31 KB3855 KB24 KB198920252005Jankovič, Liljanaletnik:16številka:28 stranistr. 100-107ISSN:0353-6483COBISSID:2233795URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-GPKAW9IAslUrbanistični inštitut Republike SlovenijeUrbani izzivjavnostprostorski razvojprostorsko planiranjespatial planningurbanismurbanizemPlanerski in urbanistični projekti - neavtorski pristop in vprašanje sinergije pri sodelovanju|The article presents the non-author approach to urbanistic and planning projects. The project leader guides the entire project team, yet particular coordinators are also important. Contrary to authorship in architectural projects, in physical planning authorship is often or even always completely shared. Not only because planning projects can change significantly during adoption procedures, but mainly because there are many participating actors (designers, planners, commissioners and/or investors etc.) that are involved in any project''s undertaking. Experience proves that the non-author approach is beneficial for good project management and creation of conditions for constructive cooperation within an interdisciplinary working group and with all the other contributing parties. Two tested examples are presented. Their comparison is very interesting, since the first example shows a project where good cooperation between the client, investor and designers, as well as willing interested public, conditioned quality improvements, while the second (because of the public and consequently against its interests) diminished its quality significantly. Our judgement is that the quantity of the often mentioned necessity of public involvement is actually sufficient. There are noobstacles for public participation in urbanistic and physical planning, as long as the public is interested. Troubles are often triggered elsewhere - howto safeguard the common, public interest before particular publics (e.g. neighbours, the immediately affected etc.)V prispevku je predstavljen pogled na neavtorski pristop pri urbanističnih in planerskih projektih. Vodja projekta vodi celotno delovno skupino, vendar so pomembni tudi koordinatorji vseh sodelujočih, medtem ko je samo avtorstvo pri prostorskem načrtovanju (v nasprotju z avtorstvom pri arhitekturnem projektiranju) mnogokrat ali celo vedno povsem deljeno. Ne samo zato, ker se lahko prostorski projekti skozi postopke sprejemanja precej spremenijo, ampak tudi zato, ker je k sodelovanju pritegnjenih veliko akterjev (projektanti, naročniki in/ali investitorji itn.), ki prispevajo k projektu in ga sooblikujejo. Neavtorski pristop je po izkušnjah osnova za dobro vodenje projekta, za ustvarjanje pogojev za konstruktivno sodelovanje interdisciplinarne delovne skupine in vseh preostalih sodelujočih pri projektu. Predstavljena sta dva konkretna primera. Posebno zanimiva je njuna primerjava, saj je v prvem primeru projekt zaradi dobrega sodelovanja med naročniki, investitorji in projektanti ter zaradi kooperativne zainteresirane javnosti pridobil kakovost, v drugem pa je (zaradi in tudi na škodo javnosti) precej izgubil. Za tolikokrat omenjeno nujnost participacije javnosti v projektih ocenjujemo, da je je pravzaprav dovolj. Za sodelovanje javnosti v urbanističnih in planerskih projektih ni ovir, če le javnost pokaže interes. Problem je pogosto na drugi strani - kako pred eno javnostjo (npr. sosedje, neposredno prizadeti) zavarovati skupni, javni interesTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUrbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije