{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD/cb219513-a6af-4d94-81bd-7e25390b0079/PDF","dcterms:extent":"567 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD/3ee8db20-3bb0-401c-b77f-238594f9220c/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"0 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2013-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2013"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-UTGPB0XA"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Edinost in dialog"}],"dcterms:issued":"2025","dc:creator":"Malmenvall, Simon","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:2"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:80"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 37-53"}],"dc:identifier":["DOI:10.34291/Edinost/80/02/Malmenvall","ISSN:2335-4127","COBISSID_HOST:262112515","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Inštitut Stanka Janežiča za dogmatično, osnovno in ekumensko teologijo ter religiologijo in dialog, Teološka fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Benedict XVI"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Benedikt"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"dialog v Katoliški cerkvi"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"dialogue within the Catholic Church"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"drugi vatikanski koncil"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"hermeneutics of reform in continuity"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"hermenevtika reforme v kontinuiteti"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Second Vatican Council"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Slovenian reflection on the Second Vatican Council"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"slovenska refleksija drugega vatikanskega koncila"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2013-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Benediktova \"reforma v kontinuiteti\" in slovenska refleksija drugega vatikanskega koncila| Benedict’s \"reform in continuity\" and the Slovenian reflection of the Second Vatican Council|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The hermeneutics of the Second Vatican Council as »reform in continuity « was established by Pope Benedict XVI. The Pope judges the mentioned event in the light of conformity with previous councils and the doctrinal tradition of the Catholic Church. The first part of this article is devoted to the conceptual starting points of writing the history of the Second Vatican Council based on the derivation of Benedict’s hermeneutics, especially through the Council’s pastoral constitution Gaudium et spes and discussions of selected contemporary Roman theologians who predominantly share the Pope’s point of view. Meanwhile, the second part of the article is devoted to representative examples of the reflection of Slovenian Catholic leaders and thinkers on the purpose and consequences of the Council. Both in the consideration of the international context and the Slovenian reflection, the tension between »noble « intentions and sometimes »deviant « consequences can be reflected in the light of Benedict’s hermeneutics, which the Catholic Church has not resolved after the Council. The reception of the heritage of the Second Vatican Council therefore appears to be an unfinished process, influenced by internal divisions and the need for further dialogue within the Catholic Church itself"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Hermenevtiko drugega vatikanskega koncila kot »reforme v kontinuiteti« je utemeljil papež Benedikt XVI. Omenjeni dogodek papež presoja v luči skladnosti s prejšnjimi koncili in doktrinarnim izročilom Katoliške cerkve. Prvi del tega članka je posvečen konceptualnim izhodiščem pisanja zgodovine drugega vatikanskega koncila na podlagi izpeljave Benediktove hermenevtike, zlasti s pomočjo koncilske pastoralne konstitucije Gaudium et spes in razprav izbranih sodobnih rimskih teologov, ki pretežno delijo papeževo stališče. Drugi del članka se posveča reprezentativnim primerom refleksije slovenskih katoliških voditeljev in mislecev o namenu in posledicah koncila. Tako pri obravnavi mednarodnega konteksta kakor tudi slovenske refleksije se v luči Benediktove hermenevtike odraža napetost med »plemenitimi« nameni in včasih »odklonskimi« posledicami, ki jih Katoliška cerkev po koncilu ni rešila. Dojemanje dediščine drugega vatikanskega koncila se torej kaže kot nedokončan proces, na katerega vplivajo notranja razhajanja in potreba po nadaljnjem dialogu v Katoliški cerkvi sami"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD/cb219513-a6af-4d94-81bd-7e25390b0079/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Teološka fakulteta"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-OELYHXBD"}}}}