{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS/66e55298-0656-46d3-8697-63458a31ee21/HTML","dcterms:extent":"41 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS/7f99a2e9-4339-4249-80b1-910d636d4030/PDF","dcterms:extent":"191 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS/c8b4510c-961b-44fb-a6f7-4862cf668d81/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"40 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"2006-2020","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2006"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2020"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-QGFSTTZH"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Šolsko polje"}],"dcterms:issued":"2012","dc:creator":"Štrajn, Darko","dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:23"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:5/6"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 65-77, 137-138"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:1581-6036","COBISSID:2532183","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovensko društvo raziskovalcev šolskega polja"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"criticism"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"economics"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"economy"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"ekonomija"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"epistemologija"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"epistemology"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"habitus"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"kritika"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"reproduction"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"reprodukcija"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q9471"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"2006-2020"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Bourdieu in njegovi koncepti|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Was Bourdieu above all a philosopher or anthropologist or, finally, a sociologist? The latter designation prevailed, but it should be kept in mind that any mentioning of sociology in Bourdieu's work is inseparably tied to the notion of reflexivity. Quite widespread work on a number of Bourdieu's concepts (for instance: habitus, social capital, agency, etc.) in direct interpretations of Bourdieu, as well as in applications of his notions in different fields, indicates a productivity of the original Bourdieu's enunciations. It is impossible to talk about definitions in Bourdieu's work, which would describe concepts in a fixed fashion. They are given as a plurality of descriptions in each singular case, since Bourdieu repeatedly defined his concepts anew and he linked them to different contexts; he constantly changed and developed them and he made ever new mutual connections between them. A closer look reveals evidence that his work - which one could comprehend as ever new redefinitions - has actually been the avoidance of any such definitions, which could be easily used instrumentally. Bourdieu had obvious epistemological reasons for this. We can frequently observe attempts to use Bourdieu's concepts, as they lean towards a \"fixed\" definition. Such attempts openly demonstrate that such modified definitions become inoperative. Enunciations, which Bourdieu shaped in, for example, La Distinction indicate his attachment to the structuralist currents that should be recognised for their significant epistemological innovation. Without structuralism, a whole range of theoretical discoveries would be unthinkable. Bourdieu's discourse is, therefore, simultaneously unusually transparent and sophisticated. Its language is very difficult, whichmakes a translator's work especially complicated - as if the (Bourdieu's) text itself keeps reminding a translator that his/her work is also an interpretation"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Ali je bil Bourdieu predvsem filozof ali antropolog ali nazadnje samo sociolog? Slednja oznaka je sicer nasploh obveljala, a treba je upoštevati, da je vsako omenjanje sociologije pri Bourdieuju nerazločljivo povezano s pojmom refleksivnosti. Razmeroma široko ukvarjanje z vrsto konceptov (npr. habitus, socialni kapital, dejavnik itd.), bodisi v neposrednih interpretacijah Bourdieuja bodisi v aplikacijah njegovih pojmov na različnih področjih, kaže na produktivnost izvirnih Bourdieujevih formulacij. O definicijah, ki bi koncepte podajale v fiksni obliki, pri Bourdieuju namreč ni mogoče govoriti drugače kot v množini v vsakem posameznem primeru, kajti Bourdieu je svoje koncepte znova in znova opredeljeval, povezoval z različnimi konteksti, jih spreminjal in razvijal ter medsebojno različno povezoval. Natančnejši pogled pokaže, da je njegovo delo, ki se lahko komu kaže tudi kot vedno vnovično definiranje konceptov, pravzaprav izogibanje definiciji, ki bi bila zlahka instrumentalno uporabna. Za to je imel Bourdieu razvidne epistemološke razloge. Neredko smo sicer priča poskusom nekakšnih aplikacij Bourdieujevih konceptov, ki se opirajo na kako od \"fiksiranih\" definicij, in pri teh poskusih se pokaže, da take definicije postanejo neuporabne. Formulacije, ki jih je Bourdieu oblikoval npr. v La Distinction, opozarjajo na njegovo vpetost v tokove strukturalizma, pri tem pa je treba poudariti, da je nemara največji pomen strukturalizma treba videti v njegovi epistemološki inovaciji, brez katere ni mogoče misliti cele vrste teoretskih odkritij. Bourdieujev diskurz je zato hkrati nenavadno razumljiv in zapleten, jezikovno pa seveda težaven in pri prevajanju se zdi, kot da bi samo besedilo opozarjalo prevajalca na to, da se mora zavedati, da je njegovo početje hkrati interpretacija"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS/7f99a2e9-4339-4249-80b1-910d636d4030/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Slovensko društvo raziskovalcev šolskega polja"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-Y9MRAHYS"}}}}