383 KB51 KB199420242005Laufer, Romainletnik:12številka:4str. 73-88ISSN:1318-3222COBISSID:24649821URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-GVMAYX5NenEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturoJavnost (Ljubljana)argumentacijacommunicationdiplomacijadiplomacykomuniciranjemednarodni odnosipolitične komunikacijeretorikarhetoricConflict and legitimacy in modern democratic societies|The notion of "diplomatic attitude" in rhetoric as defined by Chaim Perelman may be associated with sophistry. However, such a bias raises the more fundamental question of a possible link between diplomatic rhetoric and sophistic, or even sophistry. Could such a link be theorised to help understand international relations? In other words, does the notion of a "sophistic rhetoric" enable us to characterise the rhetorical shape of international relations today?Pojem "diplomatsko stališče", kot ga je v retoriki definiral Chaim Perelman, lahko povežemo s sofistiko. Vendar pa tak predsodek sproža bolj temeljno vprašanje o možni zvezi med diplomatsko retoriko in sofistiko. Je mogoče teoretsko osmisliti tako zvezo, da bi bolje razumeli mednarodne odnose? Z drugimi besedami, ali nam pojem "sofistične retorike" omogoča označiti retorično zasnovo mednarodnih odnosov danes?TEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaEvropski inštitut za komuniciranje in kulturo - EURICOM