{"?xml":{"@version":"1.0"},"edm:RDF":{"@xmlns:dc":"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/","@xmlns:edm":"http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/","@xmlns:wgs84_pos":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos","@xmlns:foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","@xmlns:rdaGr2":"http://rdvocab.info/ElementsGr2","@xmlns:oai":"http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/","@xmlns:owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","@xmlns:rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","@xmlns:ore":"http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/","@xmlns:skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","@xmlns:dcterms":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","edm:WebResource":[{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/85fe96df-d828-4b67-a78b-d26405d973ca/PDF","dcterms:extent":"2157 KB"},{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/ca5bc27e-182a-4c3f-902c-ad13ffdea9be/TEXT","dcterms:extent":"62 KB"}],"edm:TimeSpan":{"@rdf:about":"1965-2025","edm:begin":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"1965"},"edm:end":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"2025"}},"edm:ProvidedCHO":{"@rdf:about":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB","dcterms:isPartOf":[{"@rdf:resource":"https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:spr-ETPSIC7M"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Teorija in praksa"}],"dcterms:issued":"2016","dc:creator":["Malnar, Brina","Šinko, Milan"],"dc:format":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"letnik:53"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"številka:posebna"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"str. 42-63, 251"}],"dc:identifier":["ISSN:0040-3598","COBISSID:34360413","URN:URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB"],"dc:language":"sl","dc:publisher":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Visoka šola za politične vede"},"dc:subject":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Družboslovne ankete"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Evropska družboslovna raziskava"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Javno mnenje"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Odprto objavljanje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Open access publishing"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Public opinion"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Social survey"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Uporabniki"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"Users"}],"dcterms:temporal":{"@rdf:resource":"1965-2025"},"dc:title":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Potencial akademske in javnopolitične izrabe družboslovnih podatkov v Sloveniji| primer Evropske družboslovne raziskave|"},"dc:description":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"The article reviews the possibilities and tools for systematic academic and policy utilisation of the European Social Survey findings (ESS) in an international and Slovenian context. The first part discusses the relevance of evidence-based policy and compares several analytical methods for summarising and synthesising the results from a large number of studies for non-academic end-users. Based on bibliographical data, the second part outlines the patterns of ESS academic use across countries, academic disciplines, topics and policy areas in the 2003-2014 period. It proceeds to examine the possibilities of a comparative review of the ESS findings from the perspective of a Slovenian analyst and concludes that the survey offers broad possibilities to evaluate policy orientations, goals and partly measures, particularly in the areas of welfare, economic, immigration and family policies. The article ends with a discussion of access to scientific publications, which continues to present a serious obstacle to non-academic users"},{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Članek analizira možnosti in mehanizme sistematične akademske in javnopolitične izrabe rezultatov Evropske družboslovne raziskave (ESS) v mednarodnem in slovenskem prostoru. V prvem delu izpostavi pomen z dokazi podprtega oblikovanja politik ter primerja različne metode zbiranja in sinteze velikega števila raziskovalnih izsledkov za potrebe neakademskih uporabnikov. V drugem delu na podlagi bibliografskih podatkov predstavi vzorce dosedanje izrabe podatkov ESS po državah, akademskih disciplinah ter tematskih in javnopolitičnih področjih v obdobju 2003-2014. Nato analizira, kje je z vidika slovenskih analitikov največji potencial pregledne izrabe rezultatov ESS, in ugotavlja, da raziskava ponuja široke možnosti za evaluacijo javnopolitičnih usmeritev, ciljev in deloma ukrepov predvsem na področju blaginjske, ekonomske, priseljenske in družinske politike. Na koncu se dotakne problematike dostopa do znanstvenih publikacij, ki za zdaj predstavlja veliko oviro neakademskim uporabnikom, ko gre za pregledne študije"}],"edm:type":"TEXT","dc:type":[{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"znanstveno časopisje"},{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"journals"},{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q361785"}]},"ore:Aggregation":{"@rdf:about":"http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB","edm:aggregatedCHO":{"@rdf:resource":"URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB"},"edm:isShownBy":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/85fe96df-d828-4b67-a78b-d26405d973ca/PDF"},"edm:rights":{"@rdf:resource":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"},"edm:provider":"Slovenian National E-content Aggregator","edm:intermediateProvider":{"@xml:lang":"en","#text":"National and University Library of Slovenia"},"edm:dataProvider":{"@xml:lang":"sl","#text":"Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede"},"edm:object":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/streamdb/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB/maxi/edm"},"edm:isShownAt":{"@rdf:resource":"http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:doc-ZE8P3KSB"}}}}