Je Quineov problem nedoločenosti prevoda in reference relevanten za lingvistične in prevodoslovne teorije? - Todorović, Tadej (Analiza (Ljubljana), 2024)
The paper examines the concept of equivalence in translation theory, exploring its various interpretations and criticisms. It analyses different approaches to equivalence in the literature, including Catford's notion of equivalence, Nida and Taber's formal and dynamic equivalence, and Koller's five types of equivalence. The paper then considers critiques of equivalence, focusing on the critiques based on the influence of Quine's indeterminacy of translation and reference. It argues that while Quine's problem challenges the notion of meaning-based equivalence, other forms of equivalence remain viable, although accepting Quine's position necessitates the elimination of meaning itself. Finally, the paper weighs the implications of these different perspectives on translation theory. While accepting Quine's view challenges some forms of equivalence, it does not completely invalidate the concept. Other types of equivalence, such as those focused on function or effect, remain valid. However, accepting Quine's view requires eliminating the concept of meaning, which has profound implications for the field of translation studies and linguistics in general.
Keywords: ekvivalenca; equivalence; filozofija jezika; indeterminacy of reference; indeterminacy of translation; language; nedoločenost prevoda; nedoločenost reference; Quine