131 KB0 KB200620202007Šerc, Anjaštevilka:1/2letnik:18str. 33-49ISSN:1581-6036COBISSID:1612887URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-DA1MZ653enPedagoški inštitutSlovensko društvo raziskovalcev šolskega poljaŠolsko poljeargumentacijadebatakritično mišljenjeretorikaučenjeDebate as a practice through the prism of the discursive approach|The core idea of the paper originates from the theoretical inspiration of Charland's article "Rehabilitating Rhetoric; Confronting Blindspots in Discourse and Social Theory" and a genuine personal interest in the emancipatory potential of formal debate in social life. Theoretical challenge of this paper is in summation of literature and the main ideas which propose interrogation of rhetorical theory and discourse theory. Both theoretical communities challenge the connection of text and power but through different methods and differing fundamental questions regarding the source of the power deriving from its connection with the text. Rhetorical theory seeks answers inarguments whose power does not derive strictly from reason (logos) but is also partially based in authority (ethos) and emotion (pathos). The interest of the theory is primarily in the praxis which closes interpretative options for the examination of social power through more than this lens. The text remains the sole barer of interpretative options. On the other hand critical theory opens up a new avenue for exploring potential possibilities not only ofdeconstruction but also of forming and legitimizing new approaches to argumentative options in formal debating. Examples will follow from experienceacquired in years of debating and will provide for application of the 'theoretical challenge'Osnovna ideja prispevka izhaja iz teoretskega navdiha ob Charlandovem članku znaslovom "Rehabilitating Rhetoric; Confronting Blindspots in Discourse and Social Theory" in pristnega osebnega zanimanja za emancipacijski potencial formalne debate v družbi. Teoretski izziv prispevka je v povzemanju literaturein glavnih idej, ki predlagajo izpraševanje o retorični in diskurzivni teoriji. Obe teoretski smeri vidita izziv v povezavi med besedilomin močjo, vendar uporabljata različne metode in se razlikujeta v temeljnih vprašanjih o viru moči, ki izhaja iz njene povezanosti z besedilom. Retorična teorija išče odgovore v argumentih, katerih moč ne izhaja le iz razuma (logos) ampak deloma temelji na avtoriteti (etos) in čustvih (patos). Teorija se v prvi vrsti zanima za prakso, ki onemogoča interpretativne možnosti v raziskovanju socialne moči skozi različne prizme. Besedilo ostaja edina interpretativna možnost. Na drugi strani kritiška teorija odpira nov pogled na raziskovanje ne le možnosti dekonstrukcije ampak tudi na oblikovanjein legitimizacijo novih pristopov k argumentativnim možnostim v formalni debati. Sledili bodo primeri iz izkušenj v dolgoletni debaterski praksi, ki bodo prikazali prenos 'teoretskega izziva' v praksoTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaSlovensko društvo raziskovalcev šolskega polja