Bled Workshops in Physics Vol. 18, No. 2 A Proceedings to the 20th Workshop What Comes Beyond ... (p. 217) Bled, Slovenia, July 9-20, 2017 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by the Spin-charge-family Theory — SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1) — Remains in All Loop Corrections N.S. Mankoc Borštnik1 and A. Hernández-Galeana2 * 1 University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 Departamento de Física, ESFM - Instituto Politecnico Nacional U. P. "Adolfo Lopez Mateos". C. P. 07738, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico. Abstract. The spin-charge-family theory [1-11,14-22] predicts the existence of the fourth family to the observed three. The 4 x 4 mass matrices manifest the symmetry SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1), determined on the tree level by the nonzero vacuum expectation values of several scalar fields - the three singlets with the family members quantum numbers (belonging to U(1)) and the two triplets with the family quantum numbers (belonging to SU(2) x SU(2)) with the weak and the hyper charge of the standard model higgs field (± j, ^ j, respectively). It is demonstrated, using the massless spinor basis, on several cases that (why) the symmetry of 4 x 4 mass matrices remains the same in all loop corrections. Povzetek. Teorija spinov-nabojev-druzin [1-11,14-22] napove obstoj četrte druZine k opazZenim trem. Masne matrike 4 x 4 kazejo simetrijo SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1), ki je na drevesnem nivoju dolocena z nenicelnimi vakuumskimi pricakovanimi vrednostmi vec skalarnih polj — treh singletov s kvantnimi stevili druzin (v U(1)) in dveh tripletov s kvantnimi stevili druzin (v SU(2) x SU(2)), ki imajo sibki in hipernaboj higgsovega polja standardnega modela, (enak ± j in ^ j). Avtorja pokazeta, da (zakaj) se v bazi brezmasnih spinorjev, v vec primerih, simetrija masnih matrik 4 x 4 ohranja v vseh redih. Keywords: Unifying theories, Beyond the standard model, Origin of families, Origin of mass matrices of leptons and quarks, Properties of scalar fields, The fourth family, Origin and properties of gauge bosons, Flavour symmetry, Kaluza-Klein-like theories PACS:12.15.Ff 12.60.-i 12.90.+b 11.10.Kk 11.30.Hv 12.15.-y 12.10.-g 11.30.-j14.80.-j 13.1 Introduction The spin-charge-family theory [1-11,14-22] predicts before the electroweak break four - rather than the observed three - coupled massless families of quarks and leptons. * E-mail: albino@esfm.ipn.mx 218 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana The 4 x 4 mass matrices of all the family members demonstrate in this theory the same symmetry [1,5,4,19,20], determined by the scalar fields: the two triplets — the gauge fields of the two family groups SU(2) xSU(2) operating among families — and the three singlets — the gauge fields of the three charges (Q, Q' and Y') distinguishing among family members. All these scalar fields carry the weak and the hyper charge as does the scalar of the standard model: (± \ and ^ 2, respectively) [1,4,22]. Although there is no direct observations of the fourth family quarks masses below 1 TeV, while the fourth family quarks with masses above 1 TeV would contribute according to the standard model (the standard model Yukawa couplings of the quarks with the scalar higgs is proportional to ma, where m^ is the fourth family member (a = u, d) mass and v the vacuum expectation value of the scalar) to either the quark-gluon fusion production of the scalar field (the higgs) or to the scalar field decay too much in comparison with the observations, the high energy physicists do not expect the existence of the fourth family members at all [23,24]. One of the authors (N.S.M.B) discusses in Refs. ([1], Sect. 4.2.) that the standard model estimation with one higgs scalar might not be the right way to evaluate whether the fourth family, coupled to the observed three, does exist or not. The ui-quarks and dt-quarks of an ith family, namely, if they couple with the opposite sign (with respect to the "±" degree of freedom) to the scalar fields carrying the family (A, i) quantum numbers and have the same masses, do not contribute to either the quark-gluon fusion production of the scalar fields with the family quantum numbers or to the decay of these scalars into two photons: The strong influence of the scalar fields carrying the family members quantum numbers to the masses of the lower (observed) three families manifests in the huge differences in the masses of the family members, let say u and dt, i = (1,2,3), and families (i). For the fourth family quarks, which are more and more decoupled from the observed three families the higher are their masses [20,19], the influence of the scalar fields carrying the family members quantum numbers on their masses is expected to be much weaker. Correspondingly the u4 and d4 masses become closer to each other the higher are their masses and the weaker are their couplings (the mixing matrix elements) to the lower three families. For u4-quarks and d4-quarks with the similar masses the observations might consequently not be in contradiction with the spin-charge-family theory prediction that there exists the fourth family coupled to the observed three ([26], which is in preparation). We demonstrate in the main Sect. 13.2 why the symmetry, which the mass matrices demonstrate on the tree level, keeps the same in all loop corrections. We present shortly the spin-charge-family theory and its achievements so far in Sect. 13.4. All the mathematical support appears in appendices. Let be here stressed what supports the spin-charge-family theory to be the right next step beyond the standard model. This theory can not only explain - while starting from the very simple action in d > (13 + 1), Eqs. (13.20) in App. 13.4, with the massless fermions (with the spin of the two kinds Ya and ya , one kind taking care of the spin and of the charges of the family members (Eq. (13.2)), the second kind taking care of the families (Eqs. (13.19,13.35))) coupled only to the gravity (through the vielbeins and the two kinds of the corresponding spin connections 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 219 fields Wab«fac and d>abafac, the gauge fields of Sab and Sab (Eqs. (13.20)) - all the assumptions of the standard model, but also answers several open questions beyond the standard model. It offers the explanation for [4-6,1,7-11,14-22]: a. the appearance of all the charges of the left and right handed family members and for their families and their properties, b. the appearance of all the corresponding vector and scalar gauge fields and their properties (explaining the appearance of higgs and Yukawa couplings), c. the appearance and properties of the dark matter, d. the appearance of the matter/antimatter asymmetry in the universe. The theory predicts for the low energy regime: i. The existence of the fourth family to the observed three. ii. The existence of twice two triplets and three singlets of scalars, all with the properties of the higgs with respect to the weak and hyper charges, what explains the origin of the Yukawa couplings. iii. There are several other predictions, not directly connected with the topic of this paper. The fact that the fourth family quarks have not yet been observed - directly or indirectly - pushes the fourth family quarks masses to values higher than 1 TeV. Since the experimental accuracy of the (3 x 3 submatrix of the 4 x 4) mixing matrices is not yet high enough [30], it is not possible to calculate the mixing matrix elements among the fourth family and the observed three. Correspondingly it is not possible to estimate masses of the fourth family members by fitting the experimental data to the parameters of mass matrices, determined by the symmetry predicted by the spin-charge-family [20,19]. But assuming the masses of the fourth family members the matrix elements can be estimated from the existing 3 x 3 subamtrix of the 4 x 4 matrix. The more effort and work is put into the spin-charge-family theory, the more explanations of the observed phenomena and the more predictions for the future observations follow out of it. Offering the explanation for so many observed phenomena - keeping in mind that all the explanations for the observed phenomena originate in a simple starting action - qualifies the spin-charge-family theory as the candidate for the next step beyond the standard model. The reader is kindly asked to learn more about the spin-charge-family theory in Refs. [2-4,1,5,6] and the references there in. We shall point out sections in these references, which might be of particular help, when needed. 13.2 The symmetry of family members mass matrices keeps unchanged in all orders of loop corrections It is demonstrated in this main section that the symmetry SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1) of the mass term, which manifests in the starting action 13.20 of the spin-charge-family theory [4,1,5,6], remains unchanged in all orders of loop corrections. The massless basis will be used for this purpose. Let us rewrite formally the fermion part of the starting action, Eq. (13.20), in the way that it manifests, Eq. (13.1), the kinetic and the interaction term in 220 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana d = (3 +1) (the first line, m = (0,1,2,3)), the mass term (the second line, s = (7,8)) and the rest (the third line, t = (5,6,9,10, • • • ,14)). Lf = 4>Ym(Prn - X 9AiTAiAmi)^ + A,i {Y_ iJ>YsP0s + s=7,8 { X ^pot , (13.1) t=5,6,9,...,14 where P0s = Ps - 2Ss V&s's"s - 2Sabdabs, p0t = Pt - 2St t""&t't"t - 2Sabt 1, with m € (0,1,2,3), s G (7,8), (s',s") G (5,6,7,8), (a,b) (appearing in Sab) run within either (0,1,2,3) or (5,6,7,8), t runs G (5,..., 14), (t', t") run either G (5,6,7,8) or G (9,10,..., 14). The spinor function ^ represents all family members, presented on Table 13.3 of all the 21 = 8 families, presented on Table 13.4. The first line of Eq. (13.1) determines (in d = (3 + 1)) the kinematics and dynamics of spinor (fermion) fields, coupled to the vector gauge fields. The generators TAi of the charge groups are expressible in terms of Sab through the complex coefficients cAiab (the coefficients cAiab of TAi can be found in Eqs. (13.23, 13.24)2, TAi = X cAiab Sab , (13.2) a,b fulfilling the commutation relations {xAi, xBj}_ = i5ABfAijkxAk . (13.3) They represent the colour (x3i), the weak (x1i) and the hyper (Y) charges, as well as the SU(2)n (x2i) and U(1)n (t4) charges, the gauge fields of these last two groups gain masses interacting with the condensate, Table 13.5. The condensate leaves massless, besides the colour and gravity gauge fields, the weak and the hyper charge vector gauge fields. The corresponding vector gauge fields Am1 are expressible with the spin connection fields &stm Eq. (13.29) Ami = X cAist wstm . (13.4) s,t The scalar gauge fields of the charges, Eq. (13.30), are expressible with the spin connections and vielbeins [2]. 1 If there are no fermions present, then either &abc or d>abc are expressible by vielbeins faa [[2,5], and the references therein]. We assume that there are spinor fields which determine spin connection fields - &abc and d>abc. In general one would have [6]: Poa = faaP0a + 2e {Pa, Efaa}-, Poa = Pa - j Ss s'&s 's'a - 2 Sab & aba. Since the term 2E{Pa, Efaa}- does not influece the symmetry of mass matrices, we do not treat it in this paper. 2 Before the electroweak break there are the conserved charges t1 , t3 and Y := t4 + t23 , and the non conserved charge Y' := -t4 tan2 -&2 + t23 , where 02 is the angle of the break of SU(2)ii from SU(2)i x SU(2)nx U(1)ii to SU(2)i x U(1 )i. After the electroweak break the conserved charges are t3 and Q := Y + t13, the non conserved charge is Q' := -Y tan2 + t13, where 01 is the electroweak angle. 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 221 The groups SO(3,1), SU(3), SU(2)i, SU(2)n and U(1 )n determine spin and charges of fermions, the groups SO(3,1), SU(2)I, SU(2)II and U(1 )II determine family quantum numbers 3. The generators of these groups are expressible by Sab tAi = ^ cAiab Sab , (13.5) a,b fulfilling again the commutation relations {fAi, fBj}_ = iSABfAijkfAk , (13.6) while {xAi,fBj}_ = 0. (13.7) The scalar gauge fields of the groups SU(2)I, SU(2)I and U(1) are presented in Eq. (13.30), the application of the generators of T1, Eq. (13.26), NL, Eq. (13.25), which distinguish among families and are the same for all the family members, are presented in Eq. (13.12). The application of the family members generators Q, Y, t4 and Y' on the family members of any family is presented on Table 13.1. R Ql,r Y . The interaction, which is responsible for the appearance of masses of fermions, is presented in in Eq. (13.1) in the second line Lmass = 2 &ly° (±8) (- L TA AA - L TAi Ai1)^^} + h.c. , + ,- A Ai TA = (Q,Q ',Y') , TAi = (NL, T1 ,T4) , 78 1 Y° (±) = Y° 1 (Y7 ± iY8), aa = L cAt ^st± , ^st± = ^st7 T i^st8 , AA = ^ cAb CDab± , CDab± = cDab7 T i CDab8 . (13.8) ab In Eq. (13.8) the ps is left out since at low energies its contribution is negligible, A determines operators, which distinguish among family members - (Q, Y, t4), the values are presented in Table 13.1 - (/A, i) represent the family operators, determined in Eqs. (13.25,13.26,13.27). The detailed explanation can be found in Refs. [4,5,1]. 78 78 Operators tai are Hermitian, y0 (±) = y0 (t). In what follows it is assumed that the scalar fields AA are Hermitian as well and consequently it follows (AAi) = AAi. 78 While the family operators tu and NL commute with y0 (±), the family 78 78 members operators (Y, Y', Q ') do not, since S78 does not (S78y0 (t) = —Y0 (t) S78). However 78 [^LV (-F) (Q,Q',Y')A(q'q',yVR^ = 78 = VR (Q,Q', Y') A±q,q''y')t Y0 (db) Sk>l = = ^ (Ql, Q,k, Y^,k) A±q,q',y'' 6k)l, (13.9) where (QR, Q,k, Y,^,k) denote the eigenvalues of the corresponding operators on the spinor state ^R. This means that we evaluate in both cases quantum numbers of the right handed partners. In Table 13.2 four families of spinors belonging to the group with the nonzero values of N L and f1 are presented in the technique 13.5. These are the lower four families, presented in Table 13.4. There are indeed the four families of and • All the 2132+1-1 members of the first family are represented in Table 13.3. The scalar fields y0 (t) (Q,Q',Y') 'Y ' are "diagonal"; They transform a right handed member of one family into the left handed member of the same family, or they transform a left handed member of one family into the right handed member 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 223 of the same family. These terms are different for different family members but the same for all the families of the same family member. We shall prove that the symmetry of mass term keep the same in all the orders of loop corrections in the massless basis. Since Q = (t13 + t23 + t4) = (S56 + t4), Y' = (—t4 tan2 0! + t23) and 78 Q' = (-(t4 + t23) tan2 01 + t13), we can use as well the operators (y0 (±) t4 A±, 78 78 ± y° (±) t23 A23, y° (±) t13 A±3). In either case we denote the contributions of these terms as — a^ •^o — 1 ,__78 78 78 2«1 X (Y0 (±) T4 A± + y0 (±) t23 A23 + y0 (±) t13 A±3)^R}5ij + h.c., (13.10) where a means that a particular family member ( a — (u, d, v, e)) is studied. We could make different superposition of these terms. Our proof does not depend on this choice, although each family member has a different value for a*. Transitions among families for any family member are caused by (N ]_ and fH), which manifest the symmetry SUnl (2) x SUTi (2). T13 T23 INL INR f4 uR uR uR UR 03 12 56 78 (+i) +] I [+](+) II- 03 12 56 78 [+i](+) I [+] (+) II... 03 12 56 78 (+i) [+] I (+) [+] II ^ 03 12 56 78 [+i](+) I (+) [-8] I I- 03 12 56 78 - [-i] [+] I [+] [-] I I • • • 03 12 56 78 -(-i) (+) I — [-] I I- 03 12 56 78 -[-i] [+] I (+)(-) I I-- 03 12 56 78 -(-i)(+) I (+) (-) I I" -1 0 -1 0 -1 2 0 2 0 2 -1 0 1 0 -1 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 -1 0 -1 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 -1 2 0 2 0 2 Table 13.2. Four families of the right handed uR1 and of the left handed uR1 quarks with spin 2 and the colour charge (t33 = 1/2, t38 = 1/(2^3) (the definition of the operators is presented in Eqs. (13.23,13.24) are presented (1st and 7th line in Table 13.3). A few examples how to calculate the application of the operators on the states written as products of nilpotents and projectors on the vacuum state can be found in Sect. 13.5. The spin and charges, which distinguish among family members, are not shown in this table, since they commute with NR, Tu and T4, and are correspondingly the same for all the families. 224 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana i > r(3,1) S12 x13 T23 T33 T38 T4 Y Q (Anti)octet, r (/,1) = ( — 1) 1 , r (6) = (1 ) — 1 of (anti) quarks and (anti) leptons 1 uR1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] 1 [+] ( + ) || (+) [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 2 3 2 3 2 uR1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) 1 [+] ( + ) II (+) [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 2 3 2 3 3 dR1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I ( — ) [ —] II (+) [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 3 1 3 4 ¿R1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I ( — ) [ —] II (+) [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 3 1 3 5 dL1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] I ( —) ( + ) II (+) [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 1 3 6 ¿L1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( — ) I ( —) ( + ) II ( + ) [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 1 3 7 uL1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] I [+] [ —] II ( + ) [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 2 3 8 uL1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( — ) I [+] [ —] II (+) [ —] [ —] -1 1 — 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 6 2 3 9 uR2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I [+] ( + ) 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] 1 1 0 1 — 1 1 1 2 2 10 uR2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I [+] ( + ) 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 2 y3 2 S3 1 2 3 2 3 11 dc2 dR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I ( — ) [ —] 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 3 1 3 12 dR2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I ( — ) [ —] 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 3 1 3 13 dL2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] I ( —) ( + ) 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 1 3 14 dL2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( — ) I ( —) ( + ) I I [ —] ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 1 3 15 uL2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] I [+] [ —] 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 2 3 16 uL2 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( — ) I [+] [ —] 11 [ —] ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 1 6 2 3 17 uc3 uR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I [+] ( + ) 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 2 3 2 3 18 uc3 uR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I [+] ( + ) 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 2 3 2 3 19 d c3 dR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I ( — ) [ —] 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 1 3 1 3 20 d c3 dR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I ( — ) [ —] 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 1 3 1 3 21 dL3 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] I ( —) ( + ) 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 1 6 1 3 22 dL3 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( — ) I ( —) ( + ) I I [ —] [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 1 6 1 3 23 uL3 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] I [+] [ —] 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 1 6 2 3 24 uL3 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( — ) I [+] [ —] 11 [ —] [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 6 1 6 2 3 25 VR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I [+] ( + ) II (+) ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 26 VR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I [+] ( + ) II (+) ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 — 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 — 2 0 0 27 eR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I ( — ) [ —] II (+) ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 2 0 1 — 2 0 0 1 — 2 — 1 — 1 28 e R 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) I ( — ) [ —] II (+) ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 — 2 0 1 — 2 0 0 1 — 2 — 1 — 1 29 e L 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] I ( —) ( + ) II (+) ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 — 1 — 1 30 e L 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( — ) I ( —) ( + ) II ( + ) ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 — 1 — 1 31 VL 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] I [+] [ —] II ( + ) ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 — 1 0 32 VL 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( — ) I [+] [ —] II (+) ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 — 1 0 33 dL4 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] I [+] ( + ) I I [ —] ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 1 3 34 dL4 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( — ) I [+] ( + ) 11 [ —] ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 3 1 3 35 uL1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] I ( —) [ —] 11 [ —] (+) ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 2 3 2 3 36 uL"1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( —) I ( —) [ —] I I [ —] ( + ) ( + ) -1 1 — 2 0 1 — 2 1 — 2 1 2 a/3 1 — 6 2 — 3 2 — 3 37 d c 1 dR 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I [+] [ —] I I [ —] ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 — 2 1 2 -/3 1 — 6 1 — 6 1 3 38 ¿R1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] ( —) I [+] [ —] 11 [ —] (+) ( + ) 1 1 — 2 1 2 0 1 — 2 1 2 -/3 1 — 6 1 — 6 1 3 39 uR1 03 12 56/8 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] I ( — ) ( + ) 11 [ —] ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 6 2 3 Continued on next page 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 225 i |a^l > r (3,1) S 12 t13 t23 t33 t38 t4 Y Q (Anti)octet, r (7,1) = ( — 1) 1 , r (6) = (1) — 1 of (anti)quarks and (anti)leptons 40 r c 1 uR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( — ) 1 ( —) ( + ) ll[ —] ( + ) ( + ) 1 1 — 2 1 — 2 0 1 — 2 1 2 a/3 1 — 6 1 — 6 2 — 3 41 dL2 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] | [+] ( + ) || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 3 1 3 42 dL2 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( —) 1 [+] ( + ) || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 3 1 3 43 uL2 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] | ( —) [ —] || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 2 3 2 3 44 uL2 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( —) 1 ( —) [ —] || (+) [ —] ( + ) -1 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 2 3 2 3 45 dc2 dR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | [+] [ —] || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 6 1 3 46 dc2 dR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] ( —) | [+] [ —] || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 6 1 6 1 3 47 uc 2 uR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | ( —) ( + ) || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) 1 1 2 1 — 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 — 6 1 — 6 2 — 3 48 uc 2 uR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( — ) 1 ( —) ( + ) || ( + ) [ —] ( + ) 1 1 — 2 1 — 2 0 1 2 1 2 S3 1 — 6 1 — 6 2 — 3 49 df3 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] | [+] ( + ) || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 6 1 3 1 3 50 af3 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( —) 1 [+] ( + ) || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 6 1 3 1 3 51 uL3 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] | ( —) [ —] || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 6 2 3 2 3 52 uL3 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( —) 1 ( —) [ —] || (+) (+) [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 S3 1 6 2 3 2 3 53 ac 3 dR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | [+] [ —] || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 6 1 6 1 3 54 ac 3 dR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] ( —) | [+] [ —] || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] 1 1 — 2 1 2 0 0 1 S3 1 — 6 1 — 6 1 3 55 uc 3 uR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | ( —) ( + ) || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] 1 1 2 1 — 2 0 0 1 S3 1 — 6 1 — 6 2 — 3 56 uc 3 uR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( — ) 1 ( —) ( + ) || ( + ) ( + ) [ —] 1 1 — 2 1 — 2 0 0 1 S3 1 — 6 1 — 6 2 — 3 57 eL 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 [ —i] [+] | [+] ( + ) ||[ —] [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 1 58 eL 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) ( —) 1 [+] ( + ) ll[ —] [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 1 59 VL 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] [+] | ( —) [ —] ||[ —] [ —] [ —] -1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 60 VI 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — (+i) ( —) 1 ( —) [ —] ll[ —] [ —] [ —] -1 1 — 2 0 1 — 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 61 VR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | ( —) ( + ) ||[ —] [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 1 — 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 62 VR 03 12 56 78 910 1112 1314 — [ —i] ( —) 1 ( —) ( + ) ll[ —] [ —] [ —] 1 1 — 2 1 — 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 63 eR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 (+i) [+] | [+] [ —] ||[ —] [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 64 eR 03 12 5678 910 1112 1314 [ —i] ( —) 1 [+] [ —] ll[ —] [ —] [ —] 1 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 Table 13.3. The left handed (r f13,1) = —1/Eq.(13.38))multipletofspinors — themembersofthefundamentalrepresentationofthe SO (13, 1 ) group, manifesting the subgroup SO (7, 1 ) of the colour charged quarks and anti-quarks and the colourless leptons and anti-leptons — is presented in the masslessbasisusing the techniquepresentedinApp. 13.5. Itcontains thelefthanded(T (3,1 ) = — 1 )weak(SU (2) j )charged (t13 = ± 2,Eq. (13.23)), and SU (2 ) jj chargeless (t23 = 0, Eq. (13.23)) quarks and leptons and the right handed (T (3,1 ) = 1, Sect. 13.5) weak (SU(2) j) chargeless and SU (2 ) jj charged (t23 = ± 2) quarks and leptons,both with the spin S12 up and down (± 2, respectively). Quarks distinguish from leptons only inthe SU(3) X U( 1 ) part: Quarksaretriplets ofthreeecolours(ci = (t33,t38)= [(1, ), ( — 1 , ), (0,--1= )], Eq. (13.24)) 2 2 V3 2 2 V3 V 3 carrying the "fermioncharge" (t4 = 66,Eq. (13.24)). Thecolourless leptonscarry the "fermioncharge" (t4 = —2). Thesame multipletcontains also theleft handed weak (SU (2 ) j) chargeless and SU(2)jj charged anti-quarks and anti-leptons and the right handed weak (SU (2 ) j) charged and SU(2)jj chargeless anti-quarks and anti-leptons. Anti-quarks distinguish from anti-leptons again only in the SU(3)xU(1 ) part: Anti-quarks are anti-triplets, carrying the "fermion charge" (t4 = —6). The anti-colourless anti-leptons carry the "fermion charge" (t4 = 2). Y = (t23 + t4 ) is the hyper charge, the electromagnetic charge is Q = (t13 + Y). Thestates of opposite charges (anti-particlestates) arereachable from theparticlestates (besidesby Sab ) alsoby the application of the discrete symmetry operator C^/* P, presented in Refs. [41,42] and in Sect. 13.5. The vacuum state, on which the nilpotents and projectors operate, is not shown. The reader can find this Weyl representation also in Refs. [5,14,15,4] and in the references therein. Taking into account Table 13.3 and Eqs. (13.34,13.43) one easily finds what 78 do operators y0 (±) do on the left handed and the right handed members of any 226 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana family i = (1,2,3,4). Y 78 78 K Y° (+) l^UL,vL > = I^UR,VR >, 78 Y0 (+) ^TdR,eR > = l^TdL,eL >, 78 Y0 78 I^VeL > = l^dR,eR > R,eR ?1± (13.11) We need to know also what do operators ('f1± = f11 ± if12, f13) and (IN± = N[ ± iNNL, NL) do when operating on any member (uL,R, vL,R, dL,R, eL,R) of a particular family i = (1,2,3,4). Taking into account, Eqs. (13.32,13.33,13.43,13.45,13.36,13.25,13.26), ab 03 12 L =-(ii)(±) , 1 2 ab 56 78 N N L = 1 (S12 r1± = (T) (±)(T), ab k) (k) = -inaa ab ab ab (k) [k] = i (k), ab 1 + iS 03 ab [k], 1 13 = 2 (S56 ) , T ab ab (k) (k)= 0, ab ab naa (k) = 2 (Ya + V Yb (k) [-k]= 0, ab S78), [k]= 2 (1 + k^^b), (13.12) one finds N + l^1 > = >, N + |V >= 0, N- |V > = l^1 >, NN- l^1 >= 0, NN + |^3 > = >, NN + >= 0, NN- > = |^3 >, NN- |^3 >= 0, f1+ > = |^3 >, f1+ |^3 >= 0, T1->= 0, t1->= 0, f1 + >= 0, t1-|V > = |V >, t1-|^4 > = |V >, f1 + > = |^4 >, NNL > = -1>, NNL >=+1|V >, NNL|V > = -1|^3 >, NN3|V >=+1|^4 >, T13 > = -1 >, 13 2 t13 > = + 2 >, 13 4 >= + 2 |^4 > (13.13) _ nl± _ N , _ 1± _ 13 Let the scalars (/AaA.(.±l.) , AA^)) be the scalar gauge fields of the operators (NN±, NNL, f1±, t13 ), respectively. Here /A = /A7 ^ i A8 for all the scalar gauge 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 227 fields, while A^f3 = ( (ANl1 (±) TiAN1)2),respectively, andaA 1|±) = ( (AA 1 )TiA(±) respectively. All these fields can be expressed by dabc, as presented in Eq. (13.30). We are prepared now to calculate the mass matrix elements for any of the 78 family members. Let us notice that the operators y0 (t), as well as the operators of spin and charges, distinguish between > and >. Correspondingly all the diagrams must have an odd number of contribution. We use the massless basis >. We shall simplify the calculation by making a choice of the _2 (I^l > >), keeping in mind that we must have an odd number of contributions We can calculate the mass matrix for any family member using Eqs. (13.13). Below we present the mass matrix on the tree level, where (a. 1, a2, aa) represent the 1 3 (+) A(*_)), respectively and where to A^ the sum of T4aA4 Eq. (13.10), is contributing. vacuum expectation values of ( __= (A(+) +A(3)), 2 (A N+3 +A N_l3), _Tf (AJ"+) + l(±), T13aA(3) and x23aAf^), We use the notation < A Nl± >- _l (< anl± >= _2 (< a( + ) > + < A, • Nl± >) and < A' >= _2 « A(±) > + < A( >), since we use the basis _2 (|^L > >). On the tree level is the contribution to the matrix elements < |..|^4 >, < ^2|..|^3 >, < ^3|..|^2 > and <^4|..|^( > equal to zero. One can come, however, from < V |..|^4 > in three steps (not two, due to the left right jumps in each step): < ^4I t'3 AT@ Lk >< N±ANl@ |^4 > < ^4| (ai + a2 + aa) |^4 >, there are all together six such terms, since the diagonal term appears also at the beginning as (—a( — a2 + aa) and in the middle as (aT — a2 + aa), and since the operators Y. + _ TT@ AT@ and Y. + _ N±ANl@ appear in the opposite order as well. Summing all this six terms for each of four matrix elements (< 11..|4 >, < 2|..|3 >, < 3|..|2 >, < 4|..|1 >) we find: < 11..|4 > = 6aa < A'u >< AnlU >, < 2|..|3 > = 6aa < ATB > < Anl® > , < 3|..|2 > = 6aa < ATffl > < AnlB > , < 4|..|1 > = 6aa < ATffl > < Anl® > . (13.14) These matrix elements are presented in Eq. (13.15). "Mo) = — a! — a2+aa ,6a» — a,+a2 + aa 6aa 6aab 6aa ai +a2+a" (13.15) > One notices that the diagonal terms have on the tree level the symmetry < Vl-lV > + < ^4|..|^4 >= aa = < Vl-lV > + < ^3|..lV > and that in 228 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana the off diagonal elements in next order to zero the contribution of the fields, which depend on particular family member a = (u, d, v, e) enter. We also notice that < >f=< |..|^ >. In the case that < A1B >=< A1B >= e and < AnlB >=< Anl® >= d, which would mean that all the matrix elements are real, the mass matrix simplifies to 6aaed \ e d . \ 6aaed e d a1 + a2 + aa) (13.16) 13.2.1 Mass matrices beyond the tree level To make a proof that the symmetry SU(2)x SU(2) x U(1) of the mass matrix, presented in Eq. (13.15), is kept in all orders of loop corrections, we need to proof only that at each order the matrix element, let say, < 11__12 > (in Eq. (13.15) this matrix element is equal to < AnlB >) remains equal to < 3|..|4 > in all orders, while < 2|..|1 > remains to be equal to < 11..|2 >t=< 4|..|3 > (=< AnlB >). These should be done for all the matrix elements appearing in Eq. (13.15. a. It is not difficult to see that each of the diagonal terms (t13 < A13 >, N3 < Anl3 >, ta < Aa >, with ta = t4,t13,t23) have the property that the sum of the contributions x + xxx + xxxxx + ... (in all orders) keeps the symmetry of the tree level. Let us check for t 13 < A13 >. One obtains for each of the four families i = [1,2,3,4] the values [-a1 (1 + (-a1 )2 + (-a1 )4 + ...), -a1 (1 +(-a1 )2 + (-a1)4 +...), a1 (1 +(a1)2 + (a1)4 +... ),a1(1 +(a1)2 + (a1)4 +...)], which we call [-a1, -a1, a1, a1] for the four families i = [1,2,3,4], respectively. Correspondingly one finds for the same kind of diagrams for N3 < Anl3 > the four values [-a2, a2, -a2, a2] for the four families i = [1,2,3,4], respectively. While for ta Aa we obtain, when summing over the diagrams x + xxx + xxxxx +..., the same value aa for a particular family member a = (u, d, v, e) all four families. Family members properties enter in the left/right basis (|^3 > > into the mass matrix only through aa. One reproduces that the sum of < 11..|1 > + < 4|..|4 >=< 2|..|2 > + < 3|..|3 > Correspondingly it is not difficult to see that all the matrix elements, not only diagonal but also off diagonal, keep the symmetry of the mass matrix of Eq. (13.15) in all orders of corrections, provided that the matrix elements of the kind aa1 + (a2 + aa — or of the kind in the aa1 + (a2 + aa — appears in the diagrams in first power only. Here (a, (3) are ±1, they are determined by the eigenvalues of the operators t13 (for a1) and N3 (for a2), respectively, on a particular family, Eq. (13.13). Mo) /-ai - a2 + a0 e d -ai + a2 + a0 6aaed a1 6aaed a2 + a0 e d 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 229 b. Let us add to the diagonal terms the loop corrections. Let us evaluate, using the massless basis >= ^ > >), the contribution: I Y Y0 (±) [N±ANl@ + TËA1 @]|V > — ,+,B,B,j ,_ 78 . _ _ < Y0 (±) [NNLANl3 + T13/13 + TaAa> —,+ a . (13.17) — ,+,B,B One finds for i =[1,2,3,4] the values [A1 B A1 B (a1 - a2 + aa) +ANlB ANlB (-a1 + 12+aa), A 1 BA 1 B(a1 +a2+aa) +ANlbAnLB(-a1 -a2+aa), A 1BA 1 B-a1 -a2+ aa) +A111 lbAnLB(+a1 + a2 + aa), A 1BA 1 B(-a1 + a2 + aa) +ANlbAnLffl(+a1 -a2 + aa)], respectively, which again has the symmetry of the tree level state < 11... |1 > + < 4|... |4 >=< 2|... |2 > + < 3|... |3 >. One can make three such loops, or any kind of loops in any order of loop corrections with one (aa1 + pa2 + aa) and the symmetry of tree level state < 11... |1 > + < 4|... |4 >=< 2|... |2 > + < 3|... |3 > is manifested. c. Let us look at the loop corrections to the off diagonal terms < 11... |2 >, < 11... 13 >, < 21... |4 >, < 3|... |4 >, as well as their complex conjugate values. Let us evaluate, using the massless basis >= ^ O^l > >), the contribution: < X Y0 (7±8) INN±ANL±+Sa 1 S]|V > —,+,B,B,j,k —,+ <^k| Y Y0 (±) [NTLAANlS + t^A1 B]|V > —,+,B,B 78 + <^4| Y Y0 (±) [TT LAA^1 l3 + t13/13 +y_ TaAa]|^4 > — ,+,B,B,j A —,+,B,B 78 . (13.18) — ,+,B,B A One obtains for this term < 4|...|2 >= < /A1 B > {/A1,1 lB/aNlB + |/ANL3|2 + |/A 13|2 + |taAa|2}, which is equal to the equivalent loop correction term for the matrix element < 3|...|1 >. Checking the loop corrections for the off diagonal elements < 11... |2 > , < 11... |3 >, < 2|... |4 >, < 3|... |4 > in all loop corrections one finds that the symmetry of these off diagonal terms is kept in all orders. 230 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana d. There are still the terms < 11... |4 >, < 2|... |3 >, < 3|... |2 > and < 4|... |1 > to be checked in loop corrections. Adding loop corrections in the way we did in c. we find that also these matrix elements keep the symmetry of Eq. (13.15). 13.3 Conclusions We demonstrate in this contribution on several cases that the matrix elements of mass matrices 4 x 4, predicted by the spin-charge-family theory for each family member a = (u, d,v,e) to have the symmetry sU(2)sq(4]1+3 x SU(2)s-O(4).weak. x U(1) on the tree level, keeps this symmetry in all loop corrections. The first to groups concern the family groups, the last one concern the family members group. The only dependence of the mass matrix on the family member (a = (u, d, v, e)) quantum numbers is on the tree level through the vacuum expectation values 78 78 , 78 of the operators y0 (±) QAQ, y0 (±) Q 'AQ and y0 (±) t4A±, appearing on a tree level in the diagonal terms of the mass matrix only and are the same for each of four families — I4x4aa, I is the unite matrix. In the loop corrections these operators enter into all the off diagonal matrix elements, causing the difference in the masses of the family members. The right handed neutrino, which is the regular member of the four families, Table 13.3, has the nonzero value of the operator t4 A4 only (while the family part of the mass matrix is on the tree level the same for all the members). We demonstrate on several cases, why does the symmetry of the mass matrix, which shows up on the tree level, remain in the loop corrections in all orders. Although we are not (yet) able to calculate these matrix elements, the predicted symmetry will enable to predict masses of the fourth family (to the observed three), since the 3 x 3 submatrix of the 4 x 4 matrix determines 4 x 4 matrix uniquely [19,4]. We only must wait for accurate enough data for mixing matrices of quarks and leptons to predict, using the symmetry of mass matrices predicted by the spin-charge-family, the masses of the fourth family quarks and leptons. 13.4 APPENDIX: Short presentation of the spin-charge-family theory This subsection follows similar sections in Refs. [1,4-7]. The spin-charge-family theory [1-11,14-22] assumes: A. A simple action (Eq. (13.20)) in an even dimensional space (d = 2n, d > 5), d is chosen to be (13 + 1). This choice makes that the action manifests in d = (3 + 1) in the low energy regime all the observed degrees of freedom, explaining all the assumptions of the standard model, as well as other observed phenomena. There are two kinds of the Clifford algebra objects, Ya's and Ya's in this theory with the properties. {Ya,Yb}+ = 2nab, {Ya,Yb}+ = 2nab, , {Ya,Yb}+ = 0. (13.19) 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 231 Fermions interact with the vielbeins faa and the two kinds of the spin-connection fields- daba and d aba - the gauge fields of Sab = 4 (ya Yb — yb Ya) and ¡5ab = 4 (Ya Yb — Yb Ya), respectively. The action A = 1 ddx E 2 (if YaPoaf) + h.c. + ddx E (aR + a R), (13.20) in which poa = faa P0a + 2E (P«, Efaa}-, P0a = Pa - ^ Sab ^aba - 2 Sab & aba, and R = 1 {fa[afPb] (&aba,P - &caa &%)} + h.C., R = 1 {fa[afPb] (ddaba,p — dcaa dcbp)} + h.C. 4, introduces two kinds of the Clifford algebra objects, Ya and Ya, {Ya, Yb}+ = 2nab = {"5a, Yb}+. faa are vielbeins inverted to eaa, Latin letters (a, b,..) denote flat indices, Greek letters (a, |3,..) are Einstein indices, (m, n,..) and v,..) denote the corresponding indices in (0,1,2,3), while (s, t,..) and (ct, t, ..) denote the corresponding indices in d > 5: eaafpa = , eaafab = §b , (13.21) E = det(eaa). B. The spin-charge-family theory assumes in addition that the manifold M(13+1' breaks first into M(7+1) x M(6) (which manifests as SO(7,1) xSU(3) xU(1)), affecting both internal degrees of freedom - the one represented by Ya and the one represented by Ya. Since the left handed (with respect to M(7+1') spinors couple differently to scalar (with respect to M(7+1') fields than the right handed ones, the break can leave massless and mass protected 2((7+1 )/2-1) families [34]. The rest of families get heavy masses 5. C. There is additional breaking of symmetry: The manifold M(7+1) breaks further into M(3+1)x M(4). D. There is a scalar condensate (Table 13.5) of two right handed neutrinos with the family quantum numbers of the upper four families, bringing masses of the scale abs, Am1 = Ya b cAiab dabs and three singlets, the gauge fields of Q, Q', S', Eqs. (13.28), all with the weak and the hyper charges as assumed by the standard model for the Higgs's scalars, oo.iii. of the scalar fields explaining the origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry, Ref. [5], oo.iv. of the appearance of the dark matter, there are two decoupled groups of four families, carrying family charges (NL, T1) and (NR, T2), Eqs. (13.25,13.26), both groups carry also the family members charges (Q, Q', Y'), Eq. (13.28). The standard model groups of spins and charges are the subgroups of the SO (13,1) group with the generator of the infinitesimal transformations expressible with sab (= 2(YaYb - YbYa), {sab,scd}_ = -i(nadsbc + nbcsad - nacsbd -nbdsac)) for the spin N±(= N(L , R)):= 1 (S23 ± iS01,S31 ± iS02,S12 ± iS03), (13.22) 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 233 for the weak charge, SU(2)i, and the second SU(2)n, these two groups are the invariant subgroups of SO (4), t1 : = 1 (S58 - S67, S57 + S68, S56 - S78), t2 : = 1 (S58 + S67, S57 - S68, S56 + S78), (13.23) for the colour charge SU(3) and for the "fermion charge" U(1 )II, these two groups are subgroups of SO(6), t3 := 1 {S912 - S1011 ,S911 + S1012, S910 - S11 12, S9 14 - S10 13 s9 13 + s10 14 S11 14 - S12 13 S1113 + S1214, —(S910 + S11 12 - 2S1314)}, V3 t4 := -1 (S910 + S11 12 + S1314), (13.24) t4 is the "fermion charge", while the hyper charge Y = t23 + t4. The generators of the family quantum numbers are the superposition of the generators Sab (Sab = 4 {ya,Yb}-, {Sab,Scd}_ = -i(nadSbc + nbcSad -nacSbd - nbdSac), {Sab, Scd}_ = 0. One correspondingly finds the generators of the subgroups of SO(7,1), NL,R : = 1 (S23 ± iS01, S31 ± iS02, S12 ± iS03), (13.25) which determine representations of the two SU(2) invariant subgroups of SO (3,1), while T1 : = 1 (S58 - S67, S57 + S68, S56 - S78), T2 : = 2(S58 + S67, S57 - S68, S56 + S78), (13.26) determine representations of SU(2)Ix SU(2)II of SO(4). Both, SO(3,1) and SO(4), are the subgroups of SO(7,1). One finds for the infinitesimal generator T4 of U(1) originating in SO(6) the expression T4 := -3(S910 + S11 12 + S1314). (13.27) The operators for the charges Y and Q of the standard model, together with Q' and Y', and the corresponding operators of the family charges Y, Y', Q, Q' are defined as follows: Y := t4 + t23 , Y' := -t4 tan2-S2 + t23 , Q := t13 + Y, Q' :=-Ytan2+ t13 , Y := T4 + T23 , Y' :=-T4 tan2 32 + T23 , Q := Y + T13 , Q' =-Ytan2 + T13 . (13.28) 234 N.S. Mankoc Borstnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana The families split into two groups of four families, each manifesting the SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1), with the generators of of the infinitesimal transformations (NL, f1, Q, Q', Y') and (Nr, f2, Q, Q', Y'), respectively. The generators of U(1 ) group (Q, Q', Y'), Eq. 13.28, distinguish among family members and are the same for both groups of four families, presented on Table 13.4, taken from Ref. [4]. The vector gauge fields of the charges f1, f2, f3 and t4 follow from the requirement Y.A1 f^A^i = Hs t 2 Sst ^stm and the requirement that tai = La b cA1ab Sab, Eq. (13.2), fulfilling the commutation relations {fA1,TBj}_ = i5AfefA1jkTAk, Eq. (13.3). Correspondingly we find A^l = Ls,t cA1st ^stm, Eq. (13.4), with (s, t) either in (5,6,7,8) or in (9,..., 14). , The explicit expressions for these vector gauge fields in terms of ^stm are as follows 1 A m = (^58m — ^67m, ^57m + ^68m, ^56m — ^78m) , 2m Am = (i58m + ^67-— d57m — i68m, d56m + d78mJ , AS = i56m — (i9 10m + ^11 12m + ^13 14m) , A— = (i56m + i78m) — (^9 10m + ^11 12m + ^13 14m) , A — = (^9 12m — i10 11m, i9 11m + ^10 12m, ^9 10m — i11 12m, d9 14m — d10 d9 13m + d10 14m, d11 14m — d12 ^11 13m + ^12 14m, ^3 (^9 10m + i11 12m — 2i13 14m)) , A— = (i9 10m + ^11 12m + i1314m) . (13.29) All istm vector gauge fields are real fields. Here the fields contain the coupling constants which are not necessarily the same for all of them. In the case that the coupling constants would be the same, than the angles 02 and 02 would be equal to one, which is not the case (at least sinf « 0.22.) One obtains in a similar way the scalar gauge fields, which determine mass matrices of family members. They carry the space index s = (7,8). A1 = (id58s — id67s, id57s + i68s, i56s — id78s) , A2 = (id58s + id67s,id57s — i68s, i56s + id78s) , A^s = (id23s + iid01s, id31s + iid02s, id 12s + &03s) , A^s = (id23s — iid01s, id31s — iid02s, id 12s — iid03s) , AQ = id56s — (i9 10s + i11 12s + id13 14s) , Aj = (i56s + id78s) — (i9 10s + i11 12s + i13 14s) A4 = —(i910s + i11 12s + id13 14s) . (13.30) All ists', idsts', (s,t,s') = (5, •, 14), idi,j,s' and iid0,s', (i,j) = (1,2,3) scalar gauge fields are real fields. t13 f23 N3 Nr t Ul1! 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 I (+i) [+] W ( + ) II (+) [- -] h] vr1 (+i) [+] W (+) (+) (+) (+) 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 I [+i] (+) W ( + ) II (+) [- -] h] VR2 [+i] (+) W (+) (+) (+) (+) 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 I (+i) [+] (+) W II (+) [- -] h] (+i) [+] (+) W (+) (+) (+) 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 ur4 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 I [+i] (+) (+) W II (+) [- -] h] [+i] (+) (+) W (+) (+) (+) 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Ur5 03 12 56 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 II [+i] [+] [+] W II (+) h -] H [+i] [+] [+] [+] (+) ( + ) (+) 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 U& 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 II (+i) (+) 1 [+] [+] II (+) [- -] h] (+i) (+) 1 [+] [+] (+) (+) (+) 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 UCrV 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 1112 13 14 II [+i] [+] 1 (+) ( + ) II (+) [- -] h] vr7 [+i] [+] 1 (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 03 12 56 78 9 10 1 12 13 14 03 12 56 78 9 10 11 12 13 14 II (+i) (+) 1 (+) (+) II (+) [ -] h] ■vr8 (+i) (+) 1 (+) (+) II (+) (+) (+) 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 Table 13.4. Eight families of the right handed Ur1 (13.3) quark with spin the colour charge (t33 =1/2, T38 = 1 /(2-\/3) (the definition of the operators is presented in Eqs. (13.23,13.24), a few examples how to calculate the application of these operators on the states can be found in Subsect. 13.5. The definition of the operators, expressible with Sab is: = j(S23 ± iS01, S31 ± IS02, S12 ± IS03), ? = 1(S58 - S67, S57 + S68, S56 - S78), t2 = 1(S58+S67,S57-S68,S56+S78) andt4 = -1(S9 10 + S11'12 +S13 14)),and of the colourless right handed neutrino vR of spin \ are presented in the left and in the right column, respectively. They belong to two groups of four families, one (II) is a doublet with respect to (N l and f1) and a singlet with respect to (NR and t2), the other (I) is a singlet with respect to (Nl and t1) and a doublet with with respect to (NR and t2). All the families follow from the starting one by the application of the operators (N^ L, f1-2'1 Eq. (13.45). The generators (N^ L, t'2,1 (Eq. (13.45)) transform uRi) 1 = (1, • • • , 8), to all the members of the same colour of thefamily. The same generators transform equivalently the right handed neutrino VRi,i = (!,••• , 8), to all the colourless members of the itH family. 236 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana The theory predicts, due to commutation relations of generators of the infinitesimal transformations of the family groups, SU(2)i xSU(2)i and SU(2)n xSU(2)n, the first one with the generators NL and T1, and the second one with the generators NR and T2, Eqs. (13.25,13.26), two groups of four families. The theory offers (so far) several predictions: i. several new scalars, those coupled to the lower group of four families — two triplets and three singlets, the superposition of (A], AjN and AQ,Aj, a4, Eq. (13.30) — some of them to be observed at the LHC ([1,5,4], ii. the fourth family to the observed three to be observed at the LHC ([1,5,4] and the references therein), iii. new nuclear force among nucleons built from the quarks of the upper four families. The theory offers also the explanation for several phenomena, like it is the "miraculous" cancellation of thestandard model triangle anomalies [3]. The breaks of the symmetries, manifesting in Eqs. (13.22,13.25,13.23,13.26, 13.24, 13.27), are in the spin-charge-family theory caused by the scalar condensate of the two right handed neutrinos belonging to one group of four families, Table 13.5, and by the nonzero vacuum expectation values of the scalar fields carrying the space index (7,8) (Refs. [4,1] and the references therein). The space breaks first to SO(7,1) xSU(3) x U(1)II and then further to SO(3,1) x SU(2)I xU(1)I xSU(3) x U(1 )II, what explains the connections between the weak and the hyper charges and the handedness of spinors [3]. state S S12 T13 T23 T4 Y Q T13 T23 T4 Y Q NL NR (ivt >1 vr >2) 0 0 0 1 —1 0 0 0 1 —1 0 0 0 1 (VT >1 |e2T >2) (lelT >1 |e2R" >2) 0 0 0 0 —1 —1 —1 0 0 0 —1 —1 —2 —2 0 1 —1 0 0 0 1 0 1 —1 0 0 0 1 Table 13.5. This table is taken from [5]. The condensate of the two right handed neutrinos vR, with the VUIth family quantum numbers, coupled to spin zero and belonging to a triplet with respect to the generators T2i, is presented together with its two partners. The right handed neutrino has Q = 0 = Y. The triplet carries T4 = — 1, T23 = 1, T4 = —1, NR = 1, NL = 0, Y = 0, Q = 0. The T31 = 0. The family quantum numbers are presented in Table 13.4. The stable of the upper four families is the candidate for the dark matter, the fourth of the lower four families is predicted to be measured at the LHC. 13.5 APPENDIX: Short presentation of spinor technique [1,4,10,12,13] This appendix is a short review (taken from [4]) of the technique [10,40,12,13], initiated and developed in Ref. [10] by one of the authors (N.S.M.B.), while proposing the spin-charge-family theory [2,4,5,7,8,1,14,15,9-11,16-22]. All the internal degrees 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 237 of freedom of spinors, with family quantum numbers included, are describable with two kinds of the Clifford algebra objects, besides with Ya's, used in this theory to describe spins and all the charges of fermions, also with Ya's, used in this theory to describe families of spinors: {Ya,Yb}+ = 2nab , {Ya,Yb}+ = 2nab , {Ya,Yb}+ = 0. (13.31) We assume the "Hermiticity" property for Ya's (and Ya's) Ya^ = naaYa (and Y= naaYa), in order that Ya (and Ya) are compatible with (13.31) and formally unitary, i.e. Ya ^ Ya = I (and Ya ^Ya = I). One correspondingly finds that (Sab)^ = naanbbSab (and (Sab)+ = naanbbSab). Spinor states are represented as products of nilpotents and projectors, formed as odd and even objects of Ya's, respectively, chosen to be the eigenstates of a Cartan subalgebra of the Lorentz groups defined by Ya's ab 1 naa ab 1 i (k): = 2 (Ya + n^Yb), [k]:= ^(1 + ^yV), (13.32) where k2 = naanbb. We further have [4] ab 1 naa ab Ya (k):= 1 (YaYa + VYaYb)= naa [-k], 2 ik ab 1 i ab Ya [k]:= 1 (Ya + rYaYaYb) =(-k), 2k ab 1 n aa ab Ya (k): = -W (Ya + VYb)Ya = -inaa [k], 2 ik ab 1 i ab Ya [k]: = i2 (1 + kYaYb)Ya = -i(k), (13.33) where we assume that all the operators apply on the vacuum state |^0). We define ab ^ ab ab ^ ab a vacuum state |^0 > so that one finds < (k) (k) >= 1 , < [k] [k] >= 1. ab ab ab We recognize that Ya transform (k) into [-k], never to [k], while Ya transform ab ab ab (k) into [k], never to [-k] ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab Ya (k)= naa [-k], Yb (k)= -ik [-k], Ya [k]=(-k), Yb [k]= -iknaa (-k), ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab Y~a (k) = -inaa [k], Y~b (k)= -k [k], Y~a [k]= i (k), Y~b [k]= -knaa (k) . (13.34) The Clifford algebra objects Sab and Sab close the algebra of the Lorentz group Sab : = (i/4)(YaYb - YbYa), Sab : = (i/4)(YaYb - YbYa), (13.35) {Sab, S cd}- = 0, {Sab,Scd}- = i(nadSbc +nbcSad-nac Sbd -nbdSac), {S ab,S cd}-= i(nadSbc + nbcSad - nacSbd - nbdSac). 238 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana ab ab One can easily check that the nilpotent (k) and the projector [k] are "eigen-states" of Sab and Sab ab 1 ab ab 1 ab Sab (k)= ^k (k), Sab [k]= -k [k], ab 1 ab ab 1 ab Sab (k)= 2 k (k), Sab [k]=-2 k [k], (13.36) where the vacuum state |"^0) is meant to stay on the right hand sides of projectors ab and nilpotents. This means that multiplication of nilpotents (k) and projectors ab [k] by Sab get the same objects back multiplied by the constant 1 k, while Sab ab ab multiply (k) by | and [k] by (—|) (rather than by |). This also means that when ab ab (k) and [k] act from the left hand side on a vacuum state |^0) the obtained states are the eigenvectors of Sab. The technique can be used to construct a spinor basis for any dimension d and any signature in an easy and transparent way. Equipped with nilpotents and projectors of Eq. (13.32), the technique offers an elegant way to see all the quantum numbers of states with respect to the two Lorentz groups, as well as transformation properties of the states under the application of any Clifford algebra object. Recognizing from Eq.(13.35) that the two Clifford algebra objects (Sab, Scd) with all indexes different commute (and equivalently for (Sab,Scd)), we select the Cartan subalgebra of the algebra of the two groups, which form equivalent representations with respect to one another S03,S12,S56, ••• ,Sd_1d, if d = 2n > 4, S 03,S 12,S56, ••• ,Sd-1 d, if d = 2n > 4. (13.37) The choice of the Cartan subalgebra in d < 4 is straightforward. It is useful to define one of the Casimirs of the Lorentz group — the handedness r ({F, Sab}_ = 0) (as well as f) in any d = 2n r(d) :=(i)d/2 n (VnaaYa), if d = 2n, a f(d) :=(i)(d_1)/2 n (Vnaa^a), if d = 2n. (13.38) a We understand the product of Ya's in the ascending order with respect to the index a: y0y1 • • • Yd. It follows from the Hermiticity properties of Ya for any choice of the signature naa that r^ = r, r2 = I.( Equivalent relations are valid for f.) We also find that for d even the handedness anticommutes with the Clifford algebra objects Ya ({Ya, r}+ = 0) (while for d odd it commutes with Ya ({Ya, r}_ = 0)). Taking into account the above equations it is easy to find a Weyl spinor irreducible representation for d-dimensional space, with d even or odd 6. For d even we simply make a starting state as a product of d/2, let us say, only ' For d odd the basic states are products of (d — 1 )/2 nilpotents and a factor (1 ± F). 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 239 ab nilpotents (k), one for each Sab of the Cartan subalgebra elements (Eqs.(13.37, 13.35)), applying it on an (unimportant) vacuum state. Then the generators Sab, which do not belong to the Cartan subalgebra, being applied on the starting state from the left hand side, generate all the members of one Weyl spinor. 0d 12 35 d-1 d-2 (kod)(k12)(k35) ••• (kd-1 d-2) |^o > 0d 12 35 d-1 d-2 [-kod][-k12](k35) ••• (kd-1 d-2) |^o > 0d 12 35 d-1 d-2 [-kod](k12)[-k35] ••• (kd-1 d-2) |^o > 0d 12 35 d-1 d-2 [-kod](k12)(k35) ••• [-kd-1 d-2] |^o > od 12 35 d-1 d-2 (kod)[-k12][-k35] ••• (kd-1 d-2) |^o > . (13.39) All the states have the same handedness r, since {r, Sab}- = 0. States, belonging to one multiplet with respect to the group SO(q, d — q), that is to one irreducible representation of spinors (one Weyl spinor), can have any phase. We could make a choice of the simplest one, taking all phases equal to one. (In order to have the usual transformation properties for spinors under the rotation of spin and under Cn Pn,some of the states must be multiplied by (—1).) The above representation demonstrates that for d even all the states of one irreducible Weyl representation of a definite handedness follow from a starting ab state, which is, for example, a product of nilpotents (kab), by transforming all ab mn ab mn possible pairs of (kab)(kmn) into [-kab][-kmJ. There are Sam,San,Sbm,Sbn, which do this. The procedure gives 2(d/2-1' states. A Clifford algebra object Ya being applied from the left hand side, transforms a Weyl spinor of one handedness into a Weyl spinor of the opposite handedness. We shall speak about left handedness when r = — 1 and about right handedness when r = 1. While Sab, which do not belong to the Cartan subalgebra (Eq. (13.37)), generate all the states of one representation, S ab, which do not belong to the Cartan subalgebra (Eq. (13.37)), generate the states of 2d/2-1 equivalent representations. Making a choice of the Cartan subalgebra set (Eq. (13.37)) of the algebra Sab and Sab: (S03, S12, S56, S78, S9 10, S11 12, S13 14 ), (S03, S12, S56, S78, S9 10, S11 12, S1314 ), a left handed (r(13,1) = —1) eigenstate of all the members of the Cartan subalgebra, representing a weak chargeless uR-quark with spin up, hyper charge (2/3) and colour (1/2, 1/(2%/3)), for example, can be written as 03 12 56 78 9 1011 1213 14 (+i)(+) | ( + )(+) || ( + )(-) (-) |^0> = 1(Y0 - y3)(y1 + iY2)|(Y5 + iY6)(Y7 + iY8)|| (Y9 + iY10)(Y11 - iY12)(Y13 - iY14)|^o>. (13.40) 240 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana This state is an eigenstate of all Sab and Sab which are members of the Cartan subalgebra (Eq. (13.37)). The operators Sab, which do not belong to the Cartan subalgebra (Eq. (13.37)), generate families from the starting uR quark, transforming the uR quark from Eq. (13.40) to the uR of another family, keeping all of the properties with respect to Sab unchanged. In particular, S01 applied on a right handed uR-quark from Eq. (13.40) generates a state which is again a right handed uR-quark, weak charge-less, with spin up, hyper charge (2/3) and the colour charge (1/2,1/(2%/3)) 5 01 03 12 56 78 91011121314 03 12 56 78 91011121314 (+i)(+) I (+)(+) II (+) (-) (-) = -o [+i][ + ] I (+)(+) II (+) (-) (- 2 (13.41) One can find both states in Table 13.4, the first uR as uR8 in the eighth line of this table, the second one as uR7 in the seventh line of this table. Below some useful relations follow. From Eq.(13.34) one has ab cd i ab cd ab cd i abcd Sac (k)(k) = -2-naancc [—k][—k], Sac (k)(k)= ^naancc MM, ab cd ab cd Sac [k][k] = - (-k)(-k), 2 ab cd ab cd ab cd i ab cd >ac [k][k]=-2 (k)(k), ab cd ab cd Sac (k) [k] = -- naa [-k](-k), 2 (k)[k]=--naa [k](k), 2 ab cd Sac [k](k) = 2ncc ab cd -k) [-k], ab cd ab cd [k](k)= 2ncc (k) [k] . (13.42) We conclude from the above equation that Sab generate the equivalent representations with respect to Sab and opposite. We recognize in Eq. (13.43) the demonstration of the nilpotent and the projec- ab ab tor character of the Clifford algebra objects (k) and [k], respectively. ab ab (k)(k) = 0, ab ab ab (k)(-k)= naa [k], ab ab (-k)(k) = ab ab [k] [k] ab = [k], ab ab [k][-k]= 0, ab ab [-k][k]= ab ab (k) [k] = 0, ab ab ab [k](k)=(k), ab ab (-k)[k] = ab ab (k) [-k] ab = (k), ab ab [k](-k) = 0, ab ab [-k](k)= Defining ab i (±i)= 2 (Ya T Yb), ab 1 (±1)= 2 ab i [±i]= 2 (1 ± YaYb), ab 1 [±1]= ab ab ab naa [-k], (-k)(-k)= 0, ab ab ab 0, [-k][-k]=[-k], ab ab ab -k), (-k) [-k] = 0, ab ab ab 0, [-k](-k)=(-k) . (13.43) ab c c b 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 241 one recognizes that ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab ab (k) (k) = 0, (-k) (k) = -inaa [k], (k) [k] = i (k), (k) [-k]= 0. (13.44) Below some more useful relations [14] are presented: 03 12 03 12 N± = N+ ± iN+ = - (Ti)(±), N± = N- ± iN- = (±i)(±), 03 12 03 12 :i± _ i-^-vi^ Ki± N+ =-(Ti)(±), N± =(±i)(±), 56 78 56 78 T1± = (T)(±)(T) , T2^ = (T)(=F)(=F) , 56 78 56 78 T1± = (F) (±)(F), T2^ = (F) (F)(F) . (13.45) In Table 13.4 [4] the eight families of the first member in Table 13.3 (member number 1) of the eight-plet of quarks and the 25th member in Table 13.3 of the eight-plet of leptons are presented as an example. The eight families of the right handed u1R quark are presented in the left column of Table 13.4 [4]. In the right column of the same table the equivalent eight-plet of the right handed neutrinos v1R are presented. All the other members of any of the eight families of quarks or leptons follow from any member of a particular family by the application of the operators N± L and t'2'1 Eq. (13.45) on this particular member. The eight-plets separate into two group of four families: One group contains doublets with respect to N R and T2, these families are singlets with respect to N L and T1. Another group of families contains doublets with respect to N L and T1, these families are singlets with respect to N R and T2. The scalar fields which are the gauge scalars of NR and T2 couple only to the four families which are doublets with respect to these two groups. The scalar fields which are the gauge scalars of N L and T1 couple only to the four families which are doublets with respect to these last two groups. After the electroweak phase transition, caused by the scalar fields with the space index (7,8), the two groups of four families become massive. The lowest of the two groups of four families contains the observed three, while the fourth remains to be measured. The lowest of the upper four families is the candidate for the dark matter [1]. References 1. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "Spin-charge-family theory is offering next step in understanding elementary particles and fields and correspondingly universe", Proceedings to the Conference on Cosmology, Gravitational Waves and Particles, IARD conferences, Ljubljana, 6-9 June 2016, The 10th Biennial Conference on Classical and Quantum Relativistic Dynamics of articles and Fields, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 845 (2017) 012017 2. D. Lukman, N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 231. 242 N.S. Mankoc Borštnik and A. Hernandez-Galeana 3. N.S. Mankoc Borštnik, H.B.F. Nielsen, Fortschrite der Physik, Progress of Physics (2017) 1700046. 4. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, J. of Mod. Phys. 6 (2015) 2244-2274. 5. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 6, 065004 ID: 0703013. doi:10.1103; [arxiv:1409.7791,arXiv:1502.06786v1]. 6. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, J. of Modern Phys. 4, 823-847 (2013) [arxiv:1312.1542]. 7. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "Spin-charge-family theory is explaining appearance of families of quarks and leptons, of Higgs and Yukawa couplings", in Proceedings to the 16th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 14-21 of July, 2013, eds. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen and D. Lukman (DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana, December 2013) p.113 -142, [arxiv:1312.1542]. 8. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "Do we have the explanation for the Higgs and Yukawa couplings of the standard model", http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.3184v2, (http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6233), in Proceedings to the 15 th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 9-19 of July, 2012, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik,H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana, December 2012, p.56-71, [arxiv.1302.4305]. 9. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Phys. Lett. B 292, 25-29 (1992). 10. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, J. Math. Phys. 34, 3731-3745 (1993). 11. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 40, 315-338 (2001). 12. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B.F. Nielsen, J. of Math. Phys. 43,5782 (2002) [hep-th/0111257]. 13. N.S. Mankoc Borštnik, H.B.F. Nielsen, J. of Math. Phys. 44 4817 (2003) [hep-th/0303224]. 14. A. Borstnik Bracic and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Phys. Rev. D 74, 073013 (2006) [hep-ph/0301029; hep-ph/9905357, p. 52-57; hep-ph/0512062, p.17-31; hep-ph/0401043 ,p. 31-57]. 15. A. Borstnik Bracic, N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "The approach Unifying Spins and Charges and Its Predictions", Proceedings to the Euroconference on Symmetries Beyond the Standard Model, PortoroZ, July 12-17,2003, Ed. by N.S. Mankoc Borštnik, H.B. Nielsen, C. Froggatt, D. Lukman, DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana December 2003, p. 31-57, [hep-ph/0401043, hep-ph/0401055. 16. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Modern Phys. Lett. A 10, 587 -595 (1995). 17. G. Bregar, M. Breskvar, D. Lukman and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, New J. of Phys. 10, 093002 (2008), [arXiv:0606159, arXiv:07082846, arXiv:0612250, p.25-50]. 18. G. Bregar and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083534 (2009) 1-16. 19. G. Bregar, N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "Can we predict the fourth family masses for quarks and leptons?", Proceedings to the 16 th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 14-21 of July, 2013, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana December 2013, p. 31-51, [arxiv:1403.4441]. 20. G. Bregar, N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "The new experimental data for the quarks mixing matrix are in better agreement with the spin-charge-family theory predictions", Proceedings to the 17th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 20-28 of July, 2014, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana December 2014, p.20-45 [ arXiv:1502.06786v1] [arxiv:1412.5866] 21. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "Do we have the explanation for the Higgs and Yukawa couplings of the standard model", [arxiv:1212.3184, arxiv:1011.5765]. 22. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "The spin-charge-family theory explains why the scalar Higgs carries the weak charge ± 1 and the hyper charge ^ 1", Proceedings to the 17th Workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models", Bled, July 20 - 28, 2014, p.163-182, [arxiv:1409.7791, arxiv:1212.4055]. 23. A. Ali in discussions and in private communication at the Singapore Conference on New Physics at the Large Hadron Collider, 29 February - 4 March 2016. 24. M. Neubert, in discussions at the Singapore. 13 The Symmetry of 4 x 4 Mass Matrices Predicted by... 243 25. A. Lenz, Advances in High Enery Physics 2013, ID 910275. 26. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B.F. Nielsen, "Do the present experiments exclude the existence of the fourth family members?", Proceedings to the 19th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 11-19 of July, 2016, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA ZaloZnistvo, Ljubljana December 2016, p.128-146 [arXiv:1703.09699]. 27. T. P. Cheng and Marc Sher, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987), 3484. 28. F. Mahmoudi and O. Stal, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035016. 29. C. Anastasioua, R. Boughezalb and F. Petrielloc, J. of High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 003. 30. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001. 31. A. Hoecker, "Physics at the LHC Run-2 and beyond", [arXiv:1611v1[hep-ex]]. 32. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, "The Spin-Charge-Family theory offers the explanation for all the assumptions of the Standard model, for the Dark matter, for the Matter-antimatter asymmetry, making several predictions", Proceedings to the Conference on New Physics at the Large Hadron Collider, 29 Februar - 4 March, 2016, Nanyang Executive Centre, NTU, Singapore, to be published, [arXiv: 1607.01618v1]. 33. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, D. Lukman, "Vector and scalar gauge fields with respect to d = (3 +1) in Kaluza-Klein theories and in the spin-charge-family theory", Proceedings to the 18th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 11-19 of July, 2015, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana December 2015, p. 158-164 [arXiv:1604.00675]. 34. D. Lukman, N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 103027, hep-th/1001.4679v5. 35. D. Lukman and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 465401 (2012), [arxiv:1205.1714, arxiv:1312.541, hep-ph/0412208 p.64-84]. 36. R. Franceshini, G.F. Giudice, J.F. Kamenik, M. McCullough, A.Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, M. Redi, F. Riva, A. Strumia, R. Torre, ArXiv:1512.04933. 37. CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-EX0-12-045. 38. CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 032004. 39. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, D. Lukman, "Vector and scalar gauge fields with respect to d = (3 +1) in Kaluza-Klein theories and in the spin-charge-family theory", Proceedings to the 18th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 11-19 of July, 2015, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana December 2015, p. 158-164 [arXiv:1604.00675]. 40. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. D 62, 044010, (2000)1-14, hep-th/9911032. 41. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, Jour. of High Energy Phys. 04 (2014)165-174 [arXiv:1212.2362v3]. 42. T. Troha, D. Lukman and N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. A 29 1450124 (2014), [arXiv:1312.1541]. 43. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B.F. Nielsen, "Fermionization in an arbitrary number of dimensions", Proceedings to the 18th Workshop "What comes beyond the standard models", Bled, 11-19 of July, 2015, Ed. N.S. Mankoc Borstnik, H.B. Nielsen, D. Lukman, DMFA Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana December 2015, p. 111-128 [arXiv.1602.03175]. 44. T. Kaluza, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Math. Phys. 96 (1921) 69, O. Klein, Z.Phys. 37 (1926) 895. 45. The authors of the works presented in An introduction to Kaluza-Klein theories, Ed. by H. C. Lee, World Scientific, Singapore 1983, T. Appelquist, A. Chodos, P.G.O. Freund (Eds.), Modern Kaluza-Klein Theories, Reading, USA: Addison Wesley, 1987. 46. D. Lukman, N. S. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. Nielsen, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 10302 [arXiv:1001.4679v4].