47 KB107 KB35 KB198920252008Mlinar, Zdravkoštevilka:1letnik:197 stranistr. 77-83ISSN:0353-6483COBISSID:2290883URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-UTRH8JVHslUrbanistični inštitut Republike SlovenijeUrbani izzivbivalno okoljedružbeni razvojprostorski razvojprostorsko urejanjeSloveniaSlovenijaspremembestanovanjska arhitekturastanovanjska naseljastanovanjska politikastanovanjske zgradbeInovativnost v stanovanjski gradnji in vloga stanovanjskega sklada| from residence to an integral living environment| Innovativeness in housing construction and the role of the Housing fund| od stanovanja k vseživljenjskemu okolju|This article attempts to contribute to clarification of the conditions and actors impacting innovativeness in housing construction and the management of space. It concentrates on the role of the Slovenian national Housing Fund, which is too restricted and lacks appropriate legal bases and means, and also- according to some evaluations - the aspiration to assert its innovative and developmental role. The Fund is focussed on the financial-economic aspects of providing non-profit housing and housing for the market. Currently attention is primarily directed towards its legal-organizational structure and its transformation into an independent company. This neglects broader consideration of socio-spatial change, developmental directions and values in the context of the information age (Lisbon Strategy), which call for innovative sociological, architectural and urbanistic solutions. Mindsets, legal norms and institutions in Slovenia are lagging behind these changes. Thus, housing is still mainly treated as a discrete segment. In order to perform their task in this new framework, which demands more integral treatment of the everyday living environment and reintegration of living, work and recreation, the mandate of the housing fundsmust no longer be confined merely to housing. Several examples of innovative design as well as their limitations are presented, together with examples of good international practiceTa članek naj bi prispeval k pojasnjevanju okoliščin in dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na inovativnost v načrtovanju in graditvi stanovanj in v urejanju prostora. Osredotoča se na vlogo Stanovanjskega sklada RS, ki pa je preveč zamejena, tako da sklad nima zakonskih podlag in sredstev, po nekaterih ocenah pa tudi ne ambicij, da bi uveljavljal svojo inovativno in razvojno vlogo. Njegova dejavnost se osredotoča na finančno-ekonomska vprašanja zagotavljanja neprofitnih stanovanj in stanovanj za trg. S programskega vidika pa je v ospredju zanimanje za njegovo pravno-organizacijsko obliko in zanjegovo preoblikovanje v samostojno gospodarsko družbo. Ob strani pa ostaja široko področje družbeno-prostorskih sprememb, razvojnih usmeritev in vrednot v kontekstu informacijske dobe (lizbonska strategija), ki terjajo inovativne sociološke, arhitekturne in urbanistične rešitve. Miselni vzorci, pravne norme in institucije pri nas zaostajajo za temi spremembami, tako da se stanovanje še naprej večinoma obravnava kot ločeni segment sam zase. Če naj bi"stanovanjski" skladi prevzemali naloge v novih razmerah, ki zahtevajo bolj celostno obravnavanje vsakdanjega življenjskega okolja ter reintegracijo bivanja, dela in rekreacije, potem že v zasnovi ne bodo mogli biti več le stanovanjski. Predstavljena je vrsta primerov inovativnih prizadevanj in njihovih zamejitev iz dosedanje prakse, obenem pa tudi zgledi in izkušnje v mednarodnem meriluTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaUrbanistični inštitut Republike Slovenije