<?xml version="1.0"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/" xmlns:wgs84_pos="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:rdaGr2="http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2" xmlns:oai="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741/6becc2cf-2ae9-441f-8852-fa3d9844ba4f/PDF"><dcterms:extent>781 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:WebResource rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741/f067033a-a305-4d19-8046-7e0f0b62f06a/TEXT"><dcterms:extent>32 KB</dcterms:extent></edm:WebResource><edm:TimeSpan rdf:about="1992-2025"><edm:begin xml:lang="en">1992</edm:begin><edm:end xml:lang="en">2025</edm:end></edm:TimeSpan><edm:ProvidedCHO rdf:about="URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741"><dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-FNIFVE9S" /><dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued><dc:creator>Geršak, Živa Miriam</dc:creator><dc:contributor>Geršak, Živa Miriam</dc:contributor><dc:creator>Podovšovnik, Eva</dc:creator><dc:creator>Salapura, Vladka</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zupanič-Pajnič, Irena</dc:creator><dc:format xml:lang="sl">letnik:</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">številka:ahead of print</dc:format><dc:format xml:lang="sl">str. 1-8</dc:format><dc:identifier>DOI:10.2478/raon-2025-0022</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN:1318-2099</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISSID_HOST:233176067</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Croatian Medical Association - Croatian Society of Radiology</dc:publisher><dc:publisher xml:lang="sl">Slovenian Medical Society - Section of Radiology</dc:publisher><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="sl">Radiology and oncology (Ljubljana)</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:subject xml:lang="en">bone density</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">compact and concellous bone</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">CT z dvojinim virom</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">dual-source CT</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">intro-bone variability</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kompaktna in gobasta kost</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kostna gostota</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">kratke in sezamoidne kosti</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="en">short and sesamoid bones</dc:subject><dc:subject xml:lang="sl">variabilnost znotraj kosti</dc:subject><dcterms:temporal rdf:resource="1992-2025" /><dc:title xml:lang="sl">Computed tomography differentiation of compact and cancellous bone tissue in short and sesamoid bones|</dc:title><dc:description xml:lang="sl">Background: Selecting the most suitable skeletal remains for genetic analysis is challenging due to the variable DNA yield across different bone types and within individual bones. Compact bone typically preserves DNA longer, whereas cancellous bones, such as those in the hands and feet, often contain higher DNA quantities. This study aimed to incorporate dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), a technique frequently utilized for assessing bone density in living subjects, into targeted DNA sampling for dry, skeletonized remains by mapping compact and cancellous regions within six small skeletal elements. Materials and methods: A total of 137 bones were analysed using an imaging protocol specifically adapted to highlight the skeletal structure of small bones. This tailored protocol involved meticulous calibration of imaging parameters. Anatomical landmarks for six distinct elements were identified, and regions of interest were selected for bone density measurement in Hounsfield units (HU). Results: Among 461 assessed regions, 312 (68%) were classified as compact bone, and 149 (32%) as cancellous bone. Given the abnormal distribution of data, statistical differences were evaluated using 95% confidence intervals, with significance indicated by non-overlapping intervals. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences between compact and cancellous bone, as well as within each type across different bones. Conclusions: DSCT proved effective in mapping the internal structure of six small skeletal elements in dry, skeletonized remains, underscoring significant intra-bone variability in density. The findings illustrate DSCT's substantial potential for enhancing DNA sampling in forensic and paleogenetic studies, setting the stage for future research advancements</dc:description><edm:type>TEXT</edm:type><dc:type xml:lang="sl">znanstveno časopisje</dc:type><dc:type xml:lang="en">journals</dc:type><dc:type rdf:resource="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785" /></edm:ProvidedCHO><ore:Aggregation rdf:about="http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741"><edm:aggregatedCHO rdf:resource="URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741" /><edm:isShownBy rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741/6becc2cf-2ae9-441f-8852-fa3d9844ba4f/PDF" /><edm:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" /><edm:provider>Slovenian National E-content Aggregator</edm:provider><edm:intermediateProvider xml:lang="en">National and University Library of Slovenia</edm:intermediateProvider><edm:dataProvider xml:lang="sl">Društvo radiologije in onkologije</edm:dataProvider><edm:object rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741/maxi/edm" /><edm:isShownAt rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-T94P9741" /></ore:Aggregation></rdf:RDF>