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial decisions. It is also significant from the perspective of the broader constitutional dimensions of the position of the judiciary and judges in Member States, as well as from the perspective of the possible transfer of jurisdiction in certain matters to non-judicial authorities. It should not be overlooked that the concept of a court in EU regulations in the field of cooperation in civil and family matters is not regulated uniformly. The definition is most restrictive in the Brussels I Regulation, according to which only a court in the strict sense of national law qualifies as a court for the purposes of the Regulation. The definition in the Succession Regulation is broader, allowing for the inclusion of notaries, for example, but only insofar as they can decide on non-contentious matters which do not constitute a judicial function within the meaning of EU law, only if they act pursuant to a delegation of power or work under the control of a court. The broadest definition is found in the Brussels II Regulation, which refers entirely to the jurisdiction of a judicial or non-judicial authority under national law, without imposing any additional requirementsOpredelitev pojmov sodišče in sodne odločbe v evropskem civilnem procesnem pravu je pomembna za odločanje o nekaterih tradicionalnih vprašanjih mednarodnega zasebnega prava glede priznanja in izvršitve tujih sodnih odločb. Pomembno pa je tudi z vidika širših, ustavnopravnih razsežnosti položaja sodstva in sodnikov v državah članicah, pa tudi z vidika morebitnega prenosa pristojnosti v določenih zadevah na nesodne organe. Upoštevati je treba, da pojem sodišča v uredbah EU s področja sodelovanja v civilnih in družinskih zadevah ni urejen enotno. Opredelitev je najbolj restriktivna v Uredbi Bruselj I, po kateri je le sodišče v pravem, ozkem pomenu nacionalnega prava tudi sodišče za potrebe Uredbe. Širša je opredelitev v Uredbi o dedovanju, ki omogoča vključitev na primer notarjev, vendar - če lahko odločajo le v nespornih zadevah, kar ne ustreza pojmu sodne funkcije v smislu prava EU - le če delujejo po pooblastilu ali pod nadzorom sodišča. Najširša pa je opredelitev v Uredbi Bruselj II, ki v celoti odkazuje na pristojnost sodnega ali nesodnega organa v nacionalnem pravu, ne da bi postavljal dodatne zahteveTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF