<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC/04a2d12f-daea-4461-b1f9-8a63fda64b9b/PDF"><dcterms:extent>937 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC/5158cd93-0134-4bc7-9648-67f5fdd9c593/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Doma, Andrej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gašljević, Gorana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jezeršek Novaković, Barbara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kloboves-Prevodnik, Veronika</dc:creator><dc:creator>Studen, Andrej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zevnik, Katarina</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:1</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:58</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 15-22</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0004</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:189576963</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">biopsija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">biopsy</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">bone marrow</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">diffuse large B-cell lymphoma</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">difuzni velikocelični limfom B</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kostni mozeg</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Detection performance and prognostic value of initial bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma| a single centre 18F-FDG PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy evaluation study|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Detection of bone marrow involvement (BMI) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically relies on invasive bone marrow biopsy (BMB) that faces procedure limitations, while 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging offers a noninvasive alternative. The present study assesses the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in DLBCL BMI detection, its agreement with BMB, and the impact of BMI on survival outcomes. Patients and methods This retrospective study analyzes baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT and BMB findings in145 stage II–IV DLBCL patients, evaluating both performance of the two diagnostic procedures and the impact of BMI on survival. Results DLBCL BMI was detected in 38 patients (26.2%) using PET/CT and in 18 patients (12.4%) using BMB. Concordant results were seen in 79.3% of patients, with 20.7% showing discordant results. Combining PET/CT and BMB data, we identified 29.7% of patients with BMI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting DLBCL BMI were 88.4%, 100%, 100%, 95.3%, and 96.5%, respectively, while BMB showed lower sensitivity (41.9%) and NPV (46.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any gender subgroup, with 5-year OS rates of 82% (total), 84% (female), and 80% (male) (p = 0.461), while different International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups exhibited varied 5-year OS rates: 94% for low risk (LR), 91% for low-intermediate risk (LIR), 84% for high-intermediate risk (HIR), and 65% for high risk (HR) (p = 0.0027). Bone marrow involvement did not impact OS significantly (p = 0.979). Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to BMB. While other studies reported poorer overall and BMI 5-year OS in DLBCL, our findings demonstrated favourable survival data</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC/04a2d12f-daea-4461-b1f9-8a63fda64b9b/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-HJQSADCC" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>