1290 KB80 KB199920252002Vrečko, Janezštevilka:1letnik:4str. 27-54ISSN:1580-0261COBISSID:18578530URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-9VY8XDPZslDruštvo za antične in humanistične študije SlovenijeKeria (Ljubljana)hamartijaKafka, FranzKafka, Franz: Proceskrivdaprimerjalna književnostSophoclesSophocles: Kralj Ojdipstarogrška tragedijaProblem krivde pri Ojdipu in Josefu K.|The issue under discussion is the hamartia of Oedipus and Joseph K. Originally a fateful error on the part of the hero, it later takes shape as his response to the situation in which he finds himself. But while Oedipus is led to self-punishment as a consequence, Joseph is put to a brutal death. Both heroes experience anagnorisis, and a significant role on their way is played by women, the prophet Teiresias, and the priest in the Cathedral. A comparison of Oedipus' death at Colonus and Joseph's death in the quarry reveals the underlying notions of ritual purity, the dissolution of the ritual, and the difference between fatality and hopefulnessV razpravi primerjamo Ojdipa in Josefa K. s stališča hamartije, najpoprej kot usodne zmote in pozneje kot osebne junakove odzivnosti. Ojdipova samoanaliza in Josefov način življenja, v katerega je neupravičeno posegal "z dvajsetimi rokami", vodita v kazen, pri Ojdipu v samokaznovanje, pri Josefu v brutalno usmrtitev. Pomembno vlogo na poti k anagnorisi imajo pri obeh junakih ženske, prerok Tejrezij in duhovnik v stolnici; primerjava Ojdipove smrti na Kolonu in Josefove v kamnolomu pa pokaže na obredno čistost in na razkroj obreda, hkrati pa se Ojdipova usodnost premakne v območje židovsko-krščanskega upanjaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta, Znanstvena založba