9742 KB74 KB198920251993Korošec, Gorazdštevilka:1letnik:14str. 127-151ISSN:0353-4510COBISSID:1161261URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-XU2C2DIPslFilozofski inštitut ZRC SAZUFilozofski vestnikAge of Enlightenmentethicsetikafilozofija politikefrancoska revolucijaKant, Immanuel, 1724-1804lawpoliticspolitikapravorazsvetljenstvoKant, razsvetljenstvo in razvoj ter iztek teorije družbene pogodbe|Paper first outlines basic ambiguities of Kant's political philosophy, which to an important degree are the result of his attitude towards Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Then it compares Kant's theory of social contract as a foundation of an enlightened absolutism, with Hobbes's theory, to point at their similarities and differences, primarily with respect to the right to disobedience and revolt. Author continues with inquiry into Locke's theory of social contract and the question of how the right to revolt is developed and placed in its context. Comparing Locke's and Kant's theory, he points out the main difficulties in Kant's political, moral and legal theoryTekst najprej prikaže osnovna dvoumja Kantove politične filozofije, ki so v veliki meri posledica njegovega odnosa do razsvetljenstva in francoske revolucije. Zatem primerja Kantovo teorijo družbene pogodbe kot utemeljitve razsvetljenega absolutizma s Hobbesovo teorijo, da bi pokazal na njune podobnosti in razlike, predvsem glede pravice do neposlušnosti in upora. V nadaljevanju si avtor ogleda Lockovo teorijo družbene pogodbe in vprašanje, kako je pravica do upora izpeljana in postavljena znotraj njenega okvira, ob primerjavi Lockove in Kantove teorije pa izpostavi poglavitne težave Kantove politične, moralne in pravne teorijeTEXTznanstveno časopisjejournalsSlovenian National E-content AggregatorNational and University Library of SloveniaZRC SAZU