167 KB64 KB200820252014Napotnik, Anitaštevilka:1str. 53-73, 178-179COBISSID:14144081ISSN:1855-5861URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-AV3TY8UFslGV ZaložbaIUS SoftwarePravni letopisetažna lastninapooblastilapristojnostisodni postopekstanovanjske zgradbeNastopanje skupnosti etažnih lastnikov v sodnih postopkih|The establishment of floor ownership as a special right in rem has also caused the development of a special community named the community of floor owners which is based on this special right. This community, as a new legal entity in civil law, needs appropriate legal protection. The Slovenian legal order does not allocate to the community of floor owners either the legal capacity or the capacity to sue. There are no rules which would define the appearance of the community of floor owners in civil procedures. These legal lacunas are filled by court decisions which are not harmonized. In general in their decisions the courts are not keen on providing legal capacity for the community of floor owners to enter the procedures. Party to the proceeding, if it is allowed, is based on 76/3 of the Civil Procedure Act (grant capacity to be a party). It would be reasonable for the community of floor owner to be recognized their partial legal capacity and capacity to sue and to be sued. This would enable the community to be identified as a party in civil litigationsZ razvojem etažne lastnine kot posebne pravice stvarnega prava je nastala tudi posebna skupnost, ki temelji na tej pravici, to je skupnost etažnih lastnikov. Tej skupnosti kot novemu subjektu civilnega prava, je potrebno zagotoviti ustrezno pravno varstvo. Slovenski pravni red skupnosti etažnih lastnikov ne priznava ne pravne ne pravdne sposobnosti. Zato tudi nastopanje skupnosti etažnih lastnikov pred slovenskimi sodišči ni urejeno. To pravno praznino sodišča različno zapolnjujejo - na splošno velja, da priznavanju pravdne sposobnosti tej skupnosti niso naklonjena. Kadar pa sodišča dovolijo takšni skupnosti nastopati v sodnih postopkih, se največkrat oprejo na določilo tretjega odstavka 76. čl. ZPP in tej skupnosti podelijo sposobnost nastopati kot stranka (samo) v konkretnem postopku (podeljena sposobnost biti stranka). Za poenotenje sodne prakse bi bilo potrebno tej posebni skupnosti priznati delno pravno in pravdno sposobnost. S tem bi omogočili, da samostojno nastopa v sodnih postopkih, je aktivno ali pasivno legitimiranaTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF