349 KB42 KB196520252017Johannsen, LarsKrašovec, Alenkaletnik:54številka:posebnastr. 45-59, 158ISSN:0040-3598COBISSID_HOST:35064669URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-R7NXPWUTenVisoka šola za politične vedeTeorija in praksaDemocracyDemokracijaNeocorporatismNeokorporativizemPluralismPluralizemPolitical developmentPolitični razvojSloveniaSlovenijaDemocratic critique and development| in search of responsiveness|Democracy in Slovenia is criticised for being unresponsive. A large majority of the electorate has consistently supported core features of the welfare state and democracy but fear retrenchments. In search of greater responsiveness in delivering a consensus on social values, the political system has changed from neo-corporatism through majoritarian pluralism to personalist politics. This article compares and contrasts the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the three models. Having gone through three distinct phases of political development in little more than 25 years, Slovenia is an illustrative and prototypical case that offers insights into the pan-European development of personalist politicsV Sloveniji je demokracija kritizirana zaradi neodzivnosti. Večina volivcev sicer kontinuirano podpira glavne značilnosti države blaginje in demokracijo, a se sočasno boji njunega zatona. Da bi se sistem bolje odzival na izražene prevladujoče družbene vrednote, se je spreminjal od neokorporativizma prek večinskega pluralizma do personalizirane politike. Članek primerja in sooča primerjalne prednosti in slabosti teh treh modelov. Upoštevaje razvoj Slovenije, ki je v 25 letih prešel vse te faze, lahko rečemo, da je Slovenija ilustrativen primer in prototip, ki ponuja dober vpogled v vseevropski razvoj personalizirane politikeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUniverza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede