<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8/7c3b2152-d5eb-49af-b0d0-cb9a9a727e1c/PDF"><dcterms:extent>557 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8/ed14339b-9475-435e-92cf-eb0171e5c52b/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>0 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Birk, Mojca</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hertl, Kristijana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jarm, Katja</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klaneček, Žan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Krajc, Mateja</dc:creator><dc:creator>Studen, Andrej</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šval, Cveto</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vrhovec, Miloš</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zadnik, Vesna</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:3</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:57</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 337-347</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.2478/raon-2023-0039</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID:167515651</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">breast cancer screening</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">dejavniki tveganja</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">mammography</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">mamografija</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">personalised screening</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">personalizirano presejanje</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">presejalni programi</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">rak dojke</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">risk assessment</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Breast cancer risk assessment and risk distribution in 3,491 Slovenian women invited for screening at the age of 50| a population-based cross-sectional study|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background. The evidence shows that risk-based strategy could be implemented to avoid unnecessary harm in mammography screening for breast cancer (BC) using age-only criterium. Our study aimed at identifying the uptake of Slovenian women to the BC risk assessment invitation and assessing the number of screening mammographies in case of risk-based screening.Patients and methods. A cross-sectional population-based study enrolled 11,898 women at the age of 50, invited to BC screening. The data on BC risk factors, including breast density from the first 3,491 study responders was col-lected and BC risk was assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm (version 8) to classify women into risk groups (low, population, moderately increased, and high risk group). The number of screening mammographies according to risk stratification was simulated. Results. 57% (6,785) of women returned BC risk questionnaires. When stratifying 3,491 women into risk groups, 34.0% were assessed with low, 62.2% with population, 3.4% with moderately increased, and 0.4% with high 10-year BC risk. In the case of potential personalised screening, the number of screening mammographies would drop by 38.6% com-pared to the current screening policy. Conclusions. The study uptake showed the feasibility of risk assessment when inviting women to regular BC screen-ing. 3.8% of Slovenian women were recognised with higher than population 10-year BC risk. According to Slovenian BC guidelines they may be screened more often. Overall, personalised screening would decrease the number of screening mammographies in Slovenia. This information is to be considered when planning the pilot and assessing the feasibility of implementing population risk-based screening</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8/7c3b2152-d5eb-49af-b0d0-cb9a9a727e1c/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-SCFPCVC8" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>