118 KB45 KB200420242019Hlebec, ValentinaKogovšek, Tinaletnik:16številka:2str. 41-55ISSN:1854-0023COBISSID_HOST:36497245URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-JUHNIO2GenFakulteta za družbene vedeMetodološki zvezkiAnketeDružbena omrežjaDružboslovna metodologijaDružboslovno raziskovanjeSocial networksSocial science methodologySocial science researchSurveysMeasuring personal networks with surveys|Like in other fields of inquiry in the social sciences, in social network research the most frequently used measurement method is the survey. Compared with other measurement objects such as networks of opinions, attitudes or values, measurement is more complex and thus often more challenging. Measurement typically occurs in two main phases. First, network units are measured (generated). Second, the relationships among the units and other unit characteristics (e.g. demographic properties) are determined, while some specific questions arise as to whether whole or egocentric (personal) networks are to be measured. In this paper, we limit ourselves to measuring personal networks, especially when compared with different methods for generating networks. There are five basic approaches to generating a personal network: name generator, role generator, event generator, positional generator, and contextual generator. Each is associated with particular research goals, costs (financial, time, respondent burden), advantages, and limitations. Moreover, the complexity and specifics of generating networks mean one must consider the characteristics of data collection modes (e.g. face-to-face, telephone, web). In this sense, we will present the advantages and limits of various methods of generating personal networks, evaluate them critically and comparatively, and illustrate them with often used examplesTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede