<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2/6331b100-4ad3-45c2-8b10-3ccceb9141d8/HTML"><dcterms:extent>42 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2/687b43cc-eac2-49fb-8423-3cee06f0369c/PDF"><dcterms:extent>538 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2/2adfa1bf-a660-46cd-8202-a79f3614376b/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>31 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Anderluh, Franc</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fras, Albert-Peter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oblak, Irena</dc:creator><dc:creator>Petrič, Primož</dc:creator><dc:creator>Velenik, Vaneja</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:46</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 145-152, IV</dc:format><dc:identifier>COBISSID:1290619</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Association of Radiology and Oncology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">anus</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Anus neoplasms</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Combined modality therapy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">radiološko zdravljenje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">rak (medicina)</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Survival analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Therapy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">Treatment outcome</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Long term outcome after combined modality treatment for anal cancer|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background. The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of radiochemotherapy in patients with squamous cellcarcinoma of the anal canal treated at a single institution. Patients and methods. Between 1/2003 and 9/2010, 84 patients were treated with radical radiochemotherapy at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia. The treatment consisted of 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mytomycin C), followed by brachytherapy or external beam boost. The toxicity of therapy and its effectiveness were assessed. Results. The treatment was completed according tothe protocol in 79.8% of patients. The median follow-up time of 55 survivors was 53 months (range: 16-105 months). The 5-year locoregional control(LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) rates were 71%, 68%, 81%, 67% and 85%, respectively. No treatment-related mortality was observed. The most frequent acute side-effect of the treatment was radiodermatitis (grade 3-4 in 58.2% of patients). LENT-SOMA grade 3-4 late radiation side effects were observed in 15 (18%) patients. In patients with brachytherapy boost a trend of less late side effects was observed compared to patients with external beam boost (P=0.066). On multivariate analysis, complete clinicaldisease response was identified as an independent prognostic factor for LRC, DFS and DSS, the salvage surgery for LRC and DFS, whereas Hb below 120 g/l retained its independent prognostic value for OS. Conclusions. Radiochemotherapy provides an excellent disease control and the survival with preserving anal sphincter function in majority of patients. Surgical salvage with abdominoperineal resection for persistent or recurrent disease has curative potential</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2/687b43cc-eac2-49fb-8423-3cee06f0369c/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-EG4LHHT2" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>