286 KB22 KB196520252011Merhar, Viljemštevilka:1letnik:48str. 136-143, 303ISSN:0040-3598COBISSID:30183261URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-PBYX9PBTslFakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo v LjubljaniTeorija in praksaCapitalismKapitalizemNeoclassical economyNeoklasična ekonomijapolitična ekonomijaSmith, Adam, 1723-1790Ob prevodu dela Adama Smitha Bogastvo narodov|The author of this article intervenes into discussions initiated by the Slovene translation of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations. He argues for such an interpretation of Smith's work that distinguishes those aspects that have been confirmed by the subsequent development of capitalist economies and economic theory from those that have proved to be incorrect either from the viewpoint of subsequent historical development and the development of political economy. He concludes that Smith's legacy should not bear the burden of one-sided and uncritical appropriations of its weak points by neoclassical economics. What is needed, rather, is to base oneself on those authors that have developed the positive points of Smith's legacyAvtor posega v razprave ob izdaji slovenskega prevoda Bogastva narodov Adama Smitha. Opredeli se za takšno branje tega klasičnega dela, ki v njem razločuje tiste vidike, ki jih je potrdil zgodovinski razvoj kapitalističnega gospodarstva in razvoj ekonomske teoretske misli, od vidikov, ki sta jih zgodovinski razvoj in razvoj politične ekonomije ovrgla. Avtor zaključi, da Smithove dediščine ne sme obremenjevati enostransko in nekritično prevzemanje njenih šibkih točk v neoklasični ekonomiki. Potrebna je naslonitev na avtorje,ki so razvijali pozitivno plat njegove misliTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede