GEOLOGIJA 56/1, 107-128, Ljubljana 2013 doi:10.5474/geologija.2013.009 Mineral chemistry and genesis of Zr, Th, U, Nb, Pb, P, Ce and F enriched peralkaline granites of El-Sibai shear zone, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt Mohamed A. ALI Nuclear Materials Authority P. O. Box: 530 El-Maadi, Cairo, Egypt; e-mail: dr_mohamed1966@yahoo.com Prejeto / Received 3. 8. 2011; Sprejeto / Accepted 20. 5. 2013 Key words: Thorite, zircon, zirconolite, cerite-(Ce), El-Sibai peralkaline granite, electron probe microanalyses, hydrothermal fluids, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Abstract El-Sibai mineralized shear zone trending NNE-SSW is located at the northern segment of Gabal El-Sibai (500 m in length and 0.5 to 1.5 m in width). Rocks along the shear zone show different types of alterations such as hematization, kaolinitization, fluoritization, and silicification. These alterations are good traps for rare metals of thorite, ferrocolumbite, pyroclore, plumbopyroclore, fluorite, cerite-(Ce), zircon, Th-rich zircon, zirconolite (mixture of zircon & columbite), fluorapatite, titanite, and monazite minerals. The detailed mineralogical study of the El-Sibai shear zone revealed its enrichment in Th, Zr, Nb, Pb, U, F, P, LREE (Ce), especially concerning the hematization processes. The close correlation of ferruginated (hematitized) samples with high radioactivity is related to the high ability of iron oxides for adsorption of radioactive elements from their solutions. The rare-metal minerals found in altered peralkaline granites (shear zone) are associated with hematitization, albititization, chloritization, fluoritization, and pyritization. Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) provides an indication of a range of solid solution between thorite and zircon, in which intermediate phases, such as Th-rich zircon were formed. These phases have higher sum of all cations per formula (2.0 to 2.09 atoms per formula unit, for 4 oxygen atoms) than that of ideal thorite and zircon. This is attributed to the presence of substantial amount of interstitial cations such as U, Y, Ca, and Al in these phases. Altered zircon enriched in Th and U (Th-rich zircon) preferentially involves coupled substitution Ca2+ + (Th,U)4+ ^ 2Zr4+ + 2Si4+, implying that significant amount of U and Th may enter the Zr and Si position in zircon. Thorite and Th-rich zircon are related to hydrothermal fluid. Also the genesis of the studied zircon is related to metasomatic hydrothermal zircon (MHZ). The abundantly detected zircon, Th-rich zircon, Th-bearing minerals and fluorite of demonstrably hydrothermal origin can be attributed to the role of fluorine-rich fluids. Although Zr and Th are generally considered as highly immobile elements, yet the occurrence of zircon indicates that their significant concentrations can be transported under specified F-rich fluids. The hydrothermal origin could be accepted for the thorite, huttonite monazite, zircon, Th-rich zircon, ferrocolumbite, pyroclore, plumbopyrochlore, zirconolite, fluorite, cerite-(Ce), fluorapatite within the El-Sibai altered peralkaline granites (shear zone). Introduction Egyptian granitic rocks of Pan-African age occupy about 40 % of the exposed Precambrian of the Eastern Desert and Sinai. They are subdivided into two distinct major groups, namely the Older and the Younger granites. The Older granites have been referred to in the Egyptian literature as Grey granites (Hume, 1935; El-Ramly & Akaad, 1960), syn- to late-orogenic plutonites (El-Shazly, 1964), synorogenic granites (El-Gaby, 1975) and G1-granites (Hussein et al., 1982). They were em-placed around 930-850 Ma ago, and possibly extend to 711 Ma (El-Manharawy, 1977; Stern & Hedge, 1985; Hassan & Hashad, 1990). On the other hand, the younger granites (about 30 %) were previously mapped as Gattarian granites (Hume, 1935), red and pink granites (El-Ramly & Akaad, 1960), late- to post-orogenic granites (El-Gaby, 1975) and G-II to G-III granites (Hussein et al., 1982). They were emplaced around 622-430 Ma ago (El-Manharawy, 1977; Stern & Hedge, 1985; Hassan & Hashad, 1990; Moghazi et al., 2004; MoussA et al., 2008, Ali & Lentz, 2011). Shear zones are known to represent important mechanical weaknesses that affect the geology of the continental lithosphere as a kinematic response to deformation (Butler et al., 1995). Stern (1985) and Sultan et al. (1988) suggested through their compilation of Landsat thematic mapper scenes of the Arabian-Nubian Shield (ANS) that the Najd system extends into the Egyptian Eastern Desert and dominates the structural pattern within its central part. Greiling et al. (1993) believed that shear zones in the Pan African basement of the Eastern Desert may be related to com-pressional as well as extensional stresses; however, both types of deformation led to formation of antiformal structures on a regional scale. Kamal El-Din (1991) described Gabal El-Sibai swell as a doubly plunging anticline trending NW-SE, where the core is occupied by Pre-Pan-African gneisses intercalated in the upper parts by amphibolites. Recently, Ali (2001) delineated a NNE-SSW shear zone at Gabal El-Sibai peral-kaline granite (Fig. 1). Abdel-Fattah et al. (2001) studied the anorogenic magmatism; chemical evolution of the Mount El-Sibai A-Type complex (Egypt) and implications for the origin of within-plate felsic magmas. Moussa (2001) studied Gabal El-Sebai alkali feldspar granite and its potentiality to host U-Th mineralization. Earlier geochro-nological studies indicate that El-Sibai complex is dated at 455 Ma (whole rock K-Ar method) and at 525 Ma (mica K-Ar method): both ages were determined by El-Ramly (1962). Geochemical studies of the El-Sibai area, including the mineralized shear zone were carried out by Abdel Kader et al. (2001), who concluded that the younger granites are classified into the following types: a) biotite granites and b) alkali-feldspar granites. The biotite granites are classified as monzo-to syenogranites, weakly to mildly alkaline, peraluminous of differentiated I-types, of post orogenic volcanics arc tectonic setting. While the alkali-feldspar granites (El-Sibai granites) are strongly alkaline to peralkaline, A1-type is rift-related anorogenic (within plate granites or WPG). Ibrahim et al. (2003) studied the mineralogi-cal and spectrometric characteristics of El-Sibai shear zone and found that the studied shear zone was affected by different types of hydrothermal solutions. Their average eU contents are 38, 29 and 21 ppm, whereas eTh averages 339, 156 and 115 ppm in ferruginated, kaolinized and silicified parts, respectively. Mineralogically, the high level of radioactivity in the shear zone is attributed to the presence of some radioactive minerals, in example plumbobetafite and uranophane as U-bearing minerals, thorite and uranothorite as Th-bearing minerals, zircon, fluorite, galena, mag- Fig. 1. Geological map of Gabal El-Sibai peralkaline granite (shear zone), Central Eastern Desert, Egypt (modified after Ali, 2001). netite and ilmenite as accessory minerals. In this paper we briefly report on the new mineralogical data obtained with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and mineral chemistry with EPMA of mineralizations of the El-Sibai altered granites (shear zone). Analytical methods Six mineralized samples of the El-Sibai altered peralkaline granites (shear zone) were investigated in details regarding mineralogy and mineral chemistry. Polished thin sections were investigated in reflected and transmitted light in order to determine mineral association and para-geneses. Backscattered electron images (BSE) were obtained with the scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM 6400 SEM), equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) at the Microscopy and Microanalyses Facility, University of New Brunswick (UNB), Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. Mineral compositions were determined on the JEOL JXA-733 Superprobe (EPMA); operating conditions were 15 kV, with a beam current of 50 nA and the spectra acquisition time was 30 s. As mineral standards jadeite, kaersutite, quartz, and apatite (for Na, Al, Si, P, and Ca, respectively), SrTiO3 (for Ti), CaF2 (for F), Fe, Nb, Hf, Ta, Sn, Th, and U metals (for Fe, Nb, Hf, Ta, Sn, Th, and U, respectively), YAG (for Y), cubic zirconia (for Zr), La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Pr, Er, Gd, Eu, Tb, Dy, and Yb; Al, Si glass (for La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Pr, Er, Gd, Eu, Tb, Dy, and Yb), and crocoite (for Pb) were used. Geological setting Field geology Metavolcanics and metasediments are the oldest rock units in the El-Sibai area of granitic rocks. These rocks are intruded by a granitic intrusion of Fig. 2. Sketch of the different types of altered granites in El-Sibai shear zone, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Gabal El-Sibai and Gabal Abu El-Tiyur. Younger granites of El-Sibai and Abu-Tiyur plutons are intruded in the metasediments, metavolcanics and several xenoliths from these older rocks of different sizes and shapes. They are pink in color and characterized by exfoliation and cavernous weathering. These granites are characterized by the presence of pegmatite pockets composed of feldspars, quartz and mica. All rock units are dissected by numerous mafic (basalt and dolerite) and alkaline bostonite dykes, which mainly follow the NW-SE direction. A NNE-SSW and N-S sets of faults cut the granitic pluton. These faults are mainly of strike-slip type (sinistral) and vary in length from 1.5 to 4 km. A shear zone trending NNE-SSW dissects the northern segment of Gabal El-Sibai (1484 m.a.s.l) and extends for 3 km. The granite becomes my-lonitized and cataclased within the shear zone. The identification of this shear zone was based on landsat images and field observations. The intensely exposed mineralized part of the shear zone varies in width from 0.5 to 3 m and in length from 300 to 500 m and is encountered at the alkali feldspar granite (Fig. 2). Ferrugination, silicification and kaolinitiza-tion with few dark patches of manganese den-drites are the main wall rock alteration features observed within the investigated shear zone. These alterations are more pronounced in the granitic rocks on both sides of the shear zone (Fig. 3a). Deep reddish brown color mostly characterizes the strongly ferruginated rocks, while the lighter creamy and brownish yellow tones could be attributed to the weathering of feldspars by kaolinitization process. The silici-fied granite is characterized by its hardness and lighter rosy tones. Sheared and altered zones are suitable for circulating hydrothermal solutions and present favourable sites for the rare-metal mineralizations. Petrography Fresh surfaces of El-Sibai peralkaline granites are medium-to coarse-grained and consist essentially of perthites, quartz, oligoclase, microcline, biotite, minor amount of alkali amphiboles and alkali pyroxenes. Zircon, fiuorite, apatite, mona-zite, allanite and hematite are the main accessory minerals. They are usually of hypidiomor-phic granular texture. The microcline perthites may dominate strongly over orthoclase perthites. Quartz occurs as anhedral crystals. A graphic texture has been observed in few samples, i.e quartz intergrowth with K-feldspar. Plagioclase occurs as albite and is less abundant than perthites. It occurs as small interstitial crystals between quartz, perthites and riebeckite. Alkali pyroxene occurs as aegirin and is characterized by the presence of zircon, fiuorite, apatite, allanite and monazite, which appear as inclusions. Alkali amphiboles occur as riebeckite and arfvedsonite, showing weak pleochroism from blue to deep blue. All constituents of altered granites from the shear zone show cataclastic effects and have corroded edges. Quartz (30-45 %) sometimes shows clear signs of mylonitization and annealing. Brec-ciation took place prior to and/or is contemporaneous with the hydrothermal solutions. K-feld-spars are represented by string type perthite with subordinate microcline. They are penetrated by relatively fine-grained veinlets of quartz and are kaolinized along the cleavage planes and fractures (Fig. 3 b, c). The cracks are filled with iron oxides which are originated from the hydrothermal solutions (Fig. 3 d). Cataclased albite (10 %) is commonly altered to sericite and its abundance increases in the mineralized samples. Cataclasis produced microfaults in the crystals and bending of the twin lamellae. Iron oxides are observed within all investigated thin sections either as a primary phase or as a secondary phase resulting from the alteration of other primary minerals, which are completely replaced by hematite (Fig. 3 e, f). Sometimes the original composition of the granites is obscured and becomes difficult to be determined due to the high intensity of ferrugina-tion. Thorite appears in two forms; in euhedral to subhedral crystals, and as long acicular ra- diating aggregates associated with iron oxide and zircon (Fig. 3 d), displaying bright yellow and blue interference colours. Accessory minerals are mainly metamictic zircon, monazite, rutile, fluorite, xenotime and opaque minerals. Zircon is in an optical microscope light gray and surrounded by hematite (Fig. 4 a, b), while the thorite occurs as lighter gray long acicular Fig. 3. a) NNE trending of peralkaline granite in El-Sibai shear zone, b) Average mineral composition of cataclastic and mylonite rocks within the El-Sibai shear zone, parallel nicoles and c) crossed nicols, d) Photomicrograph of large crystals of zircon associated with irone oxides (hematite) within the El-Sibai shear zone, e) Photomicrograph of mineralized veinlets of thorite associated with hematite, and f) its corresponding BSE image. Fig. 4. a) Photomicrograph of zircon and thorite, polarized light b) The same as previous photograph under crossed nicols, c) Photomicrograph of large zircon crystals surrounded by thorite minerals in parallel nicols, and d) under crossed nicols. radiating aggregates associated with hematite and display reddish brown, yellowish brown and dark brown interference colours (Fig. 4 c, d). Mineralogy Detailed mineralogical investigated of colum-bite-tantalite, Th- and U-Nb, zircon and Th-rich zircon minerals in the mineralized peralkaline granites of El-Sibai shear zone, revealed the presence of primary Th (thorite, huttonite monazite and Th-rich zircon), and U-Nb (plumbopyrochlo-re), zirconolite (Nb-Zr), zircon (Hf), monazite, fluorite, and fluorapatite. Optical microscopy, SEM, and EPMA were used to characterize ferrocolum-bite, pyrochlore and plumbopyrochlore, primary Th (thorite, and huttonite), zirconolite (mixture of zircon and columbite), zircon (Hf), Th-rich zircon, monazite, fluorite, fluorapatite, and cerite-(Ce). A brief description of accessory heavy minerals in this study of rare-metal peralkaline granites are as follows: Columbite group AB2O6 The Columbite group of minerals comprises a large number of structurally related orthorhom-bic AB206 coumpounds. The Columbite subgroup is Nb-clominant, and the Ta- subgroup Ta dominant. Most commonly occurring as accessory minerals in granite pegmatites (Gaines et al., 1997), columbite-group minerals contain U (and Th) in various amounts and are commonly metamict, but there is no description with U as an essential constituent. The relatively small octahedral A site is commonly occupied by Mg2+ (magnesiocolumbite) and transition-metal cations, such as Fe2+ (ferro-columbite) and Mn2+ (manganocolumbite), U and Th substitutions are relatively rare. Nb and Ta form mostly complex oxides or hydroxides, they appear rarely as silicates in different rock types. This series represents solid solution between columbite (Fe, Mn)(Nb,Ta)2O6 and tanta-lite (Fe, Mn)(Ta,Nb)2O6. In fact, similarity between Nb and Ta elements, t)oth being pentavalent, preferring octahedral coordination in oxide compounds with similar ionic radii=0.72 Ä (Whittaker & MuNTus, 1970), cause extensive mutual substitution between them. The columbite-tantalite series are the most abundant in granites and pegmatites, particularly those containing albite and Li silicates associated with albite, microcline, lepidolite, and muscovite. Columbite is frequently considered to be a carrier of U-Th and REE. In many cases, its radioactivity is related to minute inclusions of radioactive minerals, surrounded by conspicuous radioactive halos. A large number of complex Nb, Ta, and Ti oxides are known to contain U in various amounts. These minerals mostly occur as accessory minerals in granitic rocks and granitic pegmatites. There are several important Nb and Ta ore minerals, which may be mined for REEs. A few of them contain U as an essential constituent, which is usually oxidied to a certain degree (Smith, 1984). Nearly all contain some U and Th in solid solution, and are therefore important actinide hosts in granitic rocks, as well as important source for dissolved U in the hydrothermal and meteoric waters with which they interact. Many of these minerals are commonly metamict; due to their abilities to incorporate radioactive elements, they can also be strongly altered. Metamict minerals offer a special challenge to mineralogists trying to obtain structural information about their crystalline precursors. Redox conditions during annealing may change oxidation states of some elements (e.g. Fe or U). Due to possible post-formation alteration, it is not al- Fig. 5. a) pyrochlore and plumbopyrochlore associated with thorite and zircon in the El-Sibai shear zone, BSE image b) Thorite associated with euhedral crystals of zircon, BSE image c) large euhedral thorite with hematite, BSE image d) large crystal of zirconolite, and BSE image e) photomicrograph of violet fluorite with cerite inclusions, polarized light and f) its corresponding BSE image for the same crystal. ways clear what was the oxidation state of some elements at the time of crystallization (Warner & EwiNG, 1993). According to their structure these minerals are divided into ixiolite, samarskite (wolframite) and columbite groups. They consist of approximately hexagonal close packed O atoms. The A and B sites are octahedrally coordinated. Octahedra share edges to form chains along [001] and layers parallel to [100] (notation after Warner & Ewing, 1993). All three groups have structures that derivates of the a-PbO2 structure (Warner & Ewing, 1993). The structures of pyro-chlore and zirconolite share some basic features with those of fergusonite and aeschynite, namely octahedral chains and large A sites; however, the pyrochlore structure is a derivative of the CaF2 structure (Chakoumakos, 1984) and zirconolite is a derivative of the pyrochlore structure (Bayliss et al., 1989). The most important U-bearing Nb-Ta-Ti oxides are discussed further below. Ferrocolumbite [(Fe, Mn)(Nb,Ta)2O6] crystals that occur in the El-Sibai shear zone ar^ generally dark grey to black when observed in the microscope. They are present in the form of subhedral to anhedral crystals and range in size from 30 to 100 pm (Fig. 5a, b). The EPMA of the minerals revealed that the major elements in ferrocolumbite at A sites are FeO (16.52 wt%) and MnO (4.57 wt%), and at B sites Nb2O5 (74.68 wt%), and Ta2O5 (2.61 wt%). Also, minor simounts of Ti, Th, U, Y5 and LREE were reported as substitutions in ferrocolumbite (Fig. 5a, Table 1). Pyrochlore group [A1-2 B2 O6 (O,OH,F)] This group is particularly important group with Nb-Ta-Ti oxides that contain substantial U. The structure of ideal pyrochlore group, is a derivative of the fluorite structure (Chakoumakos, 1984, 1986). The structure with Ta, Nd, and Ti, and which can also contain Fe, Sn, W, and Sb (Mandarino, 1999); Sbl+ can even dominate at the B site, as in the case of romeite (Brugger et al., 1997). The A site is eight coordinated (distorted cube) and may contain alkalis, alkaline earths, REE and actinides. In pyrochlore charge balance is maintained through cation substitutions at either A or B sites as well as throught anionic substitutions. Three pyrochlore subgroups are distinguished in accordance with the predominant cation in the B sites. Niobium prevail over Ta in the pyrochlore subgroup, whereas Ta exceeds Nb in the micro-lite subgroup. Both pyrochlore and microlite subgroups have (Ta+Nb)>2Ti, whereas the betafite subgroup is characterized by 2Ti>(Ta+Nb). U substitutions at the A sites and metamict pyrochlore are common. Although virtually all these minerals contains some U, only uranmicrolite and urano-pyrochlore of pyrochlore group contain U as an essential constituent (Lumpkin & Ewing, 1995). Pyrochlore [(Fe, Mn)( Nb, Ta, Ti)2O6(O,OH,F] occurs as subhedral to anhedral crystals in the El-Sibai altered peralkaine granites, and range in size from 5 to 10 pm (Fig. 5a, b). Its radioactivity is related to minute inclusions of radioactive min- erals. The EPMA of the crystals showed that the major elements in pyrochlore are FeO (15.89 wt%) and MnO (4.57 wt%) at A sites, and Nb2Ol (65.94 wt%), Ta2Ol (3.2 wt%) and TiO2 at B sites. A.lso minor amounts of U, Th, Y, and LREE were reported as substitutions in pyrochlore (Fig. 5a,b, Table 1). Plumbopyrochlore [(Pb,U,Ca)2-xNb2O6(OH)] was found only in the El-Sibai shear zone as an alteration phase, containing potential concentrations of the high-field-strength elements (HFSE), such as Ti, Nb, and Ta, besides U. The EPMA of the sample MA226ES10-C5 revealed that the major elements in plumbopyrochlore are at A sites PbO (30.57 wt%), UO2 (7.26 wt%), FeO (11.93 wt%), CaO (1.7 wt%) and MnO (0.26 wt%), and at B sites Nb2Ol (31.65 wt%), TiO2 (5.81 %) and Ta2Ol (2.50 wt%), (Fig. 5 a, b; Table ^). Zirconolite group (A2 B2 O7) The structure of zirconolite [(Ca,Fe)(Zr,U) Ti2O7] can be described as a derivative of the py-ro2ch7lore structure, with octahedrally coordinated B sites and A sites in distorted cubes. Zirconolite is monoclinic and has two distinct A sites, designated as A (Ca) and A' (Zr). Zirconolite is Ti dominant at the B site, Nb- dominant zirconolite minerals were identified from carbonatite in Kovdor (Williams & Giere, 1996); however, no Ta- dominant zirconolite-group minerals are known. As for most other Ta-Nb-Ti oxides, U substitutes at the large cation sites primarily for Ca at the A site in zirconolite; no U dominant zirconolite-group minerals are known. Nevertheless, U and Th substitutions in zirconolite can induce substantial structural change, consequently the metamict zir-conolite are not rare. As an important accessory mineral in large variety of rocks, zirconolite has also been studied as a potential actinide-bearing nuclear waste form (Lumpkin et al., 1994). It is as an alteration phase between columbite and zircon with size range from 20 to 50 pm (Fig. 5d). The EPMA of the sample MA226E8-C8 reflect the major elements in zirconolite are at A sites ZrO2 (26.25 wt%), SiO2 (18.97 wt%), FeO (13.21 wt%), and CaO (1.01 w1;%), and at B sites Nb2Ol (10.99 wt%), TiO2 (3.94 wt%), UO2 (1.1 wt%), ^;h02 (8.79 wt%), Y2O3 (6.48 wt%), and Ta2Ol (0.2 wt%). Also small amounts of LREE (1.2 w;t%o) were reported as substitutions at B sites of zirconolite (Fig. 5d, Table 1). Thorium mineralizations In the El-Sibai altered granites (shear zone) two mineral species of Th-minerals, namely thorite and huttonite monazite are found. Under reducing conditions, U transport is likely to be measured in fractions of a centimeter, although F and Cl complexes can stabilize U (IV) within the solution (Keppler & Wyllie, 1990). If there is sufficient concentration of oxygen to stabilize the uranyl ion, UO2+ and its complexes, U can migrate many kilometers from its source to precipitate U-bearing minerals (plumbopyrochlore and zirconolite). Fig. 6. SEM-BSE images a) huttonite after monazite, and b) fluorapatite cystals associated with zircon and titanite. Thorite [Th,U(SiO4)] exihibits euhedral to sub-hedral crystals in the El-Sibai altered peralkaline granites of the investigated area. Thorite is black to brown and shows varying degrees of alteration. It somewhat resembles zircon, occurring as small, square prismatic crystals with pyramidal points and has been found around the zircon crystals as yellowish brown phases (Fig. 5b, c). The chemical composition of thorite is given in Table 2. ThO2 ranges from 68.13 to 78.64 wt% (mean 73.48 wt%), UO2 ranges from 0.838 to 1.54 wt% (mean 1.07 wt%), SiO2 ranges from 12.97 to 14.38 wt% (mean 13.71 wt%), Y2O3 (3.45 wt%), and FeO (3.22 wt%). Small amounts of Ca, P and LREE were reported as substitutions in thorite (Fig. 5b, c; Table 2). Huttonite monazite [(Th,U,LREE)PO4] occurs as as an alteration phase between thorite and monazite, and range in size from 30 to 100 pm (Fig. 5d). The EMPA of these crystals reflect the huttonite composition (Table 2). These results indicate that the mean values of major elements in huttonite monazite are ThO2 (61.06 wt%), P2O5 (12.90 wt%), Al2O3 (1.11 wt%), CaO (4.75 wt%), Ce2O3 (11.80 wt%), Y2O3 (1.29 wt%), and U (0.7 wt%o). Very small amounts of Si and LREE were reported as substitutions in huttonite (Fig. 6a, Table 2). According to Frondel and cuttito (1955) huttonite and thorite are formed at hydrothermal conditions over a temperature range 300 °C to 700 °C. The formation of huttonite is favoured by alkaline conditions and thorite by acid conditions. Accessory minerals Accessory minerals include zircon, fluorite, monazite, and cerite-(Ce); among sulfides and hydroxides pyrite and hematite prevail. Zircon (ZrSiO4) is a common accessory mineral in plutonic igneous rocks. It is generally found as small inclusions in minerals, however in granites and pegmatites it can form large well developed crystals (Deer et al., 1966). Hussein (1978) and Abadalla et al. (2008) stated that the radioactive zircons are usually zoned and are characterized by metamictization. The explanation for the origin of the "metamict state" is that the internal order of the originally crystalline form has been destroyed by «-particles bombardment from radionuclides within the structure. It is partially or completely modified giving amorphous zircon a more isotro-pic character; i.e, metamict zircon. Zircon crystals in the studied mineralized granites are mainly characterized by considerable metamictization due to thorium and uranium inclusions. Zircon occurs as pale to deep brown euhedral prismatic grains and is generally sub-translucent to opaque with dull luster. The most common habit is the bipyramidal form with various pyramidal faces (Fig. 4a, b). However, some zircon crystals are characterized by extremely short prisms and are more or less equidimensional, exhibiting square cross section. Zircon occurs as euhedral to subhedral prismatic (six-or eight-sided), 20 to 150 pm zoned crystals, which contain clusters of inclusions of radioactive minerals. The core of zircon in the El-Sibai shear zone contains high Hf contents, in contract to the rim with low Hf contents (Table 3). Both varieties of zircon, unaltered and altered zircon (Th-rich zircon), have been recognized in the El-Sibai altered granites (shear zone). The chemical composition of zircon is presented in Table 3. Th-rich zircon has higher ThO2 and UO2, and lower ZrO2 and SiO2, in compari^ son to unaltered zircon. Generally, domains of altered zircon (Th-rich zircon) are characterized by greater enrichment in CaO, FeO, P2O5, HfO2 and Al2O3 than unaltered domains (Fig. 5b, Table 4). Similar results were observed by Förster (2000, 2006) and Abd El-Naby (2009), who reported on Minerals of study ZrOa Th-rich Zircon from Pudlesi granite Czech Republic (Breiter et al.^006) Zircon from Pudlesi granite Czech Republic (Breiter et al.^006) Thorite from Erzgebirge granite (Förster, 2006) Th-rich Zircon from Um Ara granite, Egypt (Abd El-Naby, 2009) Zircon from Um Ara granite, Egypt (Abd El-Naby, 2009)) Thorite from Um Ara granite, Egypt (Abd El-Naby, 2009) V V V V V V V V V \ Th02 50% Zircon Th-rich Zircon Zircon-rich Th Thorite Fig. 7. Composition of thorite and zircon plotted on the basis of SiO2-ThO2-ZrO2. The shaded field encloses the composition of thorite-zircon solid solution. See also Breiter et al. 2006, Froster et al., 2006, and Abd El-Naby, 2009. Fig. 8. ZrO2 versus HfO2 diagram of zircons from rare metal granitoids, Eastern Desert, Egypt. The shown trends are modified from Kempe et al. (1997) and Abadalla et al. (2008). The granite box, comprising Zr-Hf ranges in granites from WedePOHL (1978). Fig. 9. Zr-Hf-(Y+ U+ Th +HREE) ternary diagram for zircon compositions in rare metal granitoids, Eastern Desert, Egypt, the dashed line represents an interpretative boundary that limits the compositional gap between the two zircon series. The shown trends of magmatic zircon (MZ) and metasomatic hydrothermal zircon (MHZ) are drawn by Abadalla et al. (2008). Table 1. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rock El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai Sample MA226 ES10-C1 MA226 ES10-C2 MA226 ES10-C3 MA226 ES6-C4 MA226 ES10-C5 MA226 ES10-C6 MA226 ES10-C7 MA226 ES8-C8 Mineral name Ferro-columbite Ferro-columbite Pyrochlore Pyrochlore Plumbo-pyrochlore Plumbo-pyrochlore Zirconolite Zirconolite SiO2 0.110 0.109 1.119 1.190 3.15 4.65 18.13 18.97 Na2O 0.033 0.033 0.143 0.152 1.333 1.228 0.090 0.104 K2O 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.033 0.030 0.000 0.000 ZrO2 0.000 0.000 0.245 0.286 0.216 0.198 25.28 26.25 HfO2 0.041 0.041 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.000 1.198 1.385 P2O5 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.032 0.086 0.079 0.281 0.325 CaO 0.047 0.046 2.106 2.240 1.705 1.570 0.047 1.013 FeO 16.52 16.38 14.91 15.89 11.93 10.98 12.28 13.21 TiO2 1.511 1.498 5.95 6.34 5.81 5.35 3.41 3.94 MnO 4.57 4.53 1.093 1.165 0.289 0.266 0.104 0.120 Y2O3 0.329 0.326 0.852 0.908 0.287 0.264 5.60 6.48 Ce2O3 0.000 0.000 0.099 0.106 0.756 0.696 0.760 0.879 La2O3 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.219 0.201 0.137 0.159 Pr2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.033 0.093 0.108 Nd2O3 0.074 0.073 0.000 0.000 0.042 0.038 0.069 0.079 Gd2O3 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.064 0.190 0.175 0.000 0.000 SnO2 0.114 0.113 0.245 0.261 0.028 0.026 0.000 0.000 Nb2O>5 74.68 74.03 61.87 65.94 31.65 29.14 9.50 10.99 Ta2O5 2.613 2.591 2.999 3.20 2.503 2.384 0.172 0.199 PbO 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 30.57 28.14 0.000 0.000 ThO2 0.085 0.084 1.399 1.480 1.027 0.946 7.60 8.79 UO2 0.111 0.110 0.688 0.733 7.26 6.68 0.868 1.104 Total 100.87 99.96 93.81 99.98 99.11 93.07 86.45 94.10 Structural formula for 4 oxygen atoms Si 0.003 0.003 0.035 0.037 0.158 0.145 0.567 0.655 Na 0.001 0.001 0.005 0.005 0.042 0.038 0.003 0.003 K 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 Zr 0.000 0.000 0.008 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.790 0.914 Hf 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.016 0.019 P 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.007 0.008 Ca 0.001 0.001 0.059 0.062 0.047 0.044 0.001 0.028 Fe 0.516 0.512 0.466 0.497 0.373 0.343 0.384 0.444 Ti 0.047 0.047 0.186 0.198 0.182 0.167 0.107 0.123 Mn 0.143 0.142 0.034 0.036 0.009 0.008 0.003 0.004 Y 0.007 0.007 0.018 0.019 0.006 0.006 0.117 0.135 Ce 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.002 0.016 0.015 0.016 0.018 La 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.003 Pr 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 Nd 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 Sn 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 Nb 1.167 1.157 0.967 1.030 0.495 0.455 0.148 0.172 Ta 0.025 0.025 0.029 0.031 0.014 0.013 0.002 0.002 Th 0.003 0.028 0.046 0.049 0.034 0.031 0.249 0.288 U 0.004 0.003 0.022 0.035 0.227 0.209 0.027 0.035 Nb / Ta 28.58 28.58 20.66 20.61 21.10 21.06 55.10 55.12 Th / U 0.76 0.76 2.03 1.34 0.14 0.14 8.76 7.96 chemical analyses of zircon, thorite, and Th-rich zircon (Fig. 7). Despite the incorporation of some oxides (e.g. CaO, FeO, P2O5, HfO2 and Al2O3) and a hydrous component, the majority of domains of both zircon varieties maintain a constant SiO2/ ZrO2 ratio (Table 4). 2 The EMPA for these crystals reflect the zircon composition (Table 3). This indicates that the major elements in zircon are ZrO2 (60.44 wt%), SiO2 (31.94 wt%), HfO2 (2.94 %), and Yb2O3 (0.5 wt%) with significant amounts of ThO2 (0.36 wt%), UO2 (0.16 wt%), FeO (0.82 wt%), and Y2O3 (0.4 wt%). In contrast, the EPMA of the Th-ricli zircon showed in average mainly ZrO2 (53.47 wt%), SiO2 (29.55 wt%), HfO2 (3.34 wt%), and Yb2O3 (0.56 wt%) with significant amounts of ThO2 (5.46 wt%), UO2 (0.55 wt%), FeO (0.85 wt%), and Y2O3 (2.16 wt%) composed of Th-rich zircon (Table 4). Petrogenesis of zircon Kempe et al. (1997) and Abadalla et al. (2008) considered that both magmatic and metasomatic mechanisms or their combination were responsible for yielding extreme Zr/Hf fractionation and hence the formation of Hf-rich zircon. The aforementioned petrographical and geochemical characterization of metasomatically and magmatically specialized rare metal granitoids, has greatly contributed to clear discrimination of Zr/Hf fractionation in the two main associations (i.e. magmatic & metasomatic). The zircon of the investigated rare metal El-Sibai altered granite frequently contains hafnium in amounts ranging between 2.14 and 4.23 wt%, therefore the nomenclature scheme of cor-reia Neves et al. (1974) for the isomorphous zircon (ZrSiO4)-Hafnon (HfSiO4) series has been used to desiggnate it. The term #Hf denotes the hafnon end-member (HfSiO4) mole% or more precisely, the atomic ratio: 100*Hf/(Zr + Hf) (Table 3). Zircon has #Hf = 0-10; hafnian zircon #Hf = 10-50; zirconian hafnon #Hf = 50-90 and Hafnon #Hf = 90-100. However, in the present study zircon with enhanced Hf content (i.e. #Hf = 3-10) was designated as Hf-rich zircon in order to distinguish it from zircon with very low #Hf. Zircon of El-Sibai per-alkaline granite is characterized by a primitive composition with respect to the content of Hf, Y, U, Th, and HREE (Figs. 8, 9; Table 3). Its ranging between 3.54 and 6.44 and thus, it can be designated as a normal zircon according to the scheme Table 2. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rocks El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai Sample MA226 ES10-S1 MA226 ES10-S2 MA226 ES5-S3 MA226 ES6-S4 MA226 ES3-S5 Average N=5 MA226 ES3-S6 MA226 ES3-S7 Average N=2 Minerals Thorite Thorite Thorite Thorite Thorite Huttonite monazite Huttonite monazite Al2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.116 1.103 1.11 SiO2 14.38 14.06 13.86 13.29 12.97 13.71 0.357 0.365 0.361 Na2O 0.101 0.084 0.016 0.079 0.015 0.059 0.000 0.000 0.000 K2O 0.113 0.048 0.000 0.045 0.000 0.069 0.000 0.000 0.000 ZrO2 0.567 1.178 0.206 1.114 0.193 0.652 0.077 0.079 0.078 HfO2 0.032 0.083 0.000 0.078 0.000 0.064 0.169 0.173 0.171 P2O5 0.201 0.269 0.254 0.254 0.238 0.243 12.74 13.05 12.90 CaO 0.328 0.260 0.742 0.245 0.694 0.454 4.69 4.80 4.75 FeO 1.062 0.350 7.43 0.330 6.95 3.22 1.01 0.985 0.998 MnO 0.077 0.026 0.009 0.024 0.009 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000 Y2O3 3.38 3.63 3.51 3.43 3.29 3.45 1.289 1.296 1.293 Ce2O3 0.036 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.036 11.10 12.5 11.80 Pr2O3 0.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.145 0.000 0.000 0.000 La2O3 0.033 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.033 0.000 0.000 0.000 Nd2O3 0.066 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.066 1.595 1.634 1.615 Eu2O 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.231 0.236 0.234 Gd2O3 .1500 0.075 0.000 0.071 0.000 0.076 0.907 0.929 0.918 Dy2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.24 0.246 0.245 HO2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.133 0.137 0.135 Er2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.240 0.245 Yb2O3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.023 0.023 Nb2O5 0.346 0.405 0.069 0.383 0.064 0.253 0.000 0.000 0.000 Ta2O5 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.000 Table 2. (continued) PbO 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.111 0.114 0.112 ThO2 73.49 78.64 72.81 74.32 68.13 73.48 60.69 61.43 61.06 UO2 1.543 0.886 1.086 0.838 1.016 1.074 0.693 0.710 0.702 Total 96.09 99.98 100.01 94.51 93.57 96.83 98.60 99.95 99.28 Structural formula on basis of 4 oxygen atoms Al 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.023 0.023 0.023 Si 0.444 0.434 0.428 0.410 0.400 0.420 0.011 0.011 0.011 Na 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 K 0.003 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 Zr 0.018 0.037 0.006 0.035 0.006 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.001 Hf 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 P 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.319 0.326 0.323 Ca 0.009 0.007 0.021 0.007 0.012 0.013 0.130 0.133 0.131 Fe 0.030 0.010 0.206 0.009 0.193 0.090 0.032 0.031 0.032 Mn 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 Y 0.099 0.106 0.103 0.101 0.096 0.101 0.027 0.027 0.027 Ce 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.232 0.260 0246 Pr 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 La 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 Nd 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.033 0.034 0.034 Eu 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.005 0.005 Gd 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.019 0.019 0.019 Dy 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.005 0.005 Ho 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.003 Er 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 0.005 0.005 Yb 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 Nb 0.005 0.006 0.001 0.006 0.001 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 Pb 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 Th 1.341 1.435 1.329 1.356 1.243 1.34 1.108 1.121 1.115 U 0.026 0.015 0.019 0.014 0.017 0.018 0.012 0.12 0.012 Th / U 47.62 88.72 67.05 88.71 67.05 71.83 92.33 93.42 92.88 ZA+B 2.0 2.07 2.11 1.96 1.98 2.02 1.98 2.01 2.00 N= number of samples of CoRREiA Neves et al. (1974). Zircon of the studied altered peralkaline granite zone is characterized by UO2 and ThO2 occur in high quantities in HREE (Figs. 8, 9; Tsible 3). Meanwhile Th-rich zircons of the hematitized and albitized granites are characterized by complex chemistry which is reflected in high to enhanced contents of Hf, U, Th, Y, HREE (Figs. 8, 9; Table 3) and therefore this zircon can be designated as Hf-rich zircon. The zoning terminology used here is based on the geo-chemical criteria given by Černy et al. (1985) for fractionated rare metal granitoids and pegmatites. Fluorite CaF2 Fluorite showed large blue to violet euhedral to subhedral crystals with a size range of 10-40 pm (Fig. 5e, f). The EPMA indicate that the major elements in fluorite are CaO (68.75 wt%) and F (45.83 wt%), with significant amounts of Ce2O3 (0.7 wt%), Y203 (2.7 wt%), UO2 (0.02 wt%), ThO2 (0.2 wt%) and REE (2 wt%) are reported as substitutions in fluorite (Table 5). Yttrium partially substitutes Ca. El-Kammar et al. (1997) concluded that the change in colour of fluorite is mainly controlled by the Y content. The presence of fluorite accompanying the mineralization indicates that the hydrothermal alteration processes were involved during shearing. Cerite-(Ce) [Ce9 (Th, Ca) (Fe3+, Mg) (SiO4)6[SiO3(OH)](OH)3] The nomenclature of the REE minerals is unique, because names of simple end-members no longer exist. Since 1966 each mineral name consists of a structural formula name and the symbol of the dominant lanthanide element (Fleischer, 1987, 1989; Bayliss & Levinson, 1988). The crystal structures of many REE minerals are poorly- Table 3. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rock El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai Sample Zircon Core MA226-E10 Z1 Zircon Rim MA226-E10 Z2 Zircon Core MA226-ES3 Z3 Zircon rim MA226-ES3 Z4 Zircon core FEL-2E4 Z5 Zircon rim FEL-2E4 Z6 Average N=6 Al^Gj 0.000 0.026 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.056 SiO2 32.74 33.05 32.82 32.62 30.42 30.00 31.94 ZrG2 61.34 61.05 61.45 61.59 59.15 58.05 60.44 HfG2 4.24 3.42 4.23 3.14 2.476 2.135 2.94 P2G5 0.128 0.009 0.040 0.087 0.694 0.569 0.254 CaO 0.007 0.000 0.016 0.011 0.069 0.178 0.056 FeO 0.187 0.430 0.878 1.366 0.172 1.891 0.821 MnO 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.066 0.044 Y2G3 0.120 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.639 0.835 0.40 Ce^Oj 0.027 0.089 0.000 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.048 Yb2G3 0.205 0.139 0.037 0.160 1.297 1.157 0.499 PbG 0.016 0.047 0.000 0.048 0.000 0.069 0.045 ThG2 0.400 0.165 0.127 0.076 0.934 0.444 0.358 UG2 0.187 0.000 0.057 0.117 0.149 0.172 0.155 Total 99.60 98.47 99.66 99.25 96.01 95.65 98.11 Structural formula for 4 oxygen atoms Al 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.001 Si 1.011 1.020 1.013 1.007 0.939 0.926 0.986 Zr 0.921 0.917 0.923 0.925 0.924 0.907 0.920 Hf 0.032 0.040 0.040 0.030 0.034 0.029 0.034 P 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.017 0.014 0.006 Ca 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.002 Fe 0.005 0.011 0.022 0.034 0.005 0.059 0.023 Mn 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.002 Y 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.013 0.017 0.011 Ce 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 Yb 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.027 0.024 0.010 Pb 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 Th 0.013 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.017 0.008 0.008 U 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.002 ZA+B 2.0 2.0 2.05 2.01 1.98 1.98 2.0 Hf / Zr 17.94 14.40 14.53 19.61 23.89 27.19 19.59 U / Th 2.14 0.00 2.23 0.65 6.27 2.58 2.77 #Hf 5.28 3.54 6.44 4.85 4.02 3.56 4.62 #Hf = 100*Hf/(Zr+Hf) N= number of samples known; because the phases in nature are metamict (Th and U commonly substitute for REE in minerals, as mentioned above). The smaller or Y-group (heavy) REE exhibit irregular coordination numbers with coordination number from 6 to 9, most commonly 8, whereas the larger or Ce-group (light) REE exhibit larger coordination numbers from 7 to 12, most commonly 9 (Miyawaki & Nakai, 1987). The trivalent Ce-group REE are structurally very similar to the Ca2+, therefore they commonly substitute Ca in rock-forming minerals. Substi- tution of a trivalent REE cation for divalent Ca requires a charge compensating mechanism, i.e., a coupled substitution can be represented by the operators EuCa-1(for Eu2+; add one Eu, remove one Ca or exchange Eu for a Ca), YCe-1, and CeTh- 1 (for Ce4+). The light rare earths (ca-l1led cerium-- 1group or LREE) have relatively large ionic radii similar to that of Ca2+ and Th4+, in contrast to the heavy rare earths (plus Y and Mn2+). All of the REE commonly substitute each other in minerals. LREE tend to be concentrated in highly fractionated basic rocks such as carbonatites (Förster, Table 4. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rock El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai El Sibai Sample Th-rich zircon Core MA226-E10 Z7 Th-rich zircon Rim MA226-E10 Z8 Th-rich zircon Core MA226-ES6 Z9 Th-rich zircon Rim MA226-ES6 Z10 Average N=4 Al203 0.462 0.807 0.477 0.849 0.649 Si02 30.03 28.85 29.98 29.33 29.55 Zr02 58.07 51.60 52.91 51.20 53.47 Hf02 3.18 2.63 4.28 2.77 3.34 P205 0.131 0.158 0.136 0.166 0.148 CaO 0.188 0.567 0.194 0.596 0.386 FeO 0.589 1.058 0.618 1.113 0.845 MnO 0.000 0.138 0.000 0.146 0.142 Ti02 0.000 0.030 0.000 0.032 0.031 Y203 1.070 2.662 2.114 2,799 2.16 Ce^Oj 0.099 0.228 0.102 0.240 0.167 Yb203 0.429 0.672 0.442 0.706 0.562 PbO 0.021 0.015 0.028 0.026 0.023 Th02 2.30 4.97 6.37 8.20 5.46 U02 0.362 0.710 0.374 0.746 0.548 Total 96.93 95.10 98.03 98.92 97.25 Structural formula for 4 oxygen atoms Al 0.010 0.017 0.015 0.027 0.017 Si 0.927 0.890 0.925 0.905 0.912 Zr 0.872 0.775 0.827 0.800 0.819 Hf 0.030 0.025 0.059 0.058 0.048 P 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 Ca 0.005 0.016 0.005 0.017 0.011 Fe 0.015 0.027 0.019 0.035 0.024 Mn 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.005 0.004 Ti 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 Y 0.022 0.056 0.044 0.058 0.045 Ce 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.005 0.004 Yb 0.009 0.014 0.009 0.015 0.012 Pb 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Th 0.075 0.163 0.116 0.150 0.126 U 0.004 0.007 0.006 0.013 0.008 ZA+B 2.0 2.0 2.03 2.09 2.03 Hf /Zr 18.26 19.60 12.36 18.48 17.18 U /Th 6.35 7.00 17.61 10.94 10.48 #Hf 5.98 4.85 7.48 5.13 5.86 #Hf = 100*Hf/(Zr+Hf) N= number of samples 2000), whereas HREE and especially Y tend to be concentrated in fractionated acid rocks in example alkaline granites and pegmatites. The EMPA for these crystals reflect the cerite composition. The EPMA indicate that the mean values of major elements in cerite are Ce2O3 (65.48 wt%), SiO2 (7.16 wt%), ThO2 (9.92 wt%), CaO (2.31 wt%), Y2 (2.13 wt%), Yb203 (1.31 wt%), Al2O3 (4.55 wt%), FeO (0.23 wt%), MgO (0.2 wt%), U02 (0.38 wt%) and F (2.46 wt%) with significant amounts of Sr, HREE, and Hf (Fig. 5f, Table 5). Fluorapatite Ca5 (PO4)3 F Under binocular microscope, apatite grains are mainly massive with well rounded to subrounded Table 5. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rocks El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai Sample MA226 ES10 MA226 ES10 MA226 ES5 MA226 ES6 Average N=4 MA226 ES3 MA226 ES3 MA226 ES3 MA226 ES3 Average N=4 Mineral name Flourite F1 Flourite F2 Flourite F3 Flourite F4 Cerite Ce1 Cerite Ce2 Cerite Ce3 Cerite Ce4 Al203 1.118 0.461 1.103 0.455 0.786 5.45 4.23 4.70 3.82 4.55 Si02 0.825 0.469 0.813 0.462 0.545 9.08 6.17 7.83 5.57 7.16 Na2O 0.941 0.472 0.928 0.466 0.702 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 F 45.21 47.06 44.60 46.43 45.83 2.979 2.300 2.569 2.008 2.464 CaO 67.64 70.80 66.72 69.85 68.75 2.383 2.528 2.055 2.283 2.31 P2O5 0.061 0.081 0.060 0.080 0.068 0.133 0.156 0.115 0.141 0.136 MgO 0.000 0.011 0.015 0.010 0.012 0.215 0.223 0.124 0.255 0.2 FeO 0.010 0.012 0.000 0.012 0.012 0.258 0.225 0.222 0.203 0.227 SrO 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.010 0.011 0.009 0.015 0.012 0.018 0.014 Y2O3 2.661 1.207 2.625 1.190 0.920 2.711 1.813 2.339 1.637 2.125 Ce2O3 0.730 0.000 0.720 0.138 0.435 67.02 66.60 67.81 60.16 65.48 La2O3 0.059 0.140 0.058 0.000 0.086 0.120 0.074 0.104 0.067 0.091 Pr2O3 0.028 0.071 0.028 0.000 0.042 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Nd2O3 0.124 0.000 0.122 0.070 0.105 0.661 0.573 0.570 0.587 0.580 Eu2O3 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.348 0.000 0.314 0.331 Gd2O3 0.100 0.000 0.099 0.000 0.099 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.10 Dy2O3 0.117 0.126 0.115 0.124 0.121 0.508 0.280 0.438 0.253 0.37 Er2O3 0.244 0.011 0.241 0.011 0.090 0.778 0.244 0.471 0.220 0.478 Yb2O3 0.350 0.000 0.346 0.000 0.348 1.663 1.126 1.434 1.017 1.310 HfO2 0.000 0.120 0.000 0.119 0.120 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.019 0.07 PbO 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.048 0.048 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ThO2 0.197 0.073 0.194 0.072 0.159 7.13 13.86 6.12 12.52 9.92 UO2 0.021 0.026 0.000 0.026 0.068 0.382 0.421 0.329 0.380 0.375 Total 101.51 101.36 99.99 100.01 100.72 99.98 100.0 96.24 90.33 96.64 Structural formula on basis of 4 oxygen atoms Si 0.026 0.025 0.025 0.014 0.017 0.284 0.193 0.244 0.172 0.223 Na 0.023 0.015 0.024 0.015 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Al 0.029 0.010 0.023 0.010 0.018 0.114 0.088 0.098 0.080 0.095 F ------ ----- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- Hf 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.001 P 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 Ca 1.88 1.97 1.853 1.940 1.91 0.070 0.070 0.057 0.063 0.033 Mg 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.007 0.007 0.004 0.008 0.006 Fe 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 Sr 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Y 0.055 0.025 0.077 0.035 0.048 0.057 0.038 0.069 0.048 0.051 Ce 0.015 0.004 0.021 0.004 0.011 1.40 1.39 1.986 1.762 1.63 La 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Pr 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 Dy 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.011 0.006 0.020 0.007 0.009 Nd 0.003 0.000 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.014 0.012 0.017 0.015 0.015 Eu 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.009 0.008 Gd 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Er 0.005 0.001 0.007 0.004 0.004 0.016 0.005 0.020 0.007 0.012 Table 5. (continued) Yb 0.007 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.009 0.035 0.023 0.042 0.030 0.032 Pb 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Th 0.004 0.003 0.006 0.002 0.004 0.130 0.253 0.112 0.228 0.181 U 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 Th/U 9.38 2.81 0.000 2.81 5.00 18.66 32.92 18.66 32.90 25.86 -----not calculated N= number of samples shapes. The color of apatite grains generally varies from pale yellow to dark brown. The EPMA (Fig. 6a, b) reflects the chemical composition of apatite associated with minor amount of uranium (1.63 wt%) and manganese. Uranium usually substitutes for Ca in fluorapatite. According to Deer et al. (1966, 1992) the intensity of the color in fluor-apatite increases with increasing Mn content. The EMPA for these crystals reflect the zircon composition (Fig. 6b, Table 6). The EPMA indicate that the major elements in zircon are CaO (55.21 wt%), P2O5 (42.08 wt%), and F (2.7 wt%). Significant amounts of Th, Fe, Y and LREE were reported as substitutions in fluorapatite (Table 6). Other minerals Monazite [LREE,Th(PO4)] is the most common accessory mineral in many4 magmatic and meta-morphic rocks, especially rocks characterized by mildly to strongly peraluminous compositions. Monazite crystals appear mainly as euhedral to subhedral inclusions in the zircon and columbite minerals (Fig. 6a). Pyrite (FeS2) is the main sulfide encountered and it is disseminated in the shear zones. Gener- ally, pyrite of the El-Sibai shear zones is partially or entirely oxidized to oxyhydroxides such as hematite and goethite. This process can be classified as pseudomorphic desulfidization under oxidizing conditions. Desulfidization of pyrite precursor creates voids that can be refilled by secondary minerals enriched in Th, REE, U and Ti. Pyrite occurs as well developed cubic octahedron crystals with pale-brass yellow colour and metallic luster. This confirms the reducing conditions during the late stages of columbite crystallization, which is also responsible for the formation of pyrite. This may explain the metasomatic processes that took place under alkaline medium. Titanite CaTi(SiO4)(O,OH,F) is an important constituent of ijolitic and nepheline syenitic alkaline rocks. Amounts of trace elements, particularly the LREE, Nb, Ta and Zr, titanite and other accessory phases such as apatite and perovskite are important in the study of the genesis and geo-chemical evolution of alkaline igneous rocks. Ti-tanite is an important factor controlling the REE distribution in a wide variety of rock compositions and geochemical processes because it is one of the most common and pervasive accessory phases and it has the ability to incorporate large quantities Table 6. Mineral chemistry of selected some minerals from El-Sibai shear zone, the minerals obtained by EMPA, the major oxides by (wt%). Rocks El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai El-Sibai Sample ZS6-1 ZS6-1 ZS6-1 ZS6-1 Mineral name Fluorapatite Core-A1 Fluorapatite Rim-A2 Fluorapatite Core-A3 Fluorapatite Rim-A4 Average N=4 F 2.154 2.156 2.744 2.242 2.324 SiO2 0.086 0.140 0.211 0.327 0.191 MgO 0.016 0.019 0.014 0.020 0.018 CaO 54.75 55.19 54.40 56.48 55.21 P2O5 41.51 42.16 41.43 43.20 42.08 Cl 0.147 0.144 0.222 0.285 0.2 FeO 0.088 0.297 0.278 2.36 0.756 SrO 0.000 0.014 0.033 0.047 0.031 Y2O3 0.000 0.009 0.000 0.011 0.011 La2O3 0.096 0.032 0.020 0.043 0.048 Ce2O3 0.043 0.000 0.062 0.097 0.067 Pr2O3 0.110 0.000 0.022 0.044 0.059 Nd2O3 0.080 0.000 0.150 0.341 0.19 Sm2O3 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.029 Table 6. (continued) Gd2O3 0.113 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.113 PbO 0.091 0.056 0.000 0.000 0.088 ThO2 0.020 0.000 0.041 0.081 0.047 UO2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 98.38 99.27 98.40 104.0 100.01 Structural formula on basis of 4 oxygen atoms F ------ ------- ------ Mg 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Si 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.010 0.006 P 1.038 1.054 1.036 1.080 1.05 Cl ------- ------- ------ Ca 0.978 0.986 0.971 1.008 0.986 Fe 0.003 0.009 0.009 0.074 0.024 Sr 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 Y 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 La 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.003 0.001 Ce 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 Pr 0.003 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 Nd 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.005 Sm 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 Gd 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 Pb 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.002 Th 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 U 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -----no calculation N= number of samples of LREE in its crystal structure (Henderson, 1980; Seifert & Kramer, 2003). Hematite (Fe2O3) appears most commonly in igneous rocks, es2pe3cially in the mineralized granites. It is also very important in sedimentary rocks and their more metamorphosed equivalents (Deer et al., 1966). In the mineralized shear zone of El-Sibai peralkaline granites, hematite occurs as a secondary phase of magnetite crystals in the form of aggregates with thorite and zircon minerals. Disscussion Accessory minerals that have crystallized from magma display different stabilities during fluid-induced, pervasive late-magmatic to hydrothermal alteration that normally affect granites. In-tergrowths of thorite and zircon are abundant in the alkali-feldspar granites (Figs. 3a, 7). Zircon and thorite crystallize in space group I41/amd (Taylor & Ewing, 1978; Hazen & Finger, 1979). Their structures consist of chains of alternating edge-sharing SiO4 tetrahedra and MeO8 (Me=Zr or Th) triangular d4 odecahedra extending8 parallel to [001] and linked by edge-sharing MeO8 poly-hedra. The structural modifications also affect the behavior of zircon and thorite during high- and low-T alterations. Solid-solution ranges between thorite and zircon were identified in the present study (Fig. 8). These ranges (from Th-rich zircon to zircon) could be connected to the high-T fluid-induced alteration of precursor minerals. Some thorite and zircon crystals have compositions close to ideal stoichiometry, on the contrary others show varying degrees of alteration. Based on 4 oxygen atoms, the calculated formula of zircon is A(Zr0.92 Hf0.034Th0.008U0.002Ca0.002Fe0.023Pb0.001) TE 0.99 B(Si0.99P0.006 Al0.056)E 1.01O4, where Th, Si and Zr represent the principle elements with considerable amounts of Ca, U, Fe, and trace Pb. The calculated formula of Th-rich zircon is A(Zr0.82Hf0.05Th0.126U0.00 Ca Fe ) T B(c,- P Al . ) (") . . ^•^0.01^^0.02^ E0.9^ ^"^ 0.9^ 0.004 0.01^E0.9^4' Zircon and Th-rich zircon have higher sum of all cations per formula (2.06 and 2.05 apfu, respectively) than that of ideal thorite and zircon (2 apfu, for 4 oxygen atoms). This is in agreement with Hoskin et al. (2000), Finch & Hanchar (2003) and Förster (2006), who noted that the sum of all cations per formula unit in thorite and zircon-may be N2, when these phases contain substantial amount of interstitial cations such as Ca, U and Al. Enrichment in the latter elements, in addition to F, is believed to have been introduced into the zircon-thorite system during solid state alteration, rather than during primary igneous crystallization. Solubility andmobility of Zr and Th fromthese phases require a pH between 5 and 6, at which they form Zr(OH)4 complexes. At more basic pH the obtained con4plex changes to Zr(OH)5 and the solubility increases strongly. The elevated5 alkalinity in the hydrothermal solutions plays an important role. The hydrothermal solution could be of magmatic origin representing residual fluids expelled from F-rich melts. This conclusion is supported by the widespread fluorite mineralization associated with Fe-oxides and dendritic Mn-oxides along joint planes. Uranium bonding within the crystal structure of thorite and zircon is not expected to be easily dissolved by the mobilizing low-T solutions (Murakami et al., 1991). It is thus likely that these minerals underwent some changes by a metamictization process. During this process U could be released from the crystal lattices. Metamictization was largely caused by nucleic recoil of U and Th during alpha decay. The bombardment of the crystal lattice by large nuclei progressively distorts and eventually destroys the crystal lattice (Murakami et al., 1991). Zircon enriched in Hf in peralkaline granite was connected to post-magmatic metasomatic activity rather than to magmatic fractionation (Wang et al., 2000). This may be confirmed by the fact that normal fractionation during evolution of the per-alkaline melt does not result in separation of Zr and Hf and hence the Zr/Hf ratio is retained at a constantly high value (e.g. approx. 20 in El-Sibai peralkaline granite). Thus, Hf-enrichment in the El-Sibai altered granite association and hence in the associated hafnian zircon is controlled by other factors. Very important is F in the evolution of such highly fractionated melts that tend to be enriched in Na and Al with decreasing silica. Fractionation includes a combination of crystal settling and flow accumulation of progressively evolved, more F-rich, lower-temperature, less dense, less viscous melts towards the upper and inner parts of the magma chamber. This leads to an increase in diffusion rates of HFSE, thus permitting late liquid-liquid fractionation of granitic melt (Hannah & Stein, 1990). The #Hf ratios (Table 3), ranging between 3.54 and 6.44 with average 4.62 in the investigated zircon of metasomatized peralkaline granites, is not so high, which manifests that an alkaline and relatively high temperature >425 °C (Abdalla et al. 1994) environment could be suitable for their deposition, in which the Hf-complexes are thermally unstable (Portnov, 1965). Zircon of the El-Sibai altered peralkaline granites is closely concordant with the trends III and MHZ (Figs. 8, 9) that presumably represent a preserved metasomatic hydrothermal trend. This trend deviates from the theoretical trend exhibited by the zircon-hafnon solid solution series (i.e. trend I, Fig. 8). This discrepancy can be attributed to a significant deficit of Zr and Hf relative to Si content (i.e. high concentration of vacancies on the Zr lattice position (Kempe et al., 1997; Abdalla et al., 2008). The trends III and MHZ (Figs. 8, 9) exhibited by zircons from metasomatized hydrothermal environment are in accordance with the trend defined by the substitution scheme Zr4+, (Si4+) o- Hf + HREE3+ + U4+ + Th4+ + Y3+ + (P5+). According to Speer (1982) and Beiousova et al. (1998) zircon is unusual composition occurring along such a trend. These zircons were interpreted by Pointer et al. (1988) as metastable solid solution, in the series zircon-xenotime (YPO4), thorite (ThSiO4), cof-finite (USiO4). Minerals of this series are isostruc-tural and can show limited substitution range with zircon even at higher temperature (Mumpton & Roy, 1961). Because the HREE are geochemi-cally close to Y, they also tend to be involved in this isomorphic substitution series. This zircon is formed from fluids that transported Th, U, Y, P, and HREE. Zircon is highly soluble in alkalic and F-rich magmas (Keppler, 1991), therefore Zr is progressively enriched in differentiating magmas. Over a range of 0-6 wt% F, solubility of zircon increases with the square of the F content, and the solubility of other refractory minerals, including rutile and thorite also increases (Keppler, 1991). Zircon crystallization removes most Zr from the magma. Zircon is extremely stable, even during most hydrothermal alterations, which inhibit subsequent mobilization. In contrast, sodic pyroxenes and amphiboles are more easily broken down and there Zr would be easily released to hydrothermal fluids (Rubin et al., 1993). Susceptibility of zircon to alteration can be enhanced by metamictization or mechanical fracturing during deformation. Ferrugination (hematitization) process is mainly related to strongly alkaline hydrothermal solutions at pH value of more than 10 with temperatures varying between 350 °C and 450 °C (Sweewald & Sayfried, 1990), while kaoliniti-zation and silicification processes are essentially associated with strongly acidic solutions at pH from 1 to 3 with temperatures varying between 150 °C and 400 °C (Bucanan, 1982). Accordingly, the temperatures of the solution ranged between 150 °C and 450 °C. It is believed that the mineralizing hydrothermal solutions never reached more than 500 °C due to destruction of Al2O3 above this temperature (Frantz & Weisbrod, 1974). Ferrugi-nation along the shear zone was accompanied by higher intensity of radioactivity compared to the silicification and kaolinitization processes (Fig. 3). This is due to the high ability of iron oxides to adsorb radioactive elements from its solutions. The reported ferrugination process may be due to the mobilization of ferric ions released from the fer-romagnesian minerals during the alteration processes. Hematite may be precipitated according to the oxidation- reduction reaction. 4 Fe3O4 (Magnetite) + 02 ^ 6 Fe2O3 (Hematite) Silicification process in a shear zone is also well developed and most commonly represented by quartz veinlets varying in thickness from a few mm to less than 20 cm, extending for variable distances, not exceeding 80 m. The silicification process results in an increase of SiO2 at the expense of the other major oxides. Pier (1992) attributed the development of SiO2 to the hydration of feldspars as follows: 2 75Na2CaAl4Si8O24 + 2H+ + K+ (Plagioclase) ^ KAl3^i3O10(OH)2-4 1.5Na+ + 0.75Ca+2 + 3SiO2 (Muscovite) 1.5KAlSi3O8 + H+ (Potassium feldspar) ^ 0.5 KAl3Si3O10(OH)2 + K++ 3SiO2 (Muscovite) Kaolinitization accompanies, but to a less extent, the ferrugination and silicification alterations in the shear zone. The kaolinitization process causes an increase in the amount of Fe2O3, CaO and MnO at the expense of the other ma2jo3r oxides. The intensity of kaolinite alteration increases near the edge of the shear zone. Rice (1973) pointed out that kaolinite may be formed in granite due to hydrolysis of albite. In this reaction silica precipitates as an amorphous phase. 4NaAlSi3O6 + 4H2CO3 + 18H2O (Albite) ^ 4Na++ 8H4SiO4 + ^HCO3 Al4Si4O10(OH)8 (Kaolinite) Crystallization of fluorite, galena and pyrite in the mineralized shear zone reflects the important role of F and S. Zr, Hf, Th and Ti are typical HFSE, which are generally considered immobile during hydrothermal water-rock interactions. Experimental and natural evidences, however, have demonstrated that Zr, Ti and Th may become mobile especially in high-temperature (magmatic or hydrothermal) environments containing strong com-plexing agents such as fluorine, sulfur and others (Keppler, 1993). The mobility of the REE and Th was attributed to high F contents in the hydrothermal fluids (Poitrasson, 2002) as F-rich fluids are capable of transporting Th (Keppler & wyllie, 1990). The critical role of F complexing in REE transport in hydrothermal fluids is also indicated by Y, Ho fractionation (Bau & Dulski, 1995). The fact that F may play a prominent role in the hydrothermal mobilization of HFSE has been indicated for Zr, Th and REE (Moine & Selvi, 1999). Harris & Marin (1980) reported on the important role of mobile fluoride complexes such as [Na(REE)F4] and [(ZrF) (REEF4)3] in determining the distribu4tion of REE and other trace elements such as Zr during hydrothermal conditions. Moreover, Taylor et al. (1981) added carbonate complexes in the alkali-enriched fluid as an important factor responsible for Zr and HREE transportation. The abundantly detected zircon and Th-bearing minerals, of demonstrably hydrothermal origin, can be attributed to the role of F-rich fluids. Zr and Th are generally considered as highly immobile elements, yet the occurrence of zircon indicates that their significant concentrations can be transported via specified F-rich fluids. Pichavant (1983) showed that the F-rich fluid phase equilibrated with alkali feldspars, is strongly enriched in Na in comparison to the Cl-rich fluid. Thus any process leading to reduction of F-rich fluid (such as volatile loss or stabilizing F into F-bearing minerals, e.g. fluorite, and fluorapatite), will result in the albitization of the granite. Consequently, an increased pH of the exsolved fluids from the crystallizing peralkaline granite will lead to the destabilization of rare element complexes including those of Zr and Hf in these fluids and promote their deposition. Zircon and xenotime are isostructural and exhibits the general formula ABO4, where A refers to the larger Zr and Y atoms and B to the smaller P and Si atoms. Xenotime-substituted zircon is formed as the result of the coupled substitution: Zr4+ + Si4+ ^ Y(HREE)3+ + P5+ (Romans et al., 1975). Conclusion Mineralized shear zone trending NNE-SSW is located at the northern segment of Gabal El-Sibai peralkaline granites (500 m in length and 0.5 to 1.5 m in width). Ferrugination, kaolinitiza-tion, and silicification are the main wall-rock alteration features developed within the shear zone. There the rare-metal minerals are associated with ferrugination (hematitization) zone. These alterations are good traps for rare metals of thorite, ferrocolumbite, pyroclore, plumbopyroclore, fluorite, cerite-(Ce), zircon, Th-rich zircon, zirconolite (mixture of zircon and columbite), fluorapatite, titanite, and monazite minerals. Cerite-(Ce), zir-conolite and plumbopyroclore minerals are represented the first time in the rare-metals peralkaline granites in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) provides an indication of a range of solid solutions between thorite and zircon, in which intermediate phases, 1.e. Th-rich zircon, were formed. These phases have higher sum of all cations per formula (2.0 to 2.09 apfu, for 4 oxygen atoms) than that of ideal thorite and zircon. This is attributed to the presence of substantial amount of interstitial cations such as U, Y, Ca, and Al in these phases. Enrichment of Th and U in an altered zircon (Th-rich zircon) preferentially involves coupled substitution Ca2+ + (Th,U)4+^ 2Zr4+ + 2Si4+, implying that significant amount of U and Th may enter the Zr and Si position in zircon. Although Zr, Hf, and HREE are considered as highly immobile elements, yet the occurrence of the formed Zircon enriched Hf-, U-, Th-, Y- and HREE of hydrothermal origin indicates the mobilization of these elements via specified (K+, Na+, H+, CO3-, O2 and F-)-rich fluids. This study shows zircon and Th-rich zircon related to metasomatic hydrothermal zircon (MHZ). Zircon and fluorite of demonstrably hydrothermal origin can be attributed to the role of fluorine-rich fluids. Fluoride complexes such as [Na(REE)F4] and [(ZrF)(REEF4)3] are important to determine the distribution o4f 3REE and other trace elements, such as Zr during hydrothermal conditions. Zr and Th are generally considered as highly immobile elements, yet the occurrence of zircon indicates that significant concentrations of Zr and Th can be transported under specified F-rich fluids. The zircon of El-Sibai altered peralkaline granite is interpreted as a metastable solid solution, in the series zircon-thorite (ThSiO4). The Hf-concentrat-ing mechanism is assumed 4due to solid-state action (subsolidus reaction) of exsolved fluids rich in K+, Na+, F- and subsequently H+. The shear zone was affected by different types of hydrothermal solutions with temperatures varying between 150 °C and 450 °C. The produced al- terations acted as good traps for Th- and U-bear-ing minerals with rare metals in the El-Sibai per-alkaline granites (shear zone). The detailed min-eralogical investigations of these zone revealed its enrichment in Th, Zr, Nb, Pb, U, F, P, LREE (Ce), especially concerning the hematization processes. The close correlation of ferruginated samples with high radioactivity is related to the high ability of iron oxides to adsorb radioactive elements from their solutions. The shear zone facilitates the circulation of hydrothermal fluids, leading to mobilization and redistribution of radioactive elements. Also the presence of galena and deep violet fluorite are very good evidences for the presence of hydrothermal fluids. Therefore, it is clear that alteration processes have resulted from ascending (hypogene) hydrothermal solutions rather than descending (supergene) meteoric water. So, the hydrothermal origin could be accepted for mineralizations within the shear zone. From the study of El-Sibai altered granites (shear zone), we concluded that the studied area contains high concentrations of Th, Zr, Nb, U, Pb, P, Ce, F and REE, especially in the ferruginated parts of the area. Accordingly, the El-Sibai shear zone could represent a favorable source for rare metals (Th, Zr, Nb, U, Pb, P, Ce, F, and REE). References Abadalla, H. M., Helba, H. & Matsueda, H. 2008: Chemistry of zircon in rare metal granitoids and associated rocks, Eastern Desert, Egypt, Resource Geology, 59/1: 51-68, doi:10.1111/j.1751-3928.2008.00079.x. Abdalla, H.M., Matsueda, H., Ishihara, 8. & Miura, H. 1994: Mineral chemistry of albite-enriched granitoids at Um Ara, Southeastern Desert, Egypt. Int. Geol. Re., 36/11: 1067-1077, doi:10.1080/00206819409465505. Abdel-Fattah, M., Abdel-Rahman, A.M. & El-Kib-bi, M.M. 2001: Anorogenic magmatism: chemical evolution of the Mount El-Sibai A-Type complex (Egypt), and implications for the origin of within-plate felsic magmas, Geological Magazine, 138: 67-85. Abdel Kader, Z.M., Bakhit, F.s. & Ali, M.A. 2001: Geochemistry of the younger granites in El Sibai area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt, The Mineralogical Society of Egypt. The Fourteenth Annual Meeting, Abstract: 16 p Abd El-Naby, H. H. 2009: High and low temperature alteration of uranium and thorium minerals, Um Ara granites, South Eastern Desert, Egypt, Ore Geology Reviews, 35: 436-446. Ali, M.A. 2001: Geology, petrology and radioactivity of Gabal El-Sibai area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt, Ph. D. Thesis, Cairo University: 300 p. Ali, M.A. & Lentz, D. R. 2001: Mineralogy, geochemistry and age dating of shear zones hosted Nb-,Ta-, Zr-Hf-, Th-, U-bearing granitic rocks at Ghadir and El-Sella areas, South Eastern Desert, Egypt, Chin. J. Geochem., 30/4: 453478, doi:10.1007/s11631-011-0531-5. Bayliss, p., Mazzi, f., Munno, R. & White, T. J. 1989: Mineral nomenclature: Zirconolite. Mineral Mag., 53: 565-569. Bayliss, P. & Levinson, A. A. 1988: A system of nomenclature for rare-earth mineral species: Revision and extension. Am. Mineral., 73: 422-423. Bau, M. & Dulski, P. 1995: Comparative study of yttrium and rareearth element behaviours in fluorine-rich hydrothermal fluids. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 119: 213-223. Belousova, E. a., Griffin, W. L. & Pearson, N. J. 1998: Trace element composition and cathodo-luminescence properties of Southern African kimberlitic zircon. Mineral Mag., 62: 355-366. Brugger, J., Gieere, R., Graeser, s. & Meisser, N. 1997: The crystal chemistry of romeite. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 127: 136-146. Butler, C. A., Holdsworth, R. E & stachan, R. A. 1995: Evidence for Caledonian sinistral strike-slip motion and associated fault zone weakening, Outer Hebrides fault zone, NW Scotland. Journal of Geological Society, London, 152: 743-746. Bucanan, M. s. 1982: The geochemistry of some igneous rock series. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 9: 101-137. Breiter, K., Förster, H. J. & Škoda, R. 2006: Extreme P-, Bi-, Nb-, Sc-, U- and F-rich zircon from fractionated perphosphorous granites: the peraluminous Podlesi granite system, Czech Republic. Lithos, 88: 15-34. Chakoumakos, B. C. 1984: Systematics of the py-rochlore structure type, ideal. J., Sol. State, Chem, 53: 120-129. Chakoumakos, B. C. 1986: Pyrochlore. In McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology 1987. Parker, S. p. (ed.): McGraw-Hill, New York: 393-395. Correia Neves, J.M., Nunes, J.E. & sahama, T.G. 1974: High hafnium members of the zircon-haf-non series from the granite pegmatites of Zam-bezia, Mozambique, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 67: 73-80. Čern'y, p., Meintzer, R. E. & Anderson, A. J. 1985: Extreme fractionation in rare-element granitic pegmatites: Selected examples of data and mechanisms. Candian Mineralogist, 23: 381421. Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A. & Zussman, J. 1966: An introduction to rock forming minerals. Longmans, London: 517 p. Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A. & Zussman, J. 1992: Rock forming minerals, 5. Non silicates, John Wiley & Sons, New York: 371 p. El-Gaby, s. 1975: Petrochemistry and geochemistry of some granites from Egypt. Neu. Jb. Miner. Abh., 124: 147-189. El-Ramly, M. F. 1962: The absolute ages of some basement rocks in the Eastern and Southwestern Deserts of Egypt. Geological Survey of Egypt paper, 15: 12 p. El-Ramly, M.F. & Akaad, M.K. 1960: The basement complex in the Central Eastern Desert of Egypt between lat. 24o 30' and 25o 40' N. Geological. Survey, Egypt. P., 8: 35 p. El-shazly, E. M. 1964: On the classification of the Precambrian and other rocks of magmatic affiliation in Egypt. XXII Inter. XXII Inter. Geol. Congr. Proc. Sect. 10, India, 88-101. El-Kammar, a. M., EL-Hazik, N. S., Mahdi, M. & Ali, N. 1997: Geochemistry of accessory minerals associated with radioactive mineralization in the Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 25/2: 237-252. El-Manharawy, M. S. 1977: Geochronological investigation of some basement rocks in Central Eastern Desert, Egypt between lats. 25° 00 and 26° 00 N. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. Sci., Cairo University: 238 p. Finch, R. J. & Hanchar, J. M. 2003: Structure and chemistry of zircon and zircon group minerals. In: Hanchar, J.M. & Hoskin, P.W.O. (eds.): Zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Geochemical Society, Washington, DC 53: 26 p. Förster, H. J. 2006: Composition and origin of intermediate solid solutions in the system thorite-xenotime-zircon-coffinite. Lithos, 88: 35-55. Förster, H. J. 2000: Cerite-(Ce) and thorian syn-chysite-(Ce) from Niederbobritzsch (Erzgebirge, Germany): implications for the differential mobility of Th and the LREE during granite alteration. Canadian Mineralogist, 38: 67-79. Fleischer, M. 1987: Glossary of Mineral Species, 5th Edition. Mineral. Rec, Inc., 227, Tucson, AZ. Fleischer, M. 1989: Additions and corrections to the Glossary of Mineral Species, 5th Edition. Mineral. Rec., 20 (1987): 289-298. Frantz, J. D. & Weisbord, A. 1974: Infiltration metasomatism in the system K2O-SiO2-Al2O3-H2O-HCl. In: Geochemical transjaort and kinetics, 634: 261-271. Frondel, J. W. & Cuttito, A. 1955: Glossary of uranium and thorium-bearing minerals. Geological Survey Bulletin, 5: 1009. Gaines, R. v., Skinner, H. C. W., Foord, E. E., Mason, B., RosENzwEiG, A., King, V.T. & Dowty, E.1997: Dana's New Mineralogy. 8th ed. Wiley and Sons, New York: 1819 p. Greiling, R.G., El-Ramly, M.F., Rashwan, A.A. & Kamal El-Din, G.M. 1993: Towards a comprehensive structural synthesis of the (Proterozo-ic) Arabian Nubian Shield in E. Egypt. In: U-Thgrweihe & H. ScHANDELMEiE (eds.); Geoscien-tist Res. Northeast Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam, 15-19. Hannah, J.L. & Stein H.J. 1990: Magmatic and hydrothermal processes in ore-bearing systems. In: Stein, H. & Hannah, J. (eds.): Ore-bearing granite systems: Petrogenesis and mineralizing processes. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper, 1-11. Hassan, M. A. & Hashad, A. H. 1990: Precambrian of Egypt. "The anorogenic alkalic rocks, South Eastern Desert, Egypt". Annal Geological Survey of Egypt, 9: 81-101. Hazen, R. M. & Finger, L.W.1979: Crystal structure and compressibility of zircon at high pressure. Am. Mineral., 64: 157-161. HosKiN, P. W. P. G., Kinny, p. D., Wybgrn, D. & Chappell, B.w. 2000: Identifying accessory mineral saturation during differentiation in granitoid magmas: an integrated approach. Journal of Petrology, 41: 1365-1396. Henderson, P. 1980: Rare earth element partitioning between sphene, apatite and other coexisting minerals of the Kangerdlugssuaq intrusion, E. Greenland. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 72: 8185. HussEiN, H. A. 1978: Lecture course in nuclear geology: 101 p. HussEiN, A. A., Ali, M. M. & El-Ramly, M. F. 1982: A proposed new classification of the granites of Egypt. Journal Volcanic Geoth., Re., 14: 187198. Hume, W.F.1935: Geology of Egypt. Vol II, Part II. The later plutonic and intrusive rocks, Geological Survery Egypt, Government press, Cairo, 301-688 Ibrahim, i.H., Ali, M.A. & Abdel Wahed, A.A. 2003: Mineralogical and spectrometric studies of El-Sibai shear zone, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. 6th Intern. Conf. on Geochemistry. Alex. Univ., Egypt, I-A: 25-43. Kamal El-Din, G.M.1991: Geochemistry and tectonic significance of the Pan-African El-Sibai window, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Heidelberg University:114 p. Keppler, H. 1991: Influence on the solubility of high field strength trace elements in granitic melts. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, abstract 72: 532-533. Keppler, H. 1993: Influence of fluorite on the enrichment of high field strength trace elements in granitic rocks. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 114: 479-788. Keppler, H. &.Wyllie, P. J. 1990: Role of fluids in transport and fractionation of uranium and thorium in magmatic processes. Nature 348:531-533, doi:10.1038/348531a0. Kempe, u., Gruner, T., Renng, A.D. & Wglf, D. 1997: Hf- rich zircons in rare-metal bearing granites: Magmatic or metasomatic origin. In: Papunen, H. (ed.): Mineral deposits: Research and exploration where do they meet? A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 643-646. Lumpkin, G.R., Hart, K.P., McMlinn, P.J., Payne, TE., Giere, R. & Williams, C.T. 1994: Retention of actinides in natural pyrochlores and zircono-lite. Radiochim. Acta, 66/67: 469-474. Lumpkin, G.R. & Ewing, R.C. 1995: Geochemical alteration of pyrochlore group minerals: Pyro-chlore subgroup. Am. Mineral., 80: 732-743. Mandarino, J. 1999: Fleischer's Glossary of Mineral Species. Mineralogical Recored, Tucson, Arizona. Miyawaki, R. & Nakai, I. 1987: Crystal structures of rare-earth minerals. Rare Earths (Kidorui), 11:1-133. Mgghazi, A.m., Hassanen, M.A., Mohamed, F.H. & Ali, s. 2004: Late Neoproterozoic strongly per-aluminous leucogranites, South Eastern Desert, Egypt-petrogenesis and geodynamic significance. Mineralogy and petrology, 81: 19-41. Moine, B. & Salvi, S. 1999: Role of fluorine-rich fluids in the hydrothermal transport of "immobile" elements (Th, Zr, REE, Zl). Bull. De liaison de la Societe Francaise de Mineralogie et de Cristallographie (S. F. M. C.), 11: 90-92. MoussA, E.M. 2001: Petrographical and geochemi-cal characteristics of Gabal El-Sibai and Abu Garadi alkali feldspar granite phase and their potentialities to host uranium-thorium mineralization. Egyptian Mineralogist, 13: 101-124. MoussA, E. M., Stern, R. J., Manton, w. I & Ali, K. a. 2008: SHRIMP zircon dating and Sm/Nd isotopic investigations of Neoproterozoic granitoids, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Precambrian Research, 160:341-356. Murakami, T., Ghakoumakos, B. G., Ewing, R. G., Lumpkin, G. R. & Weber, W. J. 1991: Alphade-cay event damage in zircon. Am. Mineral., 76: 1510-1532. Pier, G.A 1992: Geochemistry of granites and trachytes from the Summit region of Mt. Kenya. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 89: 394-409. Pighavant, M. 1983: (Na, K) exchange between alkali feldspars and aqueous solutions containing borate and fluoride anions, experimental results at p=1 kbar. 3rd. NATO Adv. Stud. Inst. Feldspars and feldspathoids, Rennes. XXX: 102 p. Pointer, G.M., Ashworth, J.R. & Ixer, R.A. 1988: The zircon thorite mineral group in metasoma-tized granite, Ririwai, Nigeria. 1: Geochemistry and metastable solid solution of thorite and coffinite. Mineral. Petrol., 38: 245-262. Poitrasson, F.2002: In situ investigations of alla-nite hydrothermal alteration: examples from calc-alkaline and anorogenic granite of Corsica (southeast France).Contri. Mineral. Petrol., 142: 485-500. Portnov, A.m. 1965: The zirconium: hafnium ratio in minerals of the Burpala massif. Geochem Int., 2: 238-241. Rige, G.M.1973: Chemical weathering on the Carnmenellis granite. Mineralogical Magazine, 39: 429-447. Romans, P. A., Brown, L. & White, J. G. 1975: An electron microprobe study of yttrium, rare earth and phosphorous dis tribution in zoned and ordinary zircon. Am. Mineral., 60: 475-480. Rubin, J. N., Henry, G. D. & Price, J. G. 1993: The mobility of zirconium and other "immobile" elements during hydrothermal alteration. Chemical Geology, 110: 29-47. Seifert, W. & Kramer, W. 2003: Accessory titanite: an important carrier of Zr in lamprophyres. Lithos, 7: 81-98. Smith, D. K. J. 1984: Uranium mineralogy. In: DeVivo, B., Ippolito, F., Gapaldi, G. & Simpson, P.R. (eds.): Uranium geochemistry, Mineralogy, Geology, Exploration and Resources, Institute of Mining and Metalluragy, London, 43-88. Speer, J. A. 1982: The actinide orthosilicates. In: Ribbe, p. H. (ed.): Reviews in Mineralogy, Min-eralogical Society of America, 5, 2nd Edition, 113-135. Stern, R. J. & Hedge G. E.1985: Gechronologic and isotopic contraints on Late Precambrain crustal evolution in the Eastern Desert in Egypt. Am. Journal Science, 258: 97-127. Sultan, M., Arvidson, R.E., Dungan, I. J., Stern, R.J. & El-Kalioubi, B. 1988: Extension of the Najd shear system from Saudi Arabia to the central Eastern Desert of Egypt based on integrated field and landsat observations. Tectonics, 7/6: 1291-1306. Sweewald, J. S. & Sayfried, J. W. 1990: The effect of temperature on metal mobility in subsea floor hydrothermal systems: constraints from basalt alteration experiments. Earth Planet Science, 101: 388-403. Taylor, M. & Ewing, R. G. 1978: The crystal structure of ThSiO4 polymorphs: huttonite and thorite. Acta Crysjtallographica B 34, 1074-1079. Taylor, R. P., Strong, D. F. & Fryer B. J. 1981: Volatile control of contrasting trace element distributions in peralkaline granitic and volcanic rocks. Contrib. Mineral., Petrol., 77: 267-271. Wang, R. G., Zhao, G. T., Lu, J. J., Ghen, X. M., Xu, S. J. & Wang, D. Z. 2000: Chemistry of Hf-rich zircons from the Laoshan I- and A-type granites, Eastern China. Mineralogical Magazine, 64: 867 - 877. Warner, J. K. & Ewing, E. R.1993: Crystal chemistry of samarskite. Am. Mineral., 78: 419-424. Wedepohl, K. H. 1978: Handbook of geochemistry. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 478 p. Whittaker, E. J. & Muntus, R. 1970: Ionic radii for use in geochemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochi-mica Acta, 34: 945. Williams, J. k. & Giere, R.1996: Zirconolite a review of localities worldwide, and a compilation of its chemical compositions. Bull. Nat. Hist. Museum Geol. Ser., 52: 1-24 Woodhead, J. A., Rossman, G. R. & Thomas, A. P. 1991: Hydrous species in zircon. Am. Mineral., 76: 1533-1546.