118 Acta argiculturae Slovenica, Supplement 5, 118–121, Ljubljana 2016 24th Int. Symp. “Animal Science Days”, Ptuj, Slovenia, Sept. 21st−23rd, 2016. COBISS: 1.08 Agris category code: L50 THE EFFECT OF EWE MINERAL STATUS ON THE LAMBS MINERAL SUPPLY Erika SZIGETI 1, János KÁTAI 2, István KOMLÓSI 3, János OLÁH 4, Csaba SZABÓ 5 The effect of ewe mineral status on the lambs mineral supply 1 University of Debrecen, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, H4032 Debrecen Böszörményi út 138. Hungary, e-mail: szigeti@ agr.unideb.hu 2 Same address as 1, e-mail: katai@agr.unideb.hu 3 Same address as 1, e-mail: komlosi@agr.unideb.hu 4 Same address as 1, e-mail: olahja@agr.unideb.hu 5 Same address as 1, e-mail: szabo.csaba@agr.unideb.hu ABSTRACT The aim of our study is to examine the mineral status of Tsigai ewes and their lambs based on wool mineral content, and the relationship between ewes wool and milk mineral content and the lamb wool mineral concentration. Ten Tsigai sheep nursing single lamb was randomly selected on the 6–10th day of lactation. Sampling was carried out in March. Wool samples free of visible contamination were obtained from the withers of the ewes and the lambs using bended scissors. Approximately 10 ml of milk samples were collected by hand milking. Ca, Mg, Na, Cu, S, P, Se and Zn content were determined by ICP-OES (Perkin-Elmer, Optima 3300 DV). Statistical analyses were carried out by SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) GLM procedure. Wool mineral content did not show deficient supply in case of ewes. Young lamb’s wool mineral composition is distinct from those measured in adult ewes. This fact and the lack of signifi- cant correlation between ewe and lamb mineral status indicates strictly regulated mineral passage through placenta. Key words: sheep, ewes, lambs, mineral status, wool mineral content, milk mineral content 1 INTRODUCTION Follicle development during the last third of the gestation period and early postnatal life determines the amount and quality of wool produced by adult sheep. The ewes’ nutrient intake must be adequate for the maintenance and wool growth as well as for the foe- tus growth and development until weaning (Hatcher and Johnson, 2005). Insufficient nutrient supply is one of the factors of which can adversely affect follicle de- velopment. Studies with merino sheep (Corbett, 1979) demonstrated that the impaired initiation and matura- tion of secondary follicles during the third trimester of pregnancy permanently reduces adult wool production. All follicles initiated at birth, but undernutrition during early postnatal life can reduce the capacity of follicles to produce wool and delay the maturation of second- ary follicles even 6–12 months (Khan et al., 2012). The essentiality of sixteen minerals has been identified in sheep diets (Sahoo and Soren, 2011). Minerals has in- fluence on wool growth by reducing feed intake (Na, K, S, P, Mg, Co and Zn), by altering rumen function and thus the supply of nutrients (S, Na, K and Co) or by disturbing metabolic processes (Zn, Cu, Se, I and Co). Maternal Se status has been demonstrated to have an ef- fect on secondary to primary follicle ratio of lambs (Ma- golski et al., 2011). The sulfur content of wool fibre has a strong correlation with fiber strength, work of rupture and initial modulus (Qi and Lupton, 1994). Copper de- ficiency can cause depigmentation, lack of crimps, low mechanical strength and lustrous appearance. Zinc de- ficiency results in reduced wool growth, lack of crimps, lustrous and brittle fibers (White et al., 1994). Se defi- ciency also reducing wool growth, but has no effect on Acta agriculturae Slovenica, Supplement 5 – 2016 119 THE EFFECT OF EWE MINERAL STATUS ON THE LAMBS MINERAL SUPPLY feed intake (Sahoo and Soren, 2011). Therefore, the aim of our study is to examine the mineral status of Tsigai ewes and their lambs based on wool mineral content, and the relationship between ewes wool and milk min- eral content and the lamb wool mineral concentration. 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten Tsigai sheep nursing single lamb was ran- domly selected on the 6–10th day of lactation. Sam- pling was carried out in March. The animals received the same feeding regime, of which consisted of alfalfa hay and concentrate. Wool samples free of visible con- tamination were obtained from the withers of the ewes and the lambs using bended scissors. Approximately 10 ml of milk samples were collected by hand milk- ing. After sampling, samples were directly transported to the laboratory, and calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), copper (Cu), sulphur (S), phosphorus (P), selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn) content were analysed. Organic contamination of wool was removed by wash- ing with ethyl-alcohol (96 %, Sigma-Aldrich). Dried samples were mineralized by 2 ml nitric acid (distilled, Sigma-Aldrich) in ultrasonic cleaning unit at 60 °C for 30 min. After cooling 2 ml of 30 % hydrogen peroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) were added and samples were miner- alized for 90 min at 100 °C. After mineralization solu- tions were filled up to 10 ml with distilled water and fil- tered throughout MN 619 G ¼ (155 mm diameter) filter paper. Measurement of solutions was carried out with ICP-OES (Perkin-Elmer, Optima 3300 DV). Statistical analyses were carried out by SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) GLM and CORR procedure at p = 0.05 level. Group differences were tested with Tukey range test. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Interestingly, the calcium, phosphorus, magne- sium, selenium and zinc content of ewes’ wool and milk was similar (Table 1). Ewe’s milk had higher concen- tration of Na, Cu and S than wool. Quite surprisingly lamb’s wool had significantly lower mineral concentra- tions, than ewes, except phosphorous. The Ca content of both wool samples were similar to those reported for other genotypes (Patkowska-Sokola et al., 2009), but about tenfold higher than suggested by Sahoo and Soren (2011). The Ca transported in ionized form, and its value regulated in narrow intervals in blood plasma (Georgievskii et al., 1982). Anke (1966) reported that the dietary Ca intake had negative correlation with P and Zn content of hair. As it is presented in Table 1 milk contains about four times more Ca than P, thus lambs consuming only milk had much higher Ca intake. De- spite that, the P content of lambs’ wool was more than two times higher than in case of ewes. Lambs have wool coverage at birth, and in the first week of life certainly a minimal growth occurs. Therefore, the mineral con- tent of that base wool depend on the maternal nutrition during late gestation. The P content of ewe’s wool was about 2–4 times higher reported for other genotypes (Patkowska-Sokola et al., 2009), indicating that the supply was more than adequate. Mg and Na content of wool showed average supplementation based on other research results (Szigeti et al., 2016; Patkowska-Sokola et al., 2009). The Cu content of hair is close correlation with the liver Cu reservoir if it is less than 20 mg/kg (Kellaway et al., 1978). According to Suttle and Mc- Murray (1983) if fleece Cu content is above 2.5 mg/kg than deficiency could occur only for a very short period without any effect on production. The concentration of 5.36 mg/kg indicates sufficient dietary supply. As it is indicated earlier, S content of wool is in close correla- tion with several wool quality parameters. The S content of wool is usually between the ranges of 27–54 000 mg/ kg (Qi and Lupton, 1994). Our results similarly to lit- erature values (Patkowska-Sokola et al., 2009) are below the normal range. This may reflect the fact that ruminal protein is deficient in S containing amino acids, and if the daily ration does not contain enough rumen unde- gradable protein or by-pass amino acids, there won’t be optimum supply for wool production. According to Olson (1969) the concentration of Se Sample Ca P Mg Na Cu S Se Zn Ewe, wool 2701 581b 550a 1743b 5.36b 20175b 8.88a 217.4a Ewe, milk 3183 880b 797a 2480a 9.01a 23515a 11.1a 299.6a Lamb, wool 1878 1445a 133b 349c 0.80c 485c 1.95b 5.5b P 0.0798 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 RMSE 1252 469 288 536 1.96 2038 4.03 96.3 Table 1: Mineral content of ewe’s wool and milk, and the offspring wool (mg/kg dry matter) RMSE : root mean square error; a,b,c Means in a column with common superscript do not differ significantly (p > 0.05) Acta agriculturae Slovenica, Supplement 5 – 2016120 E. SZIGETI et al. 5 REFERENCES Anke, M. (1966). Der Mengen- und Spurenelementgehalt des Rinderhaares als Indikator der Calcium-, Magnesium-, Phosphor-, Kalium-, Natrium-, Eisen-, Zink-, Mangan-, Kupfer-, Molybdän- und Kobaltversorgung. 3. Der Enfluß zusätzlicher Mengen- und Spurenelementgaben auf die mineralische Zusammnesetzung des Rinderhaares. Archiv für Tierernährung, 16, 57–75. Carter, D. L., Brown, M. J., Robbins, C. W. (1969). Selenium concentrations in alfalfa from several sources applied to a low selenium, alkaline soil. Proceedings – Soil Society of America, 33(5), 715–718. Corbett, J. L. (1979). Variation in wool growth with physiologi- cal state. In J. L. Black, P. J. Reis (Eds.), Physiological and environmental limitiations to wool growth (pp. 79–98). Ar- midale, University of New England. Georgievskii, V. I., Annenkov, B. N., Samokhin, V. T. (1982). Mineral nutrition of animals. London: Butterworths. Hall, J. A., Bobe, G., Hunter, J. K., Vorachek, W. R., Stewart, W.C., Vanegas, J. A., Estill, C. T., et al. (2013). Effect of feeding selenium-fertilized alfalfa hay on performance of weaned beef calves. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58188. Hatcher, S., Johnson, P. R. (2005). Optimising genetic potential for wool production and quality through maternal nutrition. AFBM Journal, 2(1), 51–56. Kellaway, R. C., Sitorius, P., Leibholz, J. M. L. (1978). The use of copper levels in hair to diagnose hypocuprosis. Research in Veterinary Science. 24, 352–357. Khan, M. J., Abbas, A., Ayaz, M., Naeem, M., Akhter, M. S., Soomro, M. H. (2012). Factors affecting wool quality and quantity in sheep. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(73), 13761–13766. Magolski, J. D., Luther, J. S., Neville, T. L., Redmer, D. A., Reynolds, L. P., Caton, J. S., Vonnahme, K. A. (2011). Maternal nutrition during pregnancy influences offspring wool production and wool follicle development. Journal of Animal Science, 89, 3810–3823. NRC (2007). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Wash- ington: National Academies Press. Olson, O. E. (1969). Selenium as a toxic factor in animal nutri- tion. In: Proceedings. Georgia Nutrition Conference (p. 68). Athens: University of Georgia. Patkowska–Sokola, B., Dobrzanski, Z., Osman, K., Bodkowski, R., Zygadlik, K. (2009). The content of chosen chemical elements in wool of sheep of different origins and breeds. Archiv für Tierzucht, 52(4), 410–418. Qi, K., Lupton, C. J. (1994). A review of the effects of sulfur in the level of 5–10 mg/kg in the hair can indicate graz- ing induced Se poisoning, however, we did not noticed any signs of that. In our previous study we detected somewhat above 5 mg/kg Se in the wool and hair of sheep. It is known that the majority of soils in Hungary is Se deficient. Alfalfa hay originating from Se deficient unfertilized fields contains only about 0.1 mg Se/kg dry matter (Carter et al., 1969, Hall et al., 2013). However, with fertilization it was possible to increase the Se con- tent up to 3.26 mg/kg dry matter (Hall et al., 2013). We measured 9.13 and 7.50 mg/kg in the alfalfa hay and concentrate, respectively. We have no explanations to those very high values, but at least they explain the high concentration measured in ewes’ wool. Zn level was also much higher compared to literature data (Patkowska- Sokola et al., 2009). Zn status of ruminants depends on the forage type, geographical source, possible Zn emis- sion and antagonistic factors in the metabolism (Regi- usné Mőcsényi, 1990). Alfalfa hay contains 22–24 mg/ kg Zn (NRC, 2007) on average, while we detected only 14.1 mg/kg in the feed of our test sheep. This value does not justify, why we detected that high concentration of Zn in the wool of ewes. As the lamb nutrient supply is entirely depends on the ewe nutrient intake, we hypothesised that there should be some correlation between the ewe and lamb mineral status as approached by the mineral content of wool and milk. It is surprising that we could not detect even any moderate correlation (Table 2). This fact in- dicate that the mineral supply of foetuses through the placenta regulated by strict mechanisms ensuring the steady mineral flow. 4 CONCLUSIONS Wool mineral content did not show deficient sup- ply in case of ewes. Young lamb’s wool mineral com- position is distinct from those measured in adult ewes. This fact and the lack of significant correlation between ewe and lamb mineral status indicates strictly regulated mineral passage through placenta. Trait Ca P Mg Na Cu S Se Zn Ewe, wool 0.37 0.20 0.54 –0.20 0.09 0.18 –0.36 –0.06 P 0.30 0.58 0.10 0.57 0.81 0.62 0.31 0.87 Ewe, milk 0.04 –0.38 –0.20 0.04 –0.09 –0.15 0.47 0.20 P 0.91 0.28 0.58 0.92 0.8 0.68 0.17 0.57 Table 2: Correlation between the mineral content of lambs’ wool and the mineral content of ewes wool and milk Acta agriculturae Slovenica, Supplement 5 – 2016 121 THE EFFECT OF EWE MINERAL STATUS ON THE LAMBS MINERAL SUPPLY nutrition on wool production and quality. Sheep & Goat Research Journal, 10(2), 133–138. Regiusné Mőcsényi, Á. (1990). A mikroelemek, ásványianyagok és vitaminok szerepe a lovak takarmányozásában. Állattenyésztés és Takarmányozás, 39(3), 247–254. Sahoo, A., Soren, N. M. (2011). Nutrition for wool production. Webmed Central Nutrition, 2(10), WMC002384. Suttle, N. F., Mc Murray, C. H. (1983). Use of erythrocyte copper:zinc superoxide dismutase activity and hair or fleece copper concentrations in the diagnosis of hypocuprosis in ruminants. Research in Veterinary Science, 35, 47–52. Szigeti, E., Kátai, J., Komlósi, I., Oláh, J., Szabó, Cs. (2016). A genotípus és a mintavétel helyének hatása a gyapjú ásvá- nyi anyag tartalmára. Agrártudományi Közlemények, 69, 157–160. White, C. L., Martin, G. B., Hynd, P. I., Chapman, R. E. (1994). The effect of zinc deficiency on wool growth and skin and wool follicle histology of male merino lambs. British Jour- nal of Nutrition, 71, 425–435.