<Record><identifier xmlns="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">URN:NBN:SI:doc-NXZG2I0O</identifier><date>2012</date><creator>Del Pup, Lino</creator><relation>documents/doc/N/URN_NBN_SI_doc-NXZG2I0O_001.htm</relation><relation>documents/doc/N/URN_NBN_SI_doc-NXZG2I0O_001.pdf</relation><relation>documents/doc/N/URN_NBN_SI_doc-NXZG2I0O_001.txt</relation><format format_type="issue">2</format><format format_type="volume">46</format><format format_type="type">article</format><format format_type="extent">str. 166-169, VII</format><identifier identifier_type="ISSN">1318-2099</identifier><identifier identifier_type="COBISSID">265949184</identifier><identifier identifier_type="URN">URN:NBN:SI:doc-NXZG2I0O</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association of Radiology and Oncology</publisher><source>Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</source><rights>BY</rights><subject language_type_id="slv">citološka diagnostika</subject><subject language_type_id="eng">diagnostika</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">ginekologija</subject><subject language_type_id="slv">rak (medicina)</subject><title>What sampling device is the most appropriate for vaginal vault cytology in gynaecological cancer follow up?</title></Record>