124 KB37 KB200820252021Fink, Mihaštevilka:1str. 51-64, 170-171ISSN:1855-5861COBISSID:79394819URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-RP7LO0TAslLexperaPravni letopisCOVID-19odlokiprekrškiprekrškovno pravorestitucijaSlovenijauradne listinevladni nadzorProblem neveljavnih vladnih odlokov, glob, izrečenih brez pravne podlage, in vprašanja neupravičene obogatitve Republike Slovenije|The spread of the coronavirus across the country has demanded quick actions by adopting individual measures through government ordinances. However, some of these measures were not properly published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. Therefore, the Ordinance on the temporary partial restriction of the movement of persons and the prohibition of the collection of persons for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections was invalid during the period between 3 November 2020 and 5 December 2020 because it had not been properly published in the Official Gazette, as already stated. Therefore, these fines, which were imposed during the period of ordinance invalidity, have no legal basis, and have led to the unjust enrichment of the Republic of Slovenia. The main question dealt with in this paper is whether the publication was suitable or not. The author takes the view that it was not, as the publication of regulations requires precision and, above all, the respect of the Constitution. Therefore, the individuals who have already (unjustly) paid their fines may bring a restitutionary claim against the Republic of Slovenia. This paper also discusses the possible ways and complications which may arise during the procedure of reimbursing the fines that have already been paidŠirjenje koronavirusa po državi je od te zahtevalo hiter odziv pri sprejemanju posameznih ukrepov z vladnimi odloki. Vendar nekateri od teh niso bili ustrezno objavljeni v Uradnem listu Republike Slovenije. Tako Odlok o začasni delni omejitvi gibanja ljudi in omejitvi oziroma prepovedi zbiranja ljudi zaradi preprečevanja okužb s SARS-CoV-2 v obdobju med 3. 11. 2020 in 5. 12. 2020 ni bil veljaven, saj kot rečeno ni bil ustrezno objavljen v Uradnem listu. Zato so bile izrečene globe med neveljavnostjo odloka brez pravne podlage in Republika Slovenija je bila neupravičeno obogatena. Zato je glavno vprašanje v prispevku, ali je bila objava ustrezna. Avtor zastopa stališče, da ni bila ustrezna, saj se pri objavi predpisov zahtevata natančnost in predvsem spoštovanje Ustave. Zato lahko posamezniki, ki so že plačali (neupravičeno) globe, vložijo restitucijski zahtevek zoper Republiko Slovenijo. Prispevek obravnava tudi mogoče poti in zaplete, ki se lahko pojavijo pri postopku vračila plačane globeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaInštitut za primerjalno pravo pri Pravni fakulteti v Ljubljani IPP-PF