{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G/f14f44e4-d68e-4f1d-acbc-f7e9370c9761/PDF","dcterms:extent":"165 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G/74cc5090-4d52-4f07-9cb6-20e4787c879c/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"52 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2026","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2026"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-2XUGOISV"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Podjetje in delo"}],"dcterms:issued":"2025","dc:creator":"Žuber, Bruna","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:51"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:8"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 1422-1438"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0353-6521","COBISSID_HOST:262866435","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Gospodarski vestnik"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut za delo pri Pravni fakulteti"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Zveza Društev pravnikov v gospodarstvu Slovenije"}],"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Agencija za energijo"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"alternative dispute resolution"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"alternativno reševanje sporov"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"chain decisions"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"chain disputes"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"direct access to the court"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Energetika"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Energy Agency"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"judicial review"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"neposreden dostop do sodišča"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"obseg sodnega nadzora"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"regulatorne odločbe"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"regulatory decisions"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"restrained judicial review"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"scope of judicial review"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"sodni nadzor"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"verižne odločbe"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"verižni spori"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"zadržana sodna presoja"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2026"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Presoja zakonitosti regulatornih odločb na energetskem področju|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article examines the specifics of judicial review of individual decisions by the Energy Agency, the national regulator in the energy sector, where complex technical, economic, and legal issues intersect. First, it analyses the effects of the legal exclusion of appeal, which guarantees parties direct access to the court. An essential part of the fact-finding procedure is therefore transferred to the court, which affects its procedural position in terms of a more active role in conducting the administrative dispute. The central part of the article first discusses the concept of restrained judicial review. The author concludes that the Slovenian legal system does not provide for this form of judicial review and that any restriction of judicial review is only permissible based on an explicit constitutional legal basis. The court must therefore assess the correctness of the application of legal rules, even when they are based on professional rules. It may not merely follow the interpretations advocated by the sectoral regulator. The national approach differs from the doctrine of deferred judicial review, which has developed in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and applies to decisions with a high degree of technical and economic complexity. Particular attention is paid to chain decisions that may give rise to chain disputes. A particularly important question in these cases is how to ensure the stability of the energy market when a court annuls a chain decision, while also preventing the identified error from being carried over into future legal relationships. Despite the partial legal regulation of these issues, the court will often have to use the institution of determining the manner of enforcement of its decision in order to establish a lawful situation. The article also discusses the limited possibilities for alternative dispute resolution, which are narrowly restricted due to the principle of legality in energy proceedings, and suggests potential avenues for de lege ferenda development in this area"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Prispevek obravnava posebnosti sodnega nadzora nad posamičnimi odločitvami Agencije za energijo kot nacionalnega regulatorja v energetskem sektorju, kjer se prepletajo kompleksna tehnična, ekonomska in pravna vprašanja. Najprej analizira učinke zakonske izključitve pritožbe, ki strankam zagotavlja neposreden dostop do sodišča. Pomemben del ugotovitvenega postopka se zato prenese na sodišče, to pa vpliva na njegov procesni položaj v smislu dejavnejšega vodenja upravnega spora. Osrednji del članka najprej obravnava koncept zadržane sodne presoje. Avtorica ugotavlja, da slovenski pravni red te oblike sodne presoje ne predvideva, vsakršno omejevanje sodnega nadzora pa je dopustno le ob izrecni ustavnoskladni zakonski podlagi. Sodišče mora tako presojati pravilnost uporabe pravnih pravil, tudi kadar temeljijo na pravilih stroke, in ne sme zgolj slediti razlagam, za katere se zavzema sektorski regulator. Nacionalni pristop se razlikuje od doktrine zadržane sodne presoje, ki se je razvila v sodni praksi Sodišča EU in velja za odločitve z visoko stopnjo tehnične in ekonomske kompleksnosti. Posebna pozornost je namenjena verižnim odločbam, ki lahko povzročijo verižne spore. Posebej pomembno vprašanje v teh primerih je, kako ob sodni odpravi posamezne verižne odločbe zagotoviti stabilnost delovanja energetskega trga, obenem pa preprečiti, da bi se ugotovljena napaka prenašala na prihodnja pravna razmerja. Kljub delni zakonski ureditvi teh vprašanj bo moralo sodišče za namen vzpostavitve zakonitega stanja pogosto uporabiti institut določitve načina izvršitve svoje odločitve. Prispevek obravnava tudi omejene možnosti alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki so zaradi načela zakonitosti v energetskih postopkih ozko omejene, in nakazuje možnosti de lege ferenda razvoja na tem področju"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G/f14f44e4-d68e-4f1d-acbc-f7e9370c9761/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ODET828G"}}}}