<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/589244a5-45a2-404b-bcea-513591c4c9e2/PDF"><dcterms:extent>139 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/7157d855-6972-4983-9a50-662c81f4bec8/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>47 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/5cd1c36e-1a59-4141-ba95-4a82d5427f49/PDF"><dcterms:extent>143 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/f8929b33-8579-443f-9284-c4dfe2ebe6d3/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>47 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1989-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1989</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-KOPPZRAZ" /><dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Jelinčić, Daniela Angelina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tišma, Sanja</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:2</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:31</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 7-25, 78-87</dc:format><dc:identifier>ISSN:0353-6483</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-2020-31-02-002</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:49413891</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Urbani izziv</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">cultural heritage</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">heritage policies</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">heritage sustainability indicators</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kazalniki trajnosti dediščine</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kulturna dediščina</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">politike s področja dediščine</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1989-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Zagotavljanje trajnostne kulturne dediščine z učinkovito javno politiko| Ensuring sustainability of cultural heritage through effective public policies|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Sustainability of cultural heritage is a complex issue and is rarely measured, especially at the project level, mainly due to a lack of universal heritage sustainability indicators. This is why many heritage projects are only partially sustainable. This article defines the concept of heritage sustainability and offers methods to measure and evaluate it. The research presented was conducted on good practice examples analysed in Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, and Spain, which are assessed as strategic projects within specific EU, regional, or local policy instruments. The methodology, which explored possible indicators for evaluating the sustainability of cultural heritage investments, involved desk research and ex post analysis of selected heritage projects funded within a policy instrument, interviews with cultural heritage managers, focus groups, and comparative analysis of best practices analysed. The findings showed the crucial importance of cooperation and broad participation of various stakeholders, excellent cultural management, diversification of funding sources, community involvement and appropriation of cultural heritage by the community, respect for professional standards, innovative solutions, and careful spatial planning in ensuring heritage sustainability. Transferability of good practice examples is challenging because it depends on the local context. In order to be able to measure heritage sustainability at the project level, an all-encompassing set of cultural heritage sustainability indicators is proposed. To justify heritage investments, policy instruments may consider future priorities based on this set of indicators</dc:description><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Trajnostnost kulturne dediščine je kompleksno vprašanje, ki se zlasti na projektni ravni redko meri. Razlog za to je predvsem pomanjkanje splošnih kazalnikov, zaradi česar so številni projekti s področja dediščine samo delno trajnostni. V članku avtorici opredelita pojem trajnostne dediščine ter predstavita metode za njegovo ugotavljanje in presojo. Raziskava, ki sta jo opravili, se je osredotočala na analizo izbranih primerov dobre prakse v Grčiji, Italiji in Španiji ter na Poljskem, Portugalskem in Nizozemskem, ti so bili kot strateški projekti vključeni v posamezne instrumente regionalne ali lokalne politike Evropske unije. Metode, s katerimi sta proučevali kazalnike, ki bi se lahko uporabili za vrednotenje trajnostnih naložb v kulturno dediščino, so vključevale kabinetno raziskavo in naknadno analizo izbranih projektov s področja dediščine, financiranih v okviru posameznih instrumentov politike EU, intervjuje z upravitelji kulturne dediščine, fokusne skupine in primerjalno analizo proučevanih primerov dobre prakse. Iz izsledkov je razviden ključen pomen naslednjih dejavnikov: sodelovanje in široka vključenost raznih deležnikov, dobro kulturno upravljanje, razvejani viri financiranja, vključenost lokalne skupnosti, ki kulturno dediščino vzame za svojo, upoštevanje strokovnih standardov, inovativne rešitve in skrbno prostorsko načrtovanje pri zagotavljanju trajnostne dediščine. Primeri dobre prakse so težko prenosljivi, saj je uspeh prenosa odvisen od značilnosti lokalnega okolja. Za opredelitev trajnostne dediščine na projektni ravni je predlagan splošen nabor kazalnikov trajnostnosti, na podlagi katerih bi bile lahko v okviru instrumentov politike opredeljene prihodnje prednostne naloge in upravičene naložbe</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/589244a5-45a2-404b-bcea-513591c4c9e2/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Urbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-QX1GDG1O" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>