Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 809–818 EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS BEARING STEEL VPLIV DU[IKA NA TOPLOTNO DEFORMACIJO MARTENZITNEGA NERJA VNEGA LE@AJNEGA JEKLA Yaohui Song 1 , Yibo Lu 2 , Yugui Li 2* , Haosong Sun 3 , Huaying Li 3 , Hui Xu 3 , Yihang Wang 2 1 Heavy Machinery Education Engineering Department Research Center, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, Shanxi, China 2 School of Mechanical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China 3 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China Prejem rokopisa – received: 2024-05-16; sprejem za objavo – accepted for publication: 2024-10-24 doi:10.17222/mit.2024.1194 The thermal deformation behaviors of martensitic stainless bearing steels (0.16N, 0N) in the temperature range 850–1150 °C, strain rate 0.01–10 s –1 , and deformation of 60 % were studied using a single-pass compression experiment. After adding 0.16 % nitrogen, the peak stress of the martensitic stainless bearing steel increased under all thermal forming conditions, and the aver- age peak stress increased by about 33.724 MPa. The strain-rate sensitivity diagram, power dissipation diagram, instability factor diagram, and thermal processing diagram under different strains were constructed based on the stress-strain curve. The thermal deformation activation energy under different strains was constructed and combined with a metallographic structure analysis. The results show that under the same conditions, the occurrence of DRX in 0.16N bearing steel is less than that of 0N bearing steel, but the grains are finer than those of 0N bearing steel. Keywords: martensitic stainless bearing steel, thermal deformation behavior, power dissipation diagram, thermal deformation activation energy, thermal processing diagram Avtorji v ~lanku opisujejo {tudijo obna{anja dveh martenzitnih le`ajnih jekel; enega brez du{ika in drugega legiranega z 0,16 w/% N (ozna~enih kot 0N in 0.16N), med toplotno (termi~no) tla~no deformacijo v temperaturnem obmo~ju med 850 °C in 1150 °C, pri hitrosti deformacije med 0,01 s –1 in 10 s –1 ter 60 % deformacijo. Po legiranju jekla z 0,16 w/% du{ika se je maksimalna tla~na napetost martenzitnega nerjavnega le`ajnega jekla znatno pove~ala pri vseh izbranih pogojih termi~ne deformacije. V povpre~ju je ta napetost zna{ala pribli`no 33,724 GPa. Avtorji so na osnovi izvedenih eksperimentov in dobljenih diagramov napetost- deformacija konstruirali diagram ob~utljivosti na hitrost deformacije, disipacijski diagram mo~i, diagram faktorja nestabilnosti in diagram termi~nega procesiranja. Avtorji so konstruirali tudi diagrame termi~ne aktivacijske energije za deformacijo pri razli~nih deformacijah in ga kombinirali z metalografskimi analizami mikrostrukture. Rezultati analiz so nadalje pokazali, da je pri enakih pogojih termi~ne deformacije obseg dinami~ne rekristalizacije (DRX) pri le`ajnem jeklu 0.16N manj{i kot pri le`ajnem jeklu 0N, toda z du{ikom legirano jeklo ima finej{a kristalna zrna. Klju~ne besede: martenzitno nerjavno le`ajno jeklo, termi~na deformacija, diagram raztrosa mo~i, aktivacijska energija toplotne deformacije, diagram toplotnega procesiranja 1 INTRODUCTION Bearings are essential components in modern indus- trial systems, affecting the stability and longevity of me- chanical equipment. Selecting the right bearing steel is critical, as high-quality materials provide superior me- chanical properties, including strength, hardness, and re- sistance to wear and shock. 1 However, traditional, high- carbon, chromium martensitic stainless steels, such as 9Cr18 and 9Cr18Mo, are limited by the presence of coarse eutectic carbides. 2 Nitrogen alloying has been shown to refine carbides and grains, enhancing the steel’s strength without sacrificing toughness, making ni- trogen-containing martensitic stainless steel a promising candidate for high-performance bearings. 3 Research has predominantly focused on optimizing thermal treatment processes and improving the material’s corrosion, fa- tigue, and impact resistance. 4 For effective production of nitrogen-alloyed bearing forgings, it is crucial to explore the material’s plastic deformation behavior, micro- structural evolution, and thermal processing properties at elevated temperatures. This study aims to establish a solid theoretical basis and practical guidelines for opti- mizing the thermal forging parameters, ensuring that stainless-steel bearings achieve the desired micro- structure and mechanical properties during manufac - ture. 5–8 In recent years, researchers have made the following studies on stainless bearing steel. Zhang et al. 9 studied the effects of forming temperature and strain rate on the austenitizing and dynamic recrystallization of 30CrMnSiNi2A steel. According to the experimental re- sults, the constitutive equation and machining diagram of 30CrMnSiNi2A steel are established. The unsafe zone of 30CrMnSiNi2A steel is not only distributed in the region with low temperature and low strain rate but also in the Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 809 UDK 669.14.018.8:537.226.86 ISSN 1580-2949 Original scientific article/Izvirni znanstveni ~lanek Mater. Tehnol. *Corresponding author's e-mail: lygtykd@163.com (Yugui Li) region with high temperature and high strain rate. 30CrMnSiNi2A steel exhibits ideal thermoplastic formability when heat treated at 1050 °C at a strain rate of 0.1–1 s –1 . Feng et al. 10 developed a machining diagram of a 20CrMnTiH steel using a dynamic material model in the temperature range 850–1150 °C and a strain variabil- ity of 0.01–1 s –1 . According to the developed machining diagram, the thermal working characteristics of 20CrMnTiH steel are analyzed, and the optimal thermal working parameter values of 20CrMnTiH steel are found to obtain good thermal working properties and a small grain size in the process parameter range of 1036–1070 °C, 0.1–1 s –1 . Lin et al. 11 studied the dynamic recrystallization mechanism of bearing steel G13Cr4Mo4Ni4V . The results show that because the de- formation ability of ferrite and carbide is different from that of the matrix, their dissolution, precipitation behav- ior, and interaction with dislocation during deformation are the main reasons for inducing steel recrystallization. Despite numerous studies on the properties of martensitic stainless steel, research focusing on the influ- ence of nitrogen content on its thermal deformation be- havior under high-temperature conditions is relatively scarce, limiting the material’s further development and application. To address this gap, we systematically inves- tigated two types of bearing steels: nitrogen-containing martensitic stainless bearing steel (0.16N) and nitro- gen-free martensitic stainless bearing steel (0N). Through single-pass compression experiments conducted at temperatures ranging from 850 °C to 1150 °C, strain rates of 0.01 s –1 to 10 s –1 , and 60 % deformation, we es- tablished comprehensive thermal processing maps based on stress-strain curves. These maps include strain-rate sensitivity diagrams, power-dissipation diagrams, insta- bility-factor diagrams, and thermal processing diagrams under different strains, providing a new theoretical foun- dation for optimizing hot-working processes. Addi- tionally, we calculated the thermal deformation activa- tion energy and combined it with metallographic structure analyses to reveal the mechanisms by which ni- trogen addition influences dynamic recrystallization and grain refinement. This study seeks to contribute to the understanding of how nitrogen affects the thermal defor- mation behavior of martensitic stainless bearing steel, of- fering insights that might assist in enhancing its perfor- mance through controlled hot-working practices. 2 EXPERIMENTAL PART The alloys used in this study are bearing steel with a nitrogen content of 0.16 % (from now on referred to as 0.16N) and nitrogen-free bearing steel (from now on re- ferred to as 0N), both of which are cut in to incompletely forged ingots with a forging ratio of 1:2. The primary chemical constituents are shown in Table 1. The cylin- drical compression specimens of 0.16N and 0N were prepared, with a height of 15 mm and a diameter of 10 mm. A Gleeble-3800 thermal simulation testing ma- chine conducted the thermal compression test in a vac- uum. In order to reduce the influence of friction and pre- vent adhesion between the sample and the equipment, graphite lubricant was coated on both ends of the sam- ple, and a tantalum sheet and graphite sheet were added. The thermal compression process is shown in Fig- ure 1a. The test strain rates are 0.01–10 s –1, respectively; Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 810 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 Figure 1: a) Schematic of the thermal deformation process; Original microstructure: b) 0.16N, c) 0N Table 1: Chemical composition of 0.16N and 0N (w/%) Materials C Si Mn P Cr Mo N Fe 0.16N 0.3 0.51 0.42 0.002 15.16 0.83 0.16 Bal. 0N 0.3 0.51 0.42 0.002 15.16 0.83 0.00 Bal. the temperature range is 850–1150 °C, the deformation rate is 60 %, and the true strain is 0.916. The specific process is heating at 10 °C/s to 1200 °C for 2 min and then cooling at 5 °C/s to the deformation temperature, compression after 30 s, and water cooling immediately after compression to retain the high-temperature tissue. The compressed sample was cut along the compression direction and heated in a water bath with 2g KMnO 4 + 6mLH 2 SO 4 +94mLH 2 O etchant for 40 min. Then, OM was used to observe the metallographic structure. The original microstructure is shown in Figures 1b and 1c. 3 RESULTS 3.1 Stress-strain curve The stress-strain curves obtained by thermal com- pression of 0.16N and 0N stainless bearing steels are shown in Figure 2. The trend of experimental curves of the two kinds of steel is generally the same, and the flow stress of the material increases with the increase of strain rate under the condition of keeping the deformation tem- perature unchanged. Under the same strain-rate condi- tion, the flow stress of the material shows a decreasing trend with an increase in temperature. This indicates that both steels are positively sensitive to strain rate and neg- atively sensitive to temperature. In addition, under the same conditions, the flow stress of 0.16N bearing steel is higher than that of 0N bearing steel. It can be seen from Figure 2i that after adding 0.16 % nitrogen, the peak stress under all thermal forming conditions is increased, and about 33.724 MPa increases the average peak stress. This data indicates that the addition of nitrogen has a positive effect on improving the deformation resistance of the material. Especially when the deformation is car- ried out at 850 °C and the low strain rate of 0.1 s –1 , the increase in the stress value is particularly prominent, which indicates that the solid solution strengthening of nitrogen and the nailing effect of carbides and nitrides are the most significant under this condition. The consis- tent trend in the overall increment ratio shown in Figure 2i indicates that the increase in deformation resistance is uniform and steady, which helps to ensure that the mate- rial maintains high-performance stability over a wide range of application conditions. Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 811 Figure 2: Stress-strain curves of 0.16N at different rates: a) 0.01s –1 ,b )0 . 1s –1 ,c )1s –1 ,d )1s –1 ; stress-strain curves of 0N at different rates: e) 0.01 s –1 ,f )0 . 1s –1 ,g )1s –1 ,h )1 0s –1 ; i) comparison diagram of peak-stress difference and increment between 0.16N and 0N 3.2 Comparison of thermal processing properties 3.2.1 Strain-rate sensitivity index Generally speaking, the strain rate affects the high- temperature deformation characteristics of steel. In order to understand the effect of strain rate on material behav- ior deeply, many researchers have introduced the strain-rate sensitivity index to conduct in-depth studies of various materials. The specific mathematical expres- sion of the index is as follows: 12 m = ∂ ∂ (ln ) (ln ) $ $ (1) Figure 3 shows the strain-rate sensitivity diagram of 0.16N and 0N martensitic stainless bearing steel at strains of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. In the process of thermal de- formation, m represents the sensitivity of the flow stress to the strain rate, and the greater m is, the more sensitive the flow stress of the material is to the strain rate. Ac- cording to the value of m, it can be divided into three grades: 13 low m value (m<0.15), high m value (0.20.3). By ob- serving the strain-rate sensitivity graphs of the two mate- rials under each strain, we see that the low m-value re- gion decreases gradually. In contrast, the high m-value and superplastic regions increase first and then decrease. Taking 0N bearing steel as an example, when the strain is 0.3, the low m value zone is 950–1075 °C and (1075–1200 °C, 0.13–10 s –1 ); when the strain is in- creased to 0.7, the main low m value zone is 950–1000 °C, 0.01–0.05 s –1 and 950–1000 °C, 2.71–10 s –1 ). When the strain is 0.3, the high m-value re- gion is located at 1100–1150 °C, 0.01–0.05 s –1 . With the increase of the strain, the high m value region first in- creases and is located at 1025–1150 °C, 0.01–0.08 s –1 and 1100–1150 °C, 2.71–10 s –1 . After the area is re- duced, located at 1100–1150 °C, 0.01–0.08 s –1 . The superplastic region of the two materials is slightly differ- ent. The superplastic region of the 0N bearing steel is mainly concentrated in 1125–1150 °C, #<– 4s –1 (under different strains), while the superplastic region of the 0.16N bearing steel is first concentrated in 1100–1150 °C, #<0.02 s –1 . Then, with the increase of strain, the superplastic region of the two materials be- comes slightly different. It was gradually transferred to the low-temperature and low-rate region 875–975 °C, #<0.02 s –1 . Note that the superplastic phenomenon of 0N bearing steel usually occurs at high temperature and low speed, while the superplastic phenomenon of 0.16N bearing steel tends to shift to low temperature and high speed with increased strain. In addition, it is not difficult to see from the figure that the area of high m region and superplastic region of 0.16N bearing steel under different strains is larger than that of 0N bearing steel, indicating that the flow stress of 0.16N bearing steel is more sensi- tive to the strain rate. 3.2.2 Power dissipation efficiency In thermal processing engineering, different power- dissipation efficiency ( ) values correspond to different microstructure-evolution mechanisms, and the three-di- mensional contours consisting of power-dissipation value, temperature, and strain rate are called power-dissi- pation diagrams. The higher the value, the better the thermal processability of the region in which it is lo- cated, indicating the better microstructure evolution mechanism, while the negative value indicates the possi- ble unstable microstructure. When the m value is constant and non-linear with temperature or strain rate, the power-dissipation effi- ciency ( ) can be expressed as: 14 h J J m m == + max 2 1 (2) Figure 4 shows the power-dissipation efficiency of 0.16N and 0N martensitic stainless bearing steel when the strain is 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. It is not difficult to see that the change in power-dissipation efficiency is very similar to that of the strain-rate sensitivity coefficient: regions Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 812 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 Figure 3: Comparison of strain-rate sensitivity index: a) 0.16N bearing steel, b) 0N bearing steel with low value ( <15 %) gradually decrease, while re- gions with high m value increase first and then decrease. The three dynamic evolution processes of work harden- ing, DRV , and DRX are closely related to the power-dis- sipation values, and the value represents different mi- croscopic transformations. generally reflects the microstructure-deformation mechanism; 13 0.2< <0.3 is DRV , and 0.2< <0.3 is DRX. Taking 0.9 strain as an ex- ample, the high value ( >35 %) of 0N bearing steel is mainly concentrated in the high-temperature and low-strain-rate zone (1100–1150 °C, #< 0.05 s –1 ), and the high-temperature and high-strain-rate zone (1125–1150 °C, #>4.5 s –1 ). The high value ( >35 %) of 0.16N bearing steel is mainly concentrated in the low-strain-rate zone (850–1150 °C, #<0.05s –1 ). In the evolution process, varies from 6.4 % to 49.4 %. Both steel sheets’ high region occurs at high temperatures and low rates (1100–1150 °C, #<0.05 s –1 ) because a higher deformation temperature is conducive to grain-boundary migration. In contrast, a lower strain rate provides a longer deformation time and increases the time for recrystallization. The dynamic recrystallization occurs entirely. 3.2.3 Instability factor The power-dissipation-efficiency diagram is estab- lished to clearly distinguish the distribution of power-dissipation efficiency during the thermal deforma- tion. However, the region of material instability cannot be known from this figure. Therefore, Prasad et al. pro- posed the evaluation criterion of plastic deformation and rheological instability based on Ziegler’s criterion of continuous large plastic deformation, and its primary ex- pression is as follows: 14 # # ( ) ln ln = + +< ∂ ∂ m m m 1 0 (3) Figure 5 shows the instability diagram of 0N and 0.16N martensitic stainless bearing steel under 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 strains. The figure shows the relationship be- tween the instability factor and the temperature and strain rate. The yellow region is the unstable region Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 813 Figure 5: Comparison of instability factors: a) 0.16N bearing steel, b) 0N bearing steel Figure 4: Comparison of power-dissipation values: a) 0.16N bearing steel, b) 0N bearing steel ( <0), and the blue region is the stable region (% 0). The instability zone of 0N bearing steel is mainly concen- trated in (875–1000 °C, 0.37–10 s –1 ), and a small part of the instability zone is at low temperature and low strain rate (T < 875°C, 0.01–1 s –1 ). With the increase of strain, the instability zone decreases and then increases. For 0.16N bearing steel, the instability zone is concentrated at 850–1050 °C, 0.01–0.6 s –1 , and the instability zone de- creases first and then increases with the increase of strain. Generally speaking, the low deformation tempera- ture and high strain rate in thermal working lead to many dislocation proliferation and inter-delivery entanglement, resulting in an unstable flow. 15 3.2.4 Thermal working diagram Based on the Kumar Prasad criterion, the thermal working diagram of 0.16N and 0N bearing steels can be obtained by superimposing the power-dissipation-effi- ciency diagram and the instability diagram. The thermal working diagram of the two steels under the conditions of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 strains is shown in Figure 6. The optimal processing region should be selected to be as large as possible under no instability 16 . As shown in Figures 6a to 6c, 0.16N, the instability region has lit- tle change with the increase of strain, and the essential characteristics of the thermal processing diagram are similar. The instability range under different strains is approximately 850–1025 °C, 0.01–0.6 s –1 ). The thermal working of the 0.16N bearing steel should avoid the low temperature and low strain rate area at 1050–1200 °C, 0.01–0.08 s –1 suitable for processing. 0N With the in- crease of strain, the instability region always has two parts, and the essential characteristics of the thermal working diagram are similar. Under different strains, there are instability regions of T < 875 °C, 0.01–1 s –1 , 875–1000 °C, 0.37–10 s –1 . The optimal processing re- gion of 0N and 0.16N is also suitable for processing (1050–1200 °C, 0.01–0.08 s –1 ). 3.3 Microstructure analysis Metal plastic deformation is a thermal activation pro- cess; at this time the crystal atoms will migrate to a new equilibrium or non-equilibrium position, which requires the atoms’ energy to cross a “threshold value,” and the energy required is called the deformation activation. The smaller the activation energy, the easier the deformation is to perform. The formula for calculating the activation energy is as follows: 17 {} {} QR T T = ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ln( ln sinh( ) ln sinh( ) (/ ) # $ $ 1 ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ # (4) The activation energy distributions of 0.16N and 0N under different strains are shown in Figures 7a and 7b. For both 0.16N and 0N, Q decreases with the increase of temperature and strain rate under the same strain. With the increase of strain, the area of the high Q value region (red region, 0.16N: greater than 580 kJ/mol; 0N: greater than 510 kJ/mol) shows a decreasing trend. It is not diffi- cult to see that from 0.3 strain to 0.6 strain, the Q value Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 814 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 Figure 6: Thermal working diagram of 0.16N bearing steel under different strain: a) 0.3, b) 0.6, c) 0.9; Thermal working diagram of 0N bearing steel under different strain: d) 0.3, e) 0.6, f) 0.9 decreases sharply (taking 0.16N as an example, 587.65 to 511.58 kJ/mol) because the flow stress corresponding to 0.3 strain is close to the peak stress, and the work hardening is the most serious at this time. From 0.6 strain to 0.9 strain, Q value slowly decreases (taking 0.16N as an example, 511.58 kJ/mol to 494.13 kJ/mol), which is because DRV and DRX phenomena will occur with the increase of strain variable, which can play a softening effect and reduce the degree of work hardening 18 . After 0.6 strain, as shown in Figure 2b, the stress-strain curve will enter a relatively smooth phase where deformation is more likely to occur. Compared with the activation-energy-distribution diagram of 0.16N and 0N, the thermal deformation activation energy of 0.16N bearing steel (531.12 kJ/mol(average)) is higher than that of 0N bearing steel (457.99 kJ/mol(average)), indicating that the deformation resistance of 0.16N bear- ing steel is better than that of 0N bearing steel. This is mainly due to the solid-solution strengthening effect of nitrogen in steel. The existence of nitrogen atoms effec- tively enhances the deformation resistance of the mate- rial. The temperature distribution and strain rate inside the compressed sample vary greatly, so the region where the temperature and strain rate are consistent with the exper- imental setting conditions is first determined according to the results. The metallographic diagrams in Figure 8 were taken after the thermal compression was com- pleted; the strain was 0.916. The diagram of deformation activation energy at 0.9 strain can be analyzed, as shown in Figure 7a. Q decreases with the increase of tempera- ture and strain rate, which is precisely corresponding to Figure 8, as shown in Figure 8b, 8f, 8j and 8n. When the strain rate is constant at 0.1 s –1 , the microstructure at 850 °C is deformed grains caused by the elongation of the original grains, fibrous structures formed at some grain boundaries, and small recrystallized grains. The elongation direction is perpendicular to the compression direction (CD), indicating that dynamic recrystallization will begin to occur. At 950 °C, the original grains are surrounded by many dynamically recrystallized grains formed near the grain boundaries. The presence of a typ- ical chain structure is formed by bowing out the nucleus at a high-angle boundary (HAB), which is characteristic of discontinuous recrystallization (DDRX) behavior. 19 The results show that grain-boundary expansion induced by strain-induced grain-boundary migration is the pri- mary mechanism of DRX nucleation, and high deforma- tion temperature promotes the DRX process. At 1050 °C there are a large number of small uniform particles. At 1150 °C the recrystallized grains grew uniformly. It shows that the growth of recrystallized grains is the main reason for the microstructure change with increased de- formation temperature at high temperatures. In combina- tion with Figure 7a, DRX grain growth behavior at 1050–1150 °C is more likely to occur and requires less Q than DDRX at 850–950 °C. Figure 9 compares the microstructure change behav- ior of 0.16N and 0N at 1050 °C and the upper and lower metallography. Firstly, it can be seen that the recrystallization of 0.16N bearing steel is less than that of 0N bearing steel under the same conditions, but the grains are finer than that of 0N bearing steel. In combi- nation with Figure 7a and 7b, it can be found that Q of 0.16N is significantly larger than that of 0N, indicating that DRX of 0.16N under the same conditions requires more deformation energy than that of 0N. This is be- cause, with the increase of nitrogen content when the austenite region is experienced in the cooling process of smelting, nitrogen has a more vital refining ability for austenite structure; nitrogen contributes to the short- range ordering of atoms so that it can be pinning disloca- tion and the interstitial nitrogen atoms have an ability to hinder grain-boundary migration. 20 They can delay grain growth, so the material with a high nitrogen content has finer grains. In addition, by comparing the deforma- tion-activation-energy diagram of 0.16N and 0N (Figure 7a and 7b), at 1050 °C the strain rate of 0N varies from Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 815 Figure 7: Distribution of deformation activation energy under 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 strains: a) 0.16N, b) 0N Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 816 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 Figure 8: metallographic diagram of 0.16N bearing steel: a) 850-0.01 s –1 , b) 850-0.1 s –1 , c) 850-1 s –1 , d) 850-10 s –1 , e) 950-0.01 s –1 , f) 950-0.1 s –1 , g) 950-1 s –1 , h) 950-10 s –1 , i) 1050-0.01 s –1 , j) 1050-0.1 s –1 , k) 1050-1 s –1 , l) 1050-10 s –1 , m) 1150-0.01 s –1 , n) 1150-0.1 s –1 , o) 1150-1 s –1 , p) 1150-10 s –1 Figure 9: Comparison of 0.16N bearing steel and 0N bearing steel metallographic diagram: 0.16N: a) 1050-0.01 s –1 , b) 1050-0.1 s –1 , c) 1050-1 s –1 , d) 1050-1 s –1 ; 0N: e) 1050-0.01 s –1 , f) 1050-0.1 s –1 , g) 1050-1 s –1 , h) 1050-10 s –1 0.01–10 s –1 , and the value of Q does not change much. However, for 0.16N, the color of Q changes from 0.01–0.1 s –1 (1050 °C), the value of Q changes a little from 0.1–1 s –1 , and the value of Q also changes signifi- cantly from 1 to 10 s –1 , which is precisely consistent with the change of metallographic diagram. It shows that 0.16 is sensitive to 0.01 s –1 and 10 s –1 . Combined with Fig- ure 9, at 1050 °C the dynamic recrystallization behavior of 0N has fully occurred, and the strain-rate effect on DRX is less evident than that of 0.16N. 4 CONCLUSIONS Based on the stress-strain curve, strain-rate-sensitiv- ity diagram, power-dissipation diagram, instability-factor diagram, and thermal working diagram under different strains are constructed. The activation energy of the ther- mal deformation under different strains was constructed and combined with microstructure analysis. (1) 0.16N and 0N are both positively sensitive to strain rate and negatively sensitive to temperature. In ad- dition, under the same conditions, the flow stress of 0.16N bearing steel is higher than that of 0N bearing steel, and about 33.724 MPa increases the average peak stress. (2) The superplasticity of 0N bearing steel usually occurs at high temperature and low speed, while the superplasticity of 0.16N bearing steel tends to shift to low temperature and high speed with the increase of strain. The high value ( >35 %) of 0N bearing steel is mainly concentrated in 1100–1150 °C, #<0.05 s –1 , 1125–1150 °C, #>4.5 s –1 . The high value ( >35 %) of 0.16N bearing steel is mainly concentrated in 850–1150 °C, #<0.05 s –1 . Both 0.16N and 0N are suitable for processing at high temperatures and low rates. (3) Under the same conditions, the occurrence of DRX in 0.16N bearing steel is less than that in 0N bear- ing steel, but the grains are finer than those in 0N bear- ing steel. DRX grain growth at 1050–1150 °C is more likely to occur and requires less Q than DDRX at 850–950 °C, regardless of 0.16 or 0N. At 1050 °C, 0.16 is more sensitive to 0.01 s –1 and 10 s –1 , while dynamic recrystallization behavior of 0N has fully occurred, and the effect of strain rate on DRX is not apparent. Acknowledgements This project is supported by the Central Guiding Lo- cal Science and Technology Development Fund Project (YDZJSX2021A036), the Graduate Education Innova- tion Project of Taiyuan University of Science and Tech- nology (SY2023036), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52375364), the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (TZLH20230818001), and Shanxi Province’s Key Core Technology and Common Technology Research and Development Project (20201102017). 5 REFERENCES 1 F. Yu, X. P. Chen, H. F. Xu, H. Dong, Y . Q. Weng, W. Q. Cao, Cur- rent Status of Metallurgical Quality and Fatigue Performance of Rolling Bearing Steel and Development Direction of High-End Bear- ing Steel, Acta Metall. Sin., 56 (2020) 4, 513–522, doi:10.11900/ 0412.1961.2019.00361 2 R. Wang, F. H. Li, Z. Q. Yu, Y . Kang, M. Li, Y . Hu, H. R. An, J. Fan, F. Miao, Y . H. Zhao, J. Eckert, Z. J. Yan, Influences of partial substi- tution of C by N on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 9Cr18Mo martensitic stainless steel, Mater. Des., 236 (2023), doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112497 3 M. Seifert, S. Siebert, S. Huth, W. Theisen, H. Berns, New Develop- ments in Martensitic Stainless Steels Containing C plus N, Steel Res. Int, 86 (2015) 12, 1508–1516, doi:10.1002/srin.201400503 4 S. J. Zheng, J. H. Liu, L. Xu, S. M. Wen, Z. H. Han, Hot deformation behavior of high nitrogen martensitic stainless steels, Mater. Res. Ex- press, 6 (2019) 1, doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aae5e8 5 H. Feng, Z. H. Jiang, H. B. Li, W. C. Jiao, X. X. Li, H. C. Zhu, S. C. Zhang, B. B. Zhang, M.H. Cai, Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructural Evolution of High Nitrogen Martensitic Stainless Steel 30Cr15Mo1N, Steel Res. Int., 88 (2017) 12, doi:10.1002/ srin.201700149 6 X. Li, L. F. Hou, Y . H. Wei, Z. Y . Wei, Constitutive Equation and Hot Processing Map of a Nitrogen-Bearing Martensitic Stainless Steel, METALS, 10 (2020) 11, doi:10.3390/met10111502 7 W. J. Liu, J. Li, S. H. Li, J. H. Li, X. J. Li, Effect of Nitrogen on the Hot Deformation Behavior of 0.4C-13Cr Martensitic Stainless Steel, Steel Res. Int., 92 (2021) 8, doi:10.1002/srin.202100020 8 Z. G. Nie, G. Wang, J. C. Yu, D. H. Liu, Y . M. Rong, Phase-based constitutive modeling and experimental study for dynamic mechani- cal behavior of martensitic stainless steel under high strain rate in a thermal cycle, Mech. Mater., 101 (2016), 160–169, doi:10.1016/ j.mechmat.2016.08.003 9 J. Y . Zhang, Y . Tang, H. M. Zhou, Q. Chen, J. Zhou, Y . Meng, Inves- tigation on thermal rheological behavior and processing map of 30CrMnSiNi2A ultra-strength steel, Int. J. Mater. Form., 14 (2021) 4, 507–521, doi:10.1007/s12289-019-01531-1 10 W. Feng, F. Qin, H. Long, Hot workability analysis and processing parameters optimisation for 20CrMnTiH steel by combining process- ing map with microstructure, IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 45 (2018) 4, 317–324, doi:10.1080/03019233.2016.1264145 11 H. A. Lin, M. S. Yang, B. Song, Study on hot compressive deforma- tion behavior and microstructure evolution of G13Cr4Mo4Ni4V steel, Mater. Today Commun., 38 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm. 2024.108429 12 Y . C. Zhu, Q. H. Wang, Z. Q. Huang, L. Qin, Z. L. Li, L. F. Ma, Strain Hardening Exponent and Strain Rate Sensitivity Exponent of Cast AZ31B Magnesium Alloy, METALS, 12 (2022) 11, doi:10.3390/met12111942 13 L. Chen, B. Zhang, Y . Yang, T. L. Zhao, Y . Xu, Q. Wang, B. Zan, J. Cai, K. S. Wang, X. Chen, Evolution of hot processing map and microstructure of as-forged nickel-based superalloy during hot defor- mation, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 24 (2023), 7638–7653, doi:10.1016/ j.jmrt.2023.05.060 14 J. Luo, M. Q. Li, Efficiency of Power Dissipation and Instability Cri- terion for Processing Maps in Hot Forming, CMC-Comput. Mater. Continua, 18 (2010) 3, 271–299 15 L. Han, H. Y . Zhang, J. Cheng, G. Zhou, C. Wang, L. J. Chen, Ther- mal Deformation Behavior of Ti-6Mo-5V-3Al-2Fe Alloy, CRYS- TALS, 11 (2021) 10, doi:10.3390/cryst11101245 16 H. Y . Qin, Z. T. Li, G. P. Zhao, W. Y . Zhang, Q. Tian, C. Wang, Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructure and Mechanical Properties Evolution of Forged GH4742 Superalloy, Rare Met. Mater. Eng., 51 (2022) 11, 4227–4236 Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818 817 17 Y . H. Song, Z. H. Cai, G. H. Zhao, Y . G. Li, H. Y . Li, M. X. Zhang, Hot deformation behavior of 309L stainless steel, Mater. Today Commun., 36 (2023), doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106877 18 L. X. Li, B. Ye, S. Liu, S. D. Hu, B. Li, Inverse analysis of the stress-strain curve to determine the materials models of work harden- ing and dynamic recovery, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 636 (2015), 243–248, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.115 19 L. X. Ouyang, R. Luo, Y . W. Gui, Y . Cao, L. L. Chen, Y . J. Cui, H. K. Bian, K. Aoyagi, K. Yamanaka, A. Chiba, Hot deformation char- acteristics and dynamic recrystallization mechanisms of a Co-Ni-based superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 788 (2020), doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.139638 20 T. Masumura, T. Tsuchiyama, S. Takaki, T. Koyano, K. Adachi, Dif- ference between carbon and nitrogen in thermal stability of metastable 18 %Cr-8 %Ni austenite, Scr. Mater., 154 (2018), 8–11, doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.019 Y. SONG et al.: EFFECT OF NITROGEN ON THE THERMAL DEFORMATION BEHA VIOR OF MARTENSITIC STAINLESS ... 818 Materiali in tehnologije / Materials and technology 58 (2024) 6, 809–818