{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX/98a22210-46d2-4c1f-bb58-a1a9cc9e19d6/PDF","dcterms:extent":"909 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX/bda6d1d6-1bc3-41e6-a22e-ff67fbb9ec25/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"80 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-MCCAWXYE"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Acta silvae et ligni"}],"dcterms:issued":"2024","dc:creator":"Ariyanto, Komang","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:135"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 13-26"}],"dc:identifier":["DOI:10.20315/ASetL.135.2","COBISSID:220376579","ISSN:2335-3112","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX"],"dc:language":"en","dc:publisher":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za gozdarstvo in obnovljive gozdne vire"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije, založba Silvae Slovenica"}],"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"institucionalno upravljanje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kmetijsko-gozdarski sistemi"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"skupnostno gozdarstvo"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"trajnostno upravljanje gozdov"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Systematic review of sustainable forest management| integrating community forestry and agroforestry approaches| Sistematični pregled trajnostnega gospodarjenja z gozdovi| integracija skupnostnega gozdarstva in pristopov kmetijsko-gozdarskih sistemov|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"This systematic review addresses the need for integrating social, ecological, and economic dimensions into sustainable forest management to enhance resilience and sustainability. Existing research reveals a gap in understanding community involvement and governance effectiveness. The review synthesizes findings from diverse studies, focusing on community forestry and agroforestry practices. An analysis of 48 peer-reviewed articles and case studies was conducted to identify the best practices and key themes. Results indicate that robust institutions and effective governance are essential for sustainable forest management. Community engagement and education significantly enhance sustainable practices, with fiscal subsidies in forestry proving more effective than agricultural subsidies. Agroforestry emerges as a strategy that boosts agricultural income and biodiversity through improved market access. The conclusions emphasize the need to address social inequalities and urban pressures while fostering community participation for effective forest management. Recommendations include strengthening institutional frameworks, promoting education for sustainable practices, developing targeted policies that address identified barriers, and leveraging community participation in decision-making processes"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ta sistematični pregled se ukvarja s potrebo po integraciji socialnih, ekoloških in ekonomskih dimenzij v trajnostnem upravljanju gozdov za krepitev odpornosti in trajnosti. Obstoječe raziskave razkrivajo vrzel v razumevanju vključevanja skupnosti in učinkovitost upravljanja. Pregled sintetizira ugotovitve iz različnih raziskav, osredotoča se na prakse skupnostnega gozdarstva in kmetijsko-gozdarskih sistemov. Izvedena je bila analiza 48 recenziranih člankov in študiji primerov za opredelitev najboljših praks ter ključnih tem. Rezultati kažejo, da so aktivne institucije in učinkovito upravljanje ključnega pomena za trajnostno upravljanje gozdov. Vključevanje skupnosti in izobraževanje pomembno izboljšujeta trajnostne prakse, pri čemer so ekonomske spodbude v gozdarstvu učinkovitejše od tistih v kmetijstvu. Kmetijsko-gozdarski sistemi se izkažejo kot način, ki povečuje kmetijski dohodek in krepi biotsko raznovrstnost prek tudi preprostejšega dostopa do trgov, saj ti sistemi zagotavljajo večjo raznolikost proizvodov. V zaključkih poudarjamo potrebo po obravnavi socialne neenakosti in pritiskov urbanizacije, hkrati pa izpostavljamo pomen sodelovanja skupnosti. Priporočila vključujejo krepitev institucionalnih okvirov, spodbujanje izobraževanja za trajnostne prakse, razvoj ciljno usmerjenih politik, ki obravnavajo jasno opredeljene ovire, ter sodelovanje skupnosti v procesih odločanja"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX/98a22210-46d2-4c1f-bb58-a1a9cc9e19d6/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-AUJC8HTX"}}}}